| Pages: [1] 2 3 |
1. Naglfar, Captial Projectile Turrets and Citadel Torpedos - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
While I agree that Tactical Shield Manipulation V never should have been required, shafting those people that trained this otherwise useless Rank 4 skill doesn't seem like the solution. If you're going to remove it as a requirement then you also n...
- by Kwint Sommer - at 2009.05.19 01:26:00
|
2. The Pattern Clarc effects feedback threads - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I know it's off topic but threads like this really emphasize why you need to run for a second term. I swear, you have more attention for the finer points of EvE than most of the devs.
- by Kwint Sommer - at 2009.03.08 00:41:00
|
3. Carrier increase - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
They're supposed to be able to carry ammo and charges while in the ship's maintenance bay but I haven't gotten on Sisi to confirm that yet. ___________________________________________ 5% Mining Implants & 5% Manufacturing Implants *From 110M to 1...
- by Kwint Sommer - at 2007.12.03 22:59:00
|
4. Petition for carriers and moms to stay the way they are. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Nyack not signed! carriers needs a good nerfing.. they deploy far to fast and can hit smaller ships to good without support.. i want to be able to use BS in 0,0 again.. no way people will use t2 bs when a carrier can own a w...
- by Kwint Sommer - at 2007.11.28 07:24:00
|
5. New graphics content on singularity? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Sokor Jei My head literally just exploded. Pictures?
- by Kwint Sommer - at 2007.11.19 11:10:00
|
6. CCP: What ARENT you nerfing so I know what to train? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Gericault m0id Shuttle I think is a safe bet. Honestly, everything will be 'nerfed' sooner or later and people just find different uber-pwn setups. There is always a better setup - flying an 'uber' ship with 'uber' setup i...
- by Kwint Sommer - at 2007.11.15 07:50:00
|
7. Singularity: Jump freighters now on the market in FD-MLJ - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Bund The ****tiest part about seeing all those T2 capital parts is it means this is just the first of many T2 capital ships. My guess is after they've completely broken carriers and made them unusable they'll introduce...
- by Kwint Sommer - at 2007.11.06 09:27:00
|
8. Why Carriers will STILL be Preferred to Jump Freighters. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Rells The hull HP bonus for the freighters should be changed to a 10% additional cargo capacity bonus and a 20% reduction in size of minerals and ice products per level. If CCP continues on this route, the jump freig...
- by Kwint Sommer - at 2007.11.05 21:29:00
|
9. Petition for carriers and moms to stay the way they are. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Arlenna Molatov Gee, look at all these posts made by characters in noob corps less than 3 months old. Makes ya wonder how many ACTUAL players are here posting and how many alts just to inflate the numbers. ...... I'll a...
- by Kwint Sommer - at 2007.11.04 20:02:00
|
10. Maybe Nerfing Carriers / Moms Is a CCP Conspiracyŕ - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Admiral Nova Originally by: Samurai XII A good number of vets just left. What kind of vet leaves over a propsed change ? I know I'm sticking around to see it implemented before leaving. You make an excellent ...
- by Kwint Sommer - at 2007.11.03 08:09:00
|
11. This PvE'ers Take on the Golem - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Red Harvest Originally by: Futureface01 Many NPCs prefer to fight at 45-70km. Been running mission and hunting all kinds of NPCs for quite some time now and never ran into "many" such NPCs. I actually only rem...
- by Kwint Sommer - at 2007.11.03 07:47:00
|
12. Logistics != Tacklers - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I agree with CCP on this one, any ship that doesn't conform to its intended use is broken and needs to be fixed, preferably with a heavy swing from the nerf bat. Carriers are the worst offenders but there are many others, thanks OP for pointing ou...
- by Kwint Sommer - at 2007.10.31 22:19:00
|
13. Destroyers != Salvage boats - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I agree with CCP on this one, any ship that doesn't conform to its intended use is broken and needs to be fixed, preferably with a heavy swing from the nerf bat. Carriers are the worst offenders but there are many others, thanks OP for pointing ou...
- by Kwint Sommer - at 2007.10.31 22:19:00
|
14. Industrial != Combat ship - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I agree with CCP on this one, any ship that doesn't conform to its intended use is broken and needs to be fixed, preferably with a heavy swing from the nerf bat. Carriers are the worst offenders but there are many others, thanks OP for pointing ou...
- by Kwint Sommer - at 2007.10.31 21:30:00
|
15. Carriers != Mining vessels - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Eka Maladay Originally by: MotherMoon Originally by: Carsidava MotherMoon, you need to read the 13-page (or is it up to 14 now?) thread about the carrier nerf, where the CCP employee stated "Carrier != Hauler...
- by Kwint Sommer - at 2007.10.31 21:29:00
|
16. Petition for carriers and moms to stay the way they are. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Naviset Please lock this thread. Flogging the dead horse? Read the devblogs.. not nerfed yet. Complain later when they announce something. Do you understand why topics are locked? Either because they're inappropriate, du...
- by Kwint Sommer - at 2007.10.29 04:15:00
|
17. Petition for carriers and moms to stay the way they are. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Signed Sig removed. Please keep sigs to 400x120 pixels and 24000 bytes in size or less. -Kaemonn
- by Kwint Sommer - at 2007.10.23 08:52:00
|
18. carrier, moms nerf incoming - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
There are ways in which this could be done that would actually work. Under the current system if you were to just implement the suggested changes I think you would see alliances seriously asking how much they can reprocesses a Mothership for. I, ...
- by Kwint Sommer - at 2007.10.22 06:25:00
|
19. Most large guns using 100m3 space in Sisi? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Sailon eve is not real its unreal so why try to make unreal to real when its imbossible? this is stupidest thing ever 0.0 will be killed i dont wanna buy large guns which cost almost more than my ship now You're confuse...
- by Kwint Sommer - at 2007.10.11 14:24:00
|
20. Most large guns using 100m3 space in Sisi? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: CCP Chronotis What your seeing on sisi is just placeholders with a generic volume increase applied to around seventy modules, but in most cases it will not end up being that high (if changed at all) with the exception of som...
- by Kwint Sommer - at 2007.10.10 16:43:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |