Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
1. Law in EVE - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
- by Liafcipe9000 - at 2017.03.12 07:52:51
|
2. Nullification and Interdiction - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Steve Ronuken wrote: Should you be able to have nullified combat ships? Why, or why not? strategic cruisers already are. I find it hard to believe that there is any point to giving that feature to any other ships. Steve Ronuken wrote: Ho...
- by Liafcipe9000 - at 2017.02.14 07:41:15
|
3. Suicide Gankers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
and here we have the average bad idea thread. note that the OP has no idea what he is talking about.
- by Liafcipe9000 - at 2017.02.12 12:18:27
|
4. Sticky:[Carnyx] The Jackdaw - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
CCP Fozzie wrote: 15% reduction in missile launcher reload time per level. *slow clapping and sad laughter* GG Fozzie. G ****ING G. I LOVE YOU...
- by Liafcipe9000 - at 2015.05.20 05:45:16
|
5. Festival bombs - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Bagrat Skalski wrote: Jita - 1 frame per second - welcome to the party. I fully support this idea and any of its different iterations.
- by Liafcipe9000 - at 2015.05.07 08:33:02
|
6. Faction rigs! - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I see a shield rig and I want it painted black green also tl;dr your idea is lame urrrrrrrrrrrrrr
- by Liafcipe9000 - at 2015.04.16 13:36:59
|
7. Sticky:Skill Points remapping/buyingGäó: Ideas, Discussion, and Proposals - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Corraidhin Farsaidh wrote: Liafcipe9000 wrote: this thread still exists?! It's like > /dev/null for bad SP ideas
- by Liafcipe9000 - at 2015.04.16 13:34:45
|
8. Alliance hangars? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Any chance for Alliance hangars similar to Corp hangars?
- by Liafcipe9000 - at 2015.04.15 18:39:54
|
9. In-Space Implant Removal - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Jethro Winchester wrote: For the record Jethro WinchesterGäó honors all 1v1s and ransom payments. end of thread? I don't even. obligatory: u wot m8. 1v1 me on the sun. i'll rek u. yoloswag nolinks/logi.
- by Liafcipe9000 - at 2015.04.15 11:06:19
|
10. Let's talk about Capitals and Supercapitals - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Smegatron Achasse wrote: Allow supers to dock WHOA. WHOA. whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa. slow down.
- by Liafcipe9000 - at 2015.04.15 11:01:37
|
11. Let's talk about Capitals and Supercapitals - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Gremoxx wrote: Liafcipe9000 wrote: Iroquoiss Pliskin wrote: Carriers become the only platform able to fit Warfare links so you're basically suggesting that warfare links become completely irrelevant for most scenarios and almost irrelev...
- by Liafcipe9000 - at 2015.04.15 10:58:50
|
12. Let's talk about Capitals and Supercapitals - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Iroquoiss Pliskin wrote: The cancer that is OGB would be reduced to manageable levels, while still giving any fleets deploying them very generous benefits under korrekt risk-reward metrics. Pls no crying. a few things are wrong in your post...
- by Liafcipe9000 - at 2015.04.15 10:55:39
|
13. Introducing the soloist module: No fleet? No help? No problem. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
FT Cold wrote: Liafcipe9000 wrote: so... siege/bastion module for Garmur? also, nothing stopping people from flying together anyway. I don't really think that in a balanced form it would be as powerful as siege or bastion. The general...
- by Liafcipe9000 - at 2015.04.15 10:45:29
|
14. Let's talk about Capitals and Supercapitals - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Iroquoiss Pliskin wrote: Carriers become the only platform able to fit Warfare links so you're basically suggesting that warfare links become completely irrelevant for most scenarios and almost irrelevant for cap blob warfare? did I get it ri...
- by Liafcipe9000 - at 2015.04.15 07:39:26
|
15. Introducing the soloist module: No fleet? No help? No problem. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
so... siege/bastion module for Garmur?
- by Liafcipe9000 - at 2015.04.15 07:21:01
|
16. Missiles - the mother of all overhauls. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
person who does not understand missiles makes a long post trying to sound lik ehe understands missiles. two things I agree on: - Missiles having longer ranges than some turrets, for example artillery falloff range. - Missiles having no eWar coun...
- by Liafcipe9000 - at 2015.04.15 07:19:16
|
17. Sticky:Skill Points remapping/buyingGäó: Ideas, Discussion, and Proposals - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
this thread still exists?!
- by Liafcipe9000 - at 2015.04.14 11:28:45
|
18. Make all vanity items consumable - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Rivr Luzade wrote: AURum needs to be removed from the game. on that, we can agree.
- by Liafcipe9000 - at 2015.04.14 11:26:02
|
19. Make all vanity items consumable - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Rain6637 wrote: consumable, like SKINs and the Golden Pod umm... no.
- by Liafcipe9000 - at 2015.04.14 11:25:12
|
20. Sticky:[April] Confessor and Svipul Balance Tweaks - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
CCP Fozzie wrote: Hey everyone! Big thanks to everyone who has posted feedback about the first round of changes. We agree with the point that some of you were bringing up, that these first round of changes are a bit too harsh on long range weap...
- by Liafcipe9000 - at 2015.04.14 06:21:46
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |