Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 |
181. CCP: 5 ways fight update? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I wish.
- by JitaPriceChecker2 - at 2012.05.09 22:20:00
|
182. The Pros and Cons of Removing Static Belts. A discussion - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Roime wrote: A really dynamic, responsive New Eden is my favourite pipe dream There's so much room for development in this area. Economy (taxes, customs fees), industrial and residential development (NPC-built structures and traffic), syst...
- by JitaPriceChecker2 - at 2012.05.09 11:24:00
|
183. The Pros and Cons of Removing Static Belts. A discussion - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Roime wrote: Just make resources deplete over time. New Eden needs more dynamic, evolutional mechanics. After months, the most mined systems would be void of asteroids, and would take months before new belts would start to form. Same with m...
- by JitaPriceChecker2 - at 2012.05.09 10:43:00
|
184. Sentry carriers - the future of isk printing - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
More carriers to kill ?? Awesome.
- by JitaPriceChecker2 - at 2012.05.07 19:22:00
|
185. Players of high sec - CCP is trolling you and laughing while doing it. A propo... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Saia Tae Arragosa wrote: Darth Gustav wrote: If high-sec is supposed to be an alternative to 24/7 war, WTF ARE THERE WAR MECHANICS IN-GAME AND WHY IS CCP REVISITING THESE RULES? The people of null and high-sec come together all the time to ...
- by JitaPriceChecker2 - at 2012.05.07 19:12:00
|
186. Why are miners more important than... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Mining barges in 0.0 and lo-sec are potential targets which brings a lot of pvp opportunities for both attackers and defenders.
- by JitaPriceChecker2 - at 2012.05.07 19:07:00
|
187. Darwinism Died with Eve? How Space Ship Engineers Never Learned to Adapt - And ... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Alara IonStorm wrote: Business 101. Guy buys Mining Ship > Mining Ship is destroyed > Guy buys new Mining Ship. They don't have much incentive to put money into designing something when everyone just keeps buying new current Mining Ship...
- by JitaPriceChecker2 - at 2012.05.07 11:41:00
|
188. DOWN WITH LOCAL! It will lead to a buff in mining ships in days! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Posting in another local is broken thread, which i agree with.
- by JitaPriceChecker2 - at 2012.05.05 07:37:00
|
189. Why force your play style on others? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Saia Tae Arragosa wrote: Why force your play style on others? I do not understand this drive from some players of EVE that think their style of playing the game is the only way. Who cares if some people wish to play in high sec? If you wish to ...
- by JitaPriceChecker2 - at 2012.05.04 11:12:00
|
190. 4.29 billion reasons why CCP loves the Goons lol... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Goonswarm online working as intended . Tech nerf isnt coming neither.
- by JitaPriceChecker2 - at 2012.05.04 11:07:00
|
191. [PROPOSAL] NEX Items - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Scrap NEX
- by JitaPriceChecker2 - at 2012.05.04 11:04:00
|
192. CCP technetium !!!!!!!!!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Polly Oxford wrote: Too bad the biggest proponent of a Tech Nerf on the CSM had to step down ^^ So he kept proponning but that was just a show. Technetium should be revamped long time ago, but there is no sign of it being touched by CCP.
- by JitaPriceChecker2 - at 2012.05.03 10:02:00
|
193. New War Dec Prices on Test - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
4,2 billions to war dec goons. This is madness.
- by JitaPriceChecker2 - at 2012.05.03 09:17:00
|
194. Anniversary Presents - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
ModeratedToSilence wrote: JitaPriceChecker2 wrote: They suck You come across as a self entitled douche bag. The same self entitled douche bag who has previously argued that high sec should be pvp free, that gankers should be banned, that ...
- by JitaPriceChecker2 - at 2012.05.02 22:06:00
|
195. Anniversary Presents - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
silens vesica wrote: No gifts for YOU. No loss for me
- by JitaPriceChecker2 - at 2012.05.02 20:57:00
|
196. Anniversary Presents - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
THE L0CK wrote: Shut up no face Why ? They dont suck ?
- by JitaPriceChecker2 - at 2012.05.02 20:47:00
|
197. Anniversary Presents - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
They suck
- by JitaPriceChecker2 - at 2012.05.02 20:41:00
|
198. New "improved" Concord? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
The only way out of this madness is letting capsullers police them selves, perhaps with a little help of npc's/ Sheriffs and stuff
- by JitaPriceChecker2 - at 2012.05.02 20:39:00
|
199. CCP technetium !!!!!!!!!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Weaselior wrote: JitaPriceChecker2 wrote: Weaselior wrote: i think you should spend less time calling people dense No well you see, people might not take your accusations other people are dense when you've been posting up a storm a...
- by JitaPriceChecker2 - at 2012.05.01 16:39:00
|
200. CCP technetium !!!!!!!!!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Oh btw technetium 213k
- by JitaPriceChecker2 - at 2012.05.01 16:30:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |