Pages: [1] 2 3 4 |
1. Announcement:Industry Teams - Current Plans - in Science and Industry [original thread]
+1 for opening up and saying something I mean really that's just a solid move. It would be nice if some of the other developers had that kind approach. Moving on... Teams are a solid concept but I didn't feel like the % adjustments were worth it....
- by Javajunky - at 2014.12.04 23:26:48
|
2. Things you'd like to see changed in mining. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
CCP has been kicking mining in the balls for years. 1. Making Grav Sites Scannable 2. Immunizing Interdictors from Warp Bubbles to protect mining ops 3. Nerfing the size of cargo bays so you could carry a gdam full set of crystals (partially fixe...
- by Javajunky - at 2014.12.03 15:33:19
|
3. Mining: Working As Intended - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Zircon Dasher wrote: Compensating the high ends probably was overdone, but I am not sure that low-ends were underestimated. To be sure a shitton of low ends were being produced, but after the nerf a lot of people just found other things to do ...
- by Javajunky - at 2013.03.23 23:35:00
|
4. Mining: Working As Intended - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Dave Stark wrote: Zircon Dasher wrote: stuff that barely makes sense. k hmm i have no idea when those changes took place. i thought they were before the drone changes? i could be mistaken, of course. i don't want them to cut empire miner...
- by Javajunky - at 2013.03.23 22:29:00
|
5. Mining: Working As Intended - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Dave Stark wrote: i completely agree, the risk/reward factor with mining is horrible as it stands right now. however removing ABCs from grav sites is only going to make that worse. what needs removing is the low quality ores such as spod and g...
- by Javajunky - at 2013.03.23 22:01:00
|
6. Mining: Working As Intended - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Honest Question: What happens when market trends change? Should CCP tinker with mineral content each time there is a trend change in order to keep the ISK/hr figures where you want them?[/quote] Fair question indeed. Although its off topic from ...
- by Javajunky - at 2013.03.23 21:41:00
|
7. Mining: Working As Intended - in Science and Industry [original thread]
CCP had the best intentions were made with the Drone Regions change. I remember watching the stream where they said they wanted mining to be valuable again. It was progress but I think a little polish is in order. Getting this giant ABC's out of t...
- by Javajunky - at 2013.03.23 14:40:00
|
8. Mining: Working As Intended - in Science and Industry [original thread]
The ISK m3 hour discussion is irrelevant to the general principle that mining is working as intended.
- by Javajunky - at 2013.03.23 13:15:00
|
9. Mining: Working As Intended - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Dave Stark wrote: Castor Narcissus wrote: more profitable than high sec. and just like that, with 5 words, you've demonstrated how clueless and stupid you are. high sec mining is the most lucrative area of eve to mine in, do the maths an...
- by Javajunky - at 2013.03.23 11:34:00
|
10. Mining: Working As Intended - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote: Posting in a stealth Goon Troll Thread to get more multi-Boxers (i.e. TARGETS) to subscribe. Yes because no one ever mines in Goonswarm lol. I've been an SI poster on the subject for years. Suck it. Suck it long tim...
- by Javajunky - at 2013.03.21 20:38:00
|
11. Mining: Working As Intended - in Science and Industry [original thread]
As a hardcore miner, IGÇÖve enjoyed and commented on a hundreds S&I posts, articles, and blogs related to the subject. I do not pretend to be good at much in the game of Eve, but IGÇÖve been an empire miner, a null sec miner and even a WH mine...
- by Javajunky - at 2013.03.21 18:12:00
|
12. CCP: We want a more interactive mining experience! - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Bots are no longer going to be the mining problem. Semi AFK mining is not a problem, you one or two account miners who sit on empire ice are nobodies. When CCP is going to make a change, CCP is going to think about the guys who really do the seri...
- by Javajunky - at 2013.03.13 23:36:00
|
13. CCP: We want a more interactive mining experience! - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Mining is working as intended. Ok people, move it along, just another pubbie moron. Just another ADHD PVP player wanting something they will do for 5 minute and get bored. Leave the things that take focus, requires math, patience and fortitude t...
- by Javajunky - at 2013.03.08 02:48:00
|
14. Possible solution to afk miners - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Bugsy VanHalen wrote: TheSkeptic wrote: Stigman Zuwadza wrote: *tongue in cheek* AFK cloaking is not the problem, prolonged cloaking has no counter and is a risk free activity, ergo it needs a counter or some associated risk. Fly safe...
- by Javajunky - at 2012.10.12 20:37:00
|
15. Possible solution to afk miners - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Congratulations you have trained "I don't know what I'm talking about" to Level 5. This skill book is not bought but blessed and automatically installed by the masses who sign up to play eve. This skill book is typically found under the Industry...
- by Javajunky - at 2012.10.11 19:28:00
|
16. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
I am not sure why this thread lives on - I do laugh though. Take it in another direction, T2 Invention gives you a 0.5% chance to create a T2 BPO - there, I fixed it for you. Creative opportunities for others to acquire one without having to sp...
- by Javajunky - at 2012.09.05 18:29:00
|
17. A Question for you Pl industrialists .... - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Dust will have the ability to impact a handful of planets at best. CCP is not going to put a basic mechanic of the Eve Cash cow at risk for some Free to Play crap (yes FPS is simply crap and front what people that I know who are playing DUST 514 i...
- by Javajunky - at 2012.08.30 13:16:00
|
18. Just an idea to transform the mining experience - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Mining is working as intended. If you are ADHD emo, gotta have it now type - there is a reason you don't like mining. Pleaes stay away from my craft and I shall not tell you how to fit your ships. Capiche. Long Story Short - Your opinion is wrong.
- by Javajunky - at 2012.08.25 15:02:00
|
19. The reality - miners make 60+m isk per hour of gameplay - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Ginger Barbarella wrote: You want to talk reality? OK, how's this? I bill $150 US$ per hour to work on stuff for my clients on the side. I do that while AFK mining. What do I make in one hour? $150/$35 per GTC = 4 GTC (rounded down) = 8 PLEX, p...
- by Javajunky - at 2012.08.25 04:05:00
|
20. Hulk nerf - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Aaron Younger wrote: Stuff . Get back to me when you've got more than 10 accounts.
- by Javajunky - at 2012.08.08 19:53:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |