Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 |
121. [Winter] Changes to NPC AI - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
CCP FoxFour wrote: Our end goal is to have PvE and PvP be similar enough that you bring the same fits to both and that yes, there will be far fewer red boxes and a more enjoyable experience killing them. Then you will need to do more than m...
- by Irregessa - at 2012.11.19 15:19:00
|
122. Sticky:Dev Blog: Fifty-Nine Down - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
If the officer Drone Control Units are remaining the way they are on the test server, I can't say I am very excited by them. The only benefit they have over the meta 0 mod is lower CPU, which generally isn't an issue on a carrier that has Drone Co...
- by Irregessa - at 2012.11.14 19:44:00
|
123. New shard - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lin-Young Borovskova wrote: Well, If this idea could get us rid of some scum, I'd say "hell yeah!!" with two fingers up because the real eve would become so much better without those. If you did the proper filtration and change of your p...
- by Irregessa - at 2012.11.14 19:20:00
|
124. [Proposal] Fix Wardec Exploits - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
CCP Dolan wrote: Dear Community, Stop making me delete bad rumor posts. Bad posts cause me physical pain. Forever Yours, CCP "Good Poster" Dolan That's counterproductive. Now I want to post bad posts.
- by Irregessa - at 2012.11.13 22:49:00
|
125. Sticky:Dev Blog: Back to the balancing future! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Grath Telkin wrote: Tyberius Franklin wrote: I'm not really seeing the advantage of separating bonuses. As the plan stands one can simply change clones and links and you have a new fully bonused set of links without changing ships while als...
- by Irregessa - at 2012.11.07 21:53:00
|
126. Sticky:Dev Blog: Back to the balancing future! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Grath Telkin wrote: Ranger 1 wrote: Pick the appropriate clone (and mindlink) for that particular fleet. By your logic the change is essentially useless then, and will have little to no effect, because in a non shocker thats exactly wha...
- by Irregessa - at 2012.11.07 21:05:00
|
127. Sticky:Dev Blog: Back to the balancing future! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Terik Deatharbingr wrote: Pinky Denmark wrote: Giving rails and beams a better alpha does not remove artillery as the very best alpha weapon of choice - The difference atm is HUGE and I only see advantages from closing the gap. Currently r...
- by Irregessa - at 2012.11.07 18:59:00
|
128. Sticky:Dev Blog: Back to the balancing future! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Kara Vix wrote: Lady Naween wrote: As someone with all leadership skills to 5 all I can say is: YAY!!!!!! thank you thank you thank you!!! Offgrid boosting is so boring it isnt funny, and cant wait to be able to dps in my sexy damnation! R...
- by Irregessa - at 2012.11.07 14:30:00
|
129. Sticky:Dev Blog: Back to the balancing future! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Pinky Denmark wrote: Sniping: If CCP has ANY interest in making railguns and beams (not talking about Tachyons) usefull for pvp in a bigger scale I find it very important to double the alpha while keeping all other stats the same... This wont ...
- by Irregessa - at 2012.11.07 14:23:00
|
130. Sticky:Dev Blog: Back to the balancing future! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
My PvP main is largely a boosting character for a large coalition (yeah, I know, excitement to have this on my main). The character has all non-mining specific leadership skills at V, all racial cruisers V, Command Ship V, Cybernetics V and can fl...
- by Irregessa - at 2012.11.07 04:43:00
|
131. Sticky:Dev Blog: Back to the balancing future! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Quote: With the way nested skill requirements work in EVE, it also means that you will still be able to fly an Apocalypse even if you donGÇÖt have the Amarr Battlecruiser skill trained at 4 after the change. It wonGÇÖt matter as long as you ha...
- by Irregessa - at 2012.11.06 16:53:00
|
132. Sticky:[Winter] Ewar Tweaks for Retribution - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Good thing my pvp main has a mem/int mapping right now. It will come in handy for those new skills. /me looks at wiki for my main's alliance for the TP bonused ships, finds only the huginn being used, and that without any TP. I imagine someone w...
- by Irregessa - at 2012.11.03 22:17:00
|
133. Sticky:Video blog: In Development: New destroyers and ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
CCP Fozzie enunciates his words too well. I could understand everything he said. How can he be a CCP dev?
- by Irregessa - at 2012.10.26 03:37:00
|
134. Sticky:[Winter] Missile Rebalance + Hurricane tweak - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Mr Floydy wrote: The changes Fozzie is making here with missiles and through the frig/destroyer/cruiser lines will work towards fixing some of the flaws that exist at the moment, as the balancing changes work through Battlecruisers and Battle...
- by Irregessa - at 2012.10.16 17:39:00
|
135. Sticky:[Winter] Missile Rebalance + Hurricane tweak - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Onictus wrote: Borascus wrote: If you need 3 or more drakes to take it down missiles are too weak. I'll throw you a question then. Why exactly do you think the other three races use battleships over level 3? I'll give you three guesse...
- by Irregessa - at 2012.10.16 17:31:00
|
136. Sticky:Dev blog: Introducing the new and improved Crimewatch - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
So which, if any, of these flags are set by a Dread or destroyer performing an Orbital Bombardment in conjuction with Dust514?
- by Irregessa - at 2012.10.05 18:50:00
|
137. WTS Malice Amarr Assault ship few in existence, CCP Shiny's Frozen Corpse. - in Sell Orders [original thread]
CCP Shiny wrote: Is it me or does that corpse get around quite a bit? If your corpse is getting more action that your live clone, something is very, very wrong.
- by Irregessa - at 2012.09.28 19:45:00
|
138. Tiericide for modules? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
How about how the "Harness" Medium Capacitor Booster (storyline, meta 6) has the exact, same stats as the meta 0 Medium Capacitor Booster I? It is identical in every way but name and icon.
- by Irregessa - at 2012.09.20 14:42:00
|
139. Sticky:[Winter] Missile Rebalance + Hurricane tweak - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
CCP Fozzie wrote: Random McNally wrote: So far there are 74 pages of people either for or against the changes with various levels of whine. You stated that this post is a forum for people to discuss the "idea" of making HM changes. Are the ...
- by Irregessa - at 2012.09.19 16:56:00
|
140. Sticky:[Winter] Missile Rebalance + Hurricane tweak - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
The nighthawk already has lower dps than all the other field command ships, and this change to heavy missiles is going to make it even worse. Why would anyone fly a nighthawk after these changes? CCP could come back and say that command ships will...
- by Irregessa - at 2012.09.18 16:04:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |