Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 |
161. A tech 2 bpo socialism story - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Edited by: Jovialmadness on 17/03/2010 02:23:27 Quote: Your reasoning flawed You continue to type please stop typing now you need to be able to reason first. simply hopping in here...reading a post..and then typing that is laughable....
- by Jovialmadness - at 2010.03.17 02:23:00
|
162. A tech 2 bpo socialism story - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Edited by: Jovialmadness on 17/03/2010 01:54:20 nice post bro. edit: i heard in on AM radio about 3 years ago on news talk radio while sitting in the parking lot of one of the plants i covered.
- by Jovialmadness - at 2010.03.17 01:50:00
|
163. A tech 2 bpo socialism story - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Edited by: Jovialmadness on 17/03/2010 01:43:49 ok let me put it to you this way. i have more isk than you and im super rich. please place whine below this line. i burn isk in my fire place because its cheaper for me to do that then sit down...
- by Jovialmadness - at 2010.03.17 01:40:00
|
164. A tech 2 bpo socialism story - in Science and Industry [original thread]
You will see what you want to see just like all the whine squad. This post was meant to bolster my team and shun the others off so be so kind as to move along. Your blatant ignorance of the current topics Infesting the very sub forum you are posti...
- by Jovialmadness - at 2010.03.17 00:50:00
|
165. A tech 2 bpo socialism story - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Xeno it has everything to do with them you aren't "getting" the current issues if you can't see it. 0/10 for you
- by Jovialmadness - at 2010.03.16 22:54:00
|
166. A tech 2 bpo socialism story - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Edited by: Jovialmadness on 16/03/2010 22:30:34 Actually happened. Economics professor and his class early in the semester up in i believe north u.s.(been awhile since i heard it on the news radio so cant remember the school) were discussing ...
- by Jovialmadness - at 2010.03.16 22:30:00
|
167. Why is the game better with T2 BPOs than it would be without them? - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Quote: My unforgivable sin is that I discovered EVE 6 months ago instead of 4 years ago. Oh, what an evil, evil person I am. That sin justifies that I forever after be punished with a competative disadvantage. Those greater than me, that dis...
- by Jovialmadness - at 2010.03.16 22:14:00
|
168. Why is the game better with T2 BPOs than it would be without them? - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Quote: Now, show me ONE post I've made where I've used the word "fair". For me it is not about fairness. It is about long-term shaping the sandbox. What shape do we want the castles to be? Few very large and powerful alliances with special ...
- by Jovialmadness - at 2010.03.16 22:08:00
|
169. The real problem with T2 BPOs. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Quote: Truth be told, my "larger goal" is (and from what CCP has stated) to remove the competative advantages that result in few, very rich and powerful ubber alliances and create a much more fluid environment where alliances eb and flow, co...
- by Jovialmadness - at 2010.03.16 22:00:00
|
170. For the t2 BPO whiners - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Quote: Admit they are a huge advantage, and that advantage itself become the justification for their removal hey genius. if i blow you up in your zealot and im in my curse you cant go running off to ccp begging for reimbursment because i...
- by Jovialmadness - at 2010.03.16 21:53:00
|
171. The real problem with T2 BPOs. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Edited by: Jovialmadness on 16/03/2010 21:42:49 Quote: If it is such a tiny advantage, then why do the ubber piowerful alliances spend tens of billions or more to get thier hands on these extremely valuable items? If it is such a tiny a...
- by Jovialmadness - at 2010.03.16 21:42:00
|
172. Why is the game better with T2 BPOs than it would be without them? - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Edited by: Jovialmadness on 16/03/2010 21:35:41 Edited by: Jovialmadness on 16/03/2010 21:35:22 Edited by: Jovialmadness on 16/03/2010 21:34:44 Quote: I think there are many DAMN good reasons to remove them. The competative advan...
- by Jovialmadness - at 2010.03.16 21:33:00
|
173. The real problem with T2 BPOs. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Quote: Better solution. Exchange all T2 BPOs with enough matching BPCs to total a couple years' manufacturing time. It will take years to level the playing field, but eventually it will get there. this immediately forces the holders to d...
- by Jovialmadness - at 2010.03.16 18:40:00
|
174. For the t2 BPO whiners - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Very true monkey and on top of that, as rare as they are, they are desired by everyone for the most part and until he jokingly made that statement I never heard of a campaign for their removal due to how unfair they were because of rarity.
- by Jovialmadness - at 2010.03.16 18:22:00
|
175. Why is the game better with T2 BPOs than it would be without them? - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Edited by: Jovialmadness on 16/03/2010 18:14:17 Quote: My unforgivable sin is that I discovered EVE 6 months ago instead of 4 years ago. Oh, what an evil, evil person I am. That sin justifies that I forever after be punished with a compe...
- by Jovialmadness - at 2010.03.16 18:13:00
|
176. Why is the game better with T2 BPOs than it would be without them? - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Fine. Since I already said it I'll copy paste. 1. The game is functioning fine as is with bpo production and invention coinciding. The only people complaining about them are entry level/low level inventors and those that do not have them...usuall...
- by Jovialmadness - at 2010.03.16 17:58:00
|
177. For the t2 BPO whiners - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Quote: Originally by: Bluebeard I haven't got a State Issue Raven CCP only issued 1 or 2 of them and then stopped. (This proves that they were released as a mistake) These ships are literally worth 100s of billions of isk. I demand that CC...
- by Jovialmadness - at 2010.03.16 17:47:00
|
178. For the t2 BPO whiners - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Straight up empty lies. The arguement has been made time and time again as to why T2 bpo's are fine. Shall I divulge them again? Once I do I want your apology. 1. The game is functioning fine as is with bpo production and invention coinciding. Th...
- by Jovialmadness - at 2010.03.16 17:32:00
|
179. For the t2 BPO whiners - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Lord fitz, far be it for me to disagree with you do make good points. I do agree there are t2 bpo's out there that would fit into your thoughts but there are, as you say, some that make reasonable profits unfortunately not as good as pre-invention...
- by Jovialmadness - at 2010.03.16 16:05:00
|
180. For the t2 BPO whiners - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Average of 3 years.
- by Jovialmadness - at 2010.03.16 12:39:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |