Pages: [1] 2 3 |
1. Sticky:Dev Blog: Alliance Logos & You - Clarification on submission... - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Or if you need to say the same thing in 5000 words and 180 paragraphs and subsections, do what Weaselior said. It's why 99% of all EULAs use the exact same wording.
- by Khanh'rhh - at 2014.04.25 14:13:00
|
2. Sticky:Dev Blog: Alliance Logos & You - Clarification on submission... - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
CCP Falcon wrote: Ortho Loess wrote: I don't really understand what CCP legal are trying to do here. I can't speak for CCP legal of course, as they'll have to communicate with you directly. I've released news today that's put alliance ...
- by Khanh'rhh - at 2014.04.25 14:09:00
|
3. Sticky:Dev Blog: Alliance Logos & You - Clarification on submission... - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Arkady Romanov wrote: Fredlah wrote: I love this. If people thought goons were bad enough already, now they have lawyerswarm to picture... fatbee with a suit and a briefcase, anybody? It's been done You god damn fool. You linked tha...
- by Khanh'rhh - at 2014.02.15 12:42:00
|
4. Sticky:Dev Blog: Alliance Logos & You - Clarification on submission... - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
James Amril-Kesh wrote: No, you don't need ownership. Whoever told you that was lying. When you're billing by the hour, it helps to give very long, complex answers, ideally needing re-drafting and re-checking after one or two rounds of rebut...
- by Khanh'rhh - at 2014.02.14 14:48:00
|
5. Sticky:Dev Blog: Alliance Logos & You - Clarification on submission... - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
CCP Falcon wrote: Kismeteer wrote: Why are you going after goonswarm's logo? In your list of example logos, all of these are dead groups. That is, except for Goonswarm's, which lives on under Goonswarm Federation. And I know that someone pa...
- by Khanh'rhh - at 2014.02.14 14:43:00
|
6. Sticky:Dev Blog: Alliance Logos & You - Clarification on submission... - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Weaselior wrote: i am starting to discover a love for my new favorite ccpism, the Clarification(TM) Personally I'm awaiting the re-clarification of the re-wording of the re-clarification before I pass too much comment. Those have been the be...
- by Khanh'rhh - at 2014.02.13 23:11:00
|
7. Sticky:Dev Blog: The Bloodbath of B-R5RB, GamingGÇÖs Most Destructive Bat... - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote: CCP Dolan wrote: Zhentar wrote: How many titans are left, if 75 were killed? The total used to get published in the QEN but I don't recall if we have seen a recent number? Nope, and you likely won't be seeing n...
- by Khanh'rhh - at 2014.01.30 00:14:00
|
8. Sticky:Dev blog: More Deployables from Super Friends - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Also, Soniclover, of course the amount of ISK pouring out of nullsec bounties is very high in comparison, since it's the faucet that balances the LP sinks that dominate other income streams (Missions / incursions). The way you can get a handle o...
- by Khanh'rhh - at 2014.01.16 12:13:00
|
9. Sticky:Dev blog: More Deployables from Super Friends - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Rek Seven wrote: Whatever. I'm looking forward to the possibility of having more fights in null and if a measly 5% reduction causes some people to move to high sec, who cares? It's not like these people are adding anything to the game anyway. ...
- by Khanh'rhh - at 2014.01.16 12:09:00
|
10. Sticky:Dev blog: More Deployables from Super Friends - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
It must suck to work at CCP. They've designed something that, if used, results in 100-105% of the current ISK faucet being in place. However, one stated design goal of the unit is to reduce ISK entering the system, meaning it needs to be designed ...
- by Khanh'rhh - at 2014.01.16 03:00:00
|
11. Sticky:CSM Guest Blog: "Reasonable Things" Voting Phase - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Khanh'rhh, 13, 12, 33, 30, 04, 02, 20, 22
- by Khanh'rhh - at 2013.08.02 13:56:00
|
12. Sticky:Dev blog: You have insulted my honor - I demand satisfaction! Dueling com... - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
How many developer hours were spent on this? How many developer hours do you think it would take to fix just the most egregious elements of POS management (such as adding manageable access lists to a SMA)? Do you see the problem, here? It might...
- by Khanh'rhh - at 2013.01.17 16:37:00
|
13. Sticky:New dev blog: Upcoming Tutorial Revisions - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
CCP Greyscale wrote: Khanh'rhh wrote: If I read the graph right, most people leave whilst being shown the Captains Quarters part of the game? How is this a surprise? "EvE is WHEEEE spaceships! PEW PEW! Massive sandbox! But .... well, here i...
- by Khanh'rhh - at 2012.07.30 16:37:00
|
14. Sticky:New dev blog: Upcoming Tutorial Revisions - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
If I read the graph right, most people leave whilst being shown the Captains Quarters part of the game? How is this a surprise? "EvE is WHEEEE spaceships! PEW PEW! Massive sandbox! But .... well, here is a room where you can do absolutely nothing...
- by Khanh'rhh - at 2012.07.30 15:24:00
|
15. Sticky:New dev blog: Inferno 1.1 Changes To the War Dec System - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
olan2005 wrote: This is just futher proof that devs are siding with goons . The only change that should be made is if you delcare the war mutual you loose youre allies. P.S when is the tech nerf comin So your sense of impartiality says "this...
- by Khanh'rhh - at 2012.06.21 18:10:00
|
16. Sticky:New dev blog: Inferno 1.1 Changes To the War Dec System - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
None ofthe Above wrote: But you did notice "- Corps can only bind to one ally" right? I like the rest of it, but that seems a bit restrictive That's really the heart of my proposed solution. I have no issue with 10, 100 or 1000 corps decidi...
- by Khanh'rhh - at 2012.06.21 18:09:00
|
17. Sticky:New dev blog: Inferno 1.1 Changes To the War Dec System - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Jade Constantine wrote: Perhaps so, but I suspect the same people whining about the defensive ally "dogpile" consequence would still moan about treaty-dogpiling if it turned out that wardecs turned sour when too many people alligned with the de...
- by Khanh'rhh - at 2012.06.21 15:48:00
|
18. Sticky:New dev blog: Inferno 1.1 Changes To the War Dec System - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Jade Constantine wrote: You could try quoting all of it. The whole point of me linking a balanced article was that its well "balanced" if you are going to selective quote only the parts that suit your bias then you kinda defeat the object - le...
- by Khanh'rhh - at 2012.06.21 15:44:00
|
19. Sticky:New dev blog: Inferno 1.1 Changes To the War Dec System - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
I'll quote the guy who you said is debunking Soundwave saying it "shouldn't be fair" because this is really funny.... Mabrick wrote: Now, before you get yourself all worked up because CCP is favoring Goonswarm again, think it through. They NEED...
- by Khanh'rhh - at 2012.06.21 13:18:00
|
20. Sticky:New dev blog: Inferno 1.1 Changes To the War Dec System - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
It's a bit early to be joking about being a rabid conspirator, when you're still posting such.
- by Khanh'rhh - at 2012.06.21 13:14:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |