Pages: [1] 2 |
1. [CSM] November 2010 Prioritization Crowdsourcing - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Kerfira,13,56,58,102,124,133,144,160,201 Originally by: CCP Wrangler EVE isn't designed to just look like a cold, dark and harsh world, it's designed to be a cold, dark and harsh world.
- by Kerfira - at 2010.11.24 18:13:00
|
2. [Proposal] "Align fleet to" option - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Edited by: Kerfira on 23/09/2009 17:29:21 Definitely not supported! What is the next you'll ask for? That you can target and focus fire for ships in the fleet? Good FC's and alliances manage to get their people to follow orders, and benefit ...
- by Kerfira - at 2009.09.23 17:28:00
|
3. [NEEDED!] Dedicated salvager - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Tchell Dahhn If you're going to get a bonus to tractor range and speed, this means I'm going to be able to salvage faster, and that's always going to make me more ISK. You make the (false) assumption that prices will stay...
- by Kerfira - at 2008.12.16 18:40:00
|
4. [NEEDED!] Dedicated salvager - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Fafnir Weilandson However I think a new T2 Destroyer that gets cargo bonus, salvage success bonus and tractor bonus would be a fantastic move towards making the "salvager" profession even more profitable and to become more c...
- by Kerfira - at 2008.12.16 13:10:00
|
5. [NEEDED!] Dedicated salvager - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Even if you get a dedicated salvage ship, you'll not earn more money! The reason is very simple.... If it gets easier, more people will do it, and prices will drop as the demand doesn't increase! In the end, you'll end up earning the same ISK/ho...
- by Kerfira - at 2008.12.16 13:09:00
|
6. A Call for Transparency regarding the Reaction/POS Exploit - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Bunyip Ferrogel will probably never return to the price it is now, but if it gets too high, CCP will take action to normalize it to ensure the game doesn't shatter. Remember that the game didn't 'shatter' when T2 prices w...
- by Kerfira - at 2008.12.15 19:49:00
|
7. Petition to Change Missile Nerf launched for Quantum Rise Expansion - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Riga Mortiss /signed with Alacrity!!... this nerf HAS to be revisited ... Caldari are now broken and those of us who specced missiles as a primary weapon have wasted a lot of time and money. CCP even states that Missiles ar...
- by Kerfira - at 2008.12.15 18:25:00
|
8. New Faction Cruisers - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
The only effect you get from making something easier is that more people will do it, thus diluting the profits from what is done. The only thing a dedicated loot/salvage ship will do is ensure that more people will loot and salvage, meaning more ...
- by Kerfira - at 2008.12.15 18:21:00
|
9. Skill Refunds - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
No. You make your choice and live with the consequences! Originally by: CCP Wrangler EVE isn't designed to just look like a cold, dark and harsh world, it's designed to be a cold, dark and harsh world.
- by Kerfira - at 2008.12.14 12:57:00
|
10. CCP vs CSM this weekend... - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Quote: Question to CCP: What does CCP plan to do about the economic backlash this has created? TBH, this incident has created a short-term market instability with lots of speculation going on, but in the long term there isn't anything tha...
- by Kerfira - at 2008.12.14 12:51:00
|
11. [Request] Bring back the alliance tournament! - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Seems CCP has made their mind up on this.... The tournament forum has been removed Originally by: CCP Wrangler EVE isn't designed to just look like a cold, dark and harsh world, it's designed to be a cold, dark and harsh world.
- by Kerfira - at 2008.10.24 07:36:00
|
12. [Request] Bring back the alliance tournament! - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Oh yeah!!!! (about freakin' time too) Originally by: CCP Wrangler EVE isn't designed to just look like a cold, dark and harsh world, it's designed to be a cold, dark and harsh world.
- by Kerfira - at 2008.10.18 07:40:00
|
13. [Request] Make all 3 characters per account trainable at the same time - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Edited by: Kerfira on 18/10/2008 07:37:07 This has been suggested numerous times in the past, and the answer from CCP has always been a VERY firm 'No!'. The reason is that this would hugely increase character farming, and make training much e...
- by Kerfira - at 2008.10.18 07:35:00
|
14. [Issue] Stop All SP&RP Gain From Expired Accounts. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Fully supported! Originally by: CCP Wrangler EVE isn't designed to just look like a cold, dark and harsh world, it's designed to be a cold, dark and harsh world.
- by Kerfira - at 2008.10.15 13:19:00
|
15. [Issue]Capital smart bomb's we need them - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
There are already 4 capital smartbombs in the game..... Aurora ominae Gjallarhorn Judgement Oblivion I think that's enough Originally by: CCP Wrangler EVE isn't designed to just look like a cold, dark and harsh world, it's designed to ...
- by Kerfira - at 2008.10.15 13:12:00
|
16. Issue - Missioning - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Best solution to the problem would be to remove the effect of the Q-level and of the system security level of the system from the LP/ISK rewards paid out by the agent. Instead implement a multiplier like this: High-sec: 1x Low-sec: 2x 0.0: 3x Th...
- by Kerfira - at 2008.10.01 18:06:00
|
17. [Issue] Change of policy on reimbursement claims - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Edited by: Kerfira on 01/10/2008 17:53:57 Not signed! There are already TOO many caps in EVE. If anything should be done, caps should not be insurable or reimbursable. If you bring them (or any other ship) into a lag-fest, that's your own pr...
- by Kerfira - at 2008.10.01 17:53:00
|
18. [IDEA] REMOVE THE LOCAL - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
While I agree with the problem, I think the remedy is the wrong one. There are several reasons: 1. 0.0 attractiveness Income in 0.0 (moon mining excluded) is not much higher (if at all) than L4 mission running in high-sec when you take everything...
- by Kerfira - at 2008.08.09 18:18:00
|
19. [Issue] Specific Adjustments to 0.0 Sovereignty Combat - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Whatever solution there is for the sovereignty problems, it has nothing to do with MORE shooting/repping of structures. It'll NOT encourage fights any more than current status as people will STILL bring a blob. Why? Because they don't risk loosin...
- by Kerfira - at 2008.08.05 20:00:00
|
20. [Issue] Specific Proposal for 0.0 Sovereignty Revamp - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Matrixcvd With this, no major changes to SOV need to take place. 0.0 becomes a constant battle ground. All is good. No.... It becomes an even more constant shoot/repair-structure-ground.... Whatever solution there is for...
- by Kerfira - at 2008.08.05 19:58:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |