Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 |
101. Invention is Borken!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Kirisi, the national troll union of eve has voted overwhelmingly to not only refuse a second review of your complaint but also to kick your awful a$$ out of our club.
- by Jovialmadness - at 2010.06.15 00:57:00
|
102. It will take 48 years to recoup my PI investment - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Edited by: Jovialmadness on 11/06/2010 04:42:58 Question. When you day "fixed", do you mean make it so you make 100 million a day with PI? PI has a bigger purpose than just another carebear money making venture. Level 4's? So if you think t...
- by Jovialmadness - at 2010.06.11 04:42:00
|
103. Stealth T2 BPO Nerf With Tyrannis....Kind Of - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Confirming tech 2 bpo haterz are all throwing a party to celebrate atleast something is happening to all of our evil prints.
- by Jovialmadness - at 2010.05.21 14:36:00
|
104. Petition tofix T2 BPO's issue - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Originally by: XscarX Great Lolz from the rich guys who say the majority of t2 bpos have been bought on the forums Please feed more propaganda. The real isk prints have stayed in the owners hands as they are not true isk prints these littl...
- by Jovialmadness - at 2010.05.08 23:01:00
|
105. So whats the speculation on decryptors post expansion. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
"Yes ghoest but in the end you are an inquisitive ******ed little muppet that needs to not post anymore." I think that's what he was trying to say.
- by Jovialmadness - at 2010.05.06 00:45:00
|
106. Whats the issue over T2 BPO's? - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Originally by: TheBlueMonkey I think we found our perfect solution, CCP create a "uber dark secretz" character that's not known to be a CCP char. This char then buys up as many bpos as possible, given it has access to infinate isk, what ...
- by Jovialmadness - at 2010.04.30 14:48:00
|
107. Whats the issue over T2 BPO's? - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Edited by: Jovialmadness on 29/04/2010 18:41:49 Edited by: Jovialmadness on 29/04/2010 18:37:50 Akita, I say this with all honesty, you are smart and you "get it". Even though you aren't 100% a supporter of the current bpo situation I comm...
- by Jovialmadness - at 2010.04.29 18:37:00
|
108. Whats the issue over T2 BPO's? - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Edited by: Jovialmadness on 29/04/2010 18:16:27 Originally by: Cang Zar Edited by: Cang Zar on 29/04/2010 17:54:01 Originally by: Jovialmadness Hugahugahugahuga?!?! Ook, Ook, Ook?!? Mook, mook, mook!!! naaaarrruf-naaaaarrru...
- by Jovialmadness - at 2010.04.29 18:08:00
|
109. Whats the issue over T2 BPO's? - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Yea cang you are missing some glaring points. 1. Almost NONE of the current bpo holders now are the original owners. This statement ends up in every damn one of these threads. It blows your idea they are attainable only through permission out of ...
- by Jovialmadness - at 2010.04.29 16:22:00
|
110. Whats the issue over T2 BPO's? - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Edited by: Jovialmadness on 29/04/2010 15:29:52 Edited by: Jovialmadness on 29/04/2010 15:29:10 *Gouges his eyes out* ok so once again we defenders of common sense set out clear and concise explanations of what is going on. The defenders...
- by Jovialmadness - at 2010.04.29 15:29:00
|
111. more SisiHard numbers from PI - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Originally by: TheBlueMonkey Originally by: Venkul Mul From the comments I have seen on the resources values It's a player driven market, so, when all the muppets swarm to pi watch as all the resource prices drop like a stone...
- by Jovialmadness - at 2010.04.27 15:12:00
|
112. Planetary Interaction land grab? - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Originally by: TheBlueMonkey Edited by: TheBlueMonkey on 23/04/2010 14:38:37 I don't think it's fair....
- by Jovialmadness - at 2010.04.23 14:56:00
|
113. I love T2 BPO's - in Science and Industry [original thread]
I basically did the same as you bro. Took years but I finally have 7 ship and module bpo's. People could use a good dose of ambition and maybe we wouldn't have to get on here and fight.
- by Jovialmadness - at 2010.04.22 17:48:00
|
114. Petition tofix T2 BPO's issue - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Edited by: Jovialmadness on 20/04/2010 03:00:22 Edited by: Jovialmadness on 20/04/2010 02:58:41 Originally by: LHA Tarawa Originally by: Joe SMASH Seriously.... Do we need another damn T2 BPO topic? DO WE? Have they be...
- by Jovialmadness - at 2010.04.20 02:56:00
|
115. Petition tofix T2 BPO's issue - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Edited by: Jovialmadness on 19/04/2010 16:25:59 Originally by: Robert Caldera Originally by: Jovialmadness Until then tech 2 bpo's will not be removed and the whiners will still be eating my scraps. I dont believe you have ...
- by Jovialmadness - at 2010.04.19 16:24:00
|
116. Petition tofix T2 BPO's issue - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Originally by: Robert Caldera Originally by: Jovialmadness to put them in their lower class place and make sure they stay there diservedly. he admitted finally T2 BPOs should be removed If one of these gentleman actually a...
- by Jovialmadness - at 2010.04.19 16:03:00
|
117. Whats the issue over T2 BPO's? - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Sure I'll give you the issue. Tech 2 bpo's are expensive. The whiners are poor. They want them but don't have the ambition to achieve anything to aquire them. They would rather have them removed instead of trying to get them. Most of them are pr...
- by Jovialmadness - at 2010.04.19 15:51:00
|
118. Petition tofix T2 BPO's issue - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Edited by: Jovialmadness on 19/04/2010 15:41:36 Originally by: Louis deGuerre Originally by: Jovialmadness Evil tech 2 bpo holder checking in. I am done giving complicated responses to you jealous whining little pricks. Not ON...
- by Jovialmadness - at 2010.04.19 15:40:00
|
119. Rumormill: Possible T2 BPO nerf? - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Originally by: Ghoest Originally by: Akita T Originally by: Ghoest EVE has rules. The rules are generally consistent. The vestigial BPOs are not consistent with the current game. They are unfair. Explain in great detail ...
- by Jovialmadness - at 2010.04.19 15:34:00
|
120. Petition tofix T2 BPO's issue - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Evil tech 2 bpo holder checking in. I am done giving complicated responses to you jealous whining little pricks. Not ONCE has a actual proof been given which would result in the needed removal of tech two bpo's. No proof that is except that proof...
- by Jovialmadness - at 2010.04.19 15:22:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |