| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
1. A crossroad of bad decisions (F2P) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Caco De'mon wrote: Winning at WoT or LoL means winning millions of dollars...is that what you are saying or would you like to change your post? A toxic community is born because people are sick of listening to entitled whiners that thrown tant...
- by Liang Nuren - at 2016.08.31 22:52:14
|
2. A crossroad of bad decisions (F2P) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Caco De'mon wrote: And what is the prize again for winning EVE? I forgot. Also, a new player now faces exactly the same hill vs vets with years in so, no idea what you're sobbing about.... Well, Caco, the prize for winning Eve is the same...
- by Liang Nuren - at 2016.08.31 22:17:52
|
3. A crossroad of bad decisions (F2P) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Pandora Carrollon wrote: I disagree that it will destroy motivation to stay subbed. You are severly limited by 5 mill SP cap and what is looking like a whole slew of skill caps. What it will destroy is people with multiple paid accounts that a...
- by Liang Nuren - at 2016.08.31 22:06:12
|
4. Is the patch being delayed? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ptraci wrote: PotatoOverdose wrote: Dinsdale Pirannha wrote: Why on earth would it be delayed? Because a tiny minority of the player base wants it to be???? Because of the most destructive battle in eve history? Seems like a good reason...
- by Liang Nuren - at 2014.01.28 06:35:00
|
5. A message everyone in HED-GP can come together about - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Align Planet1 wrote: Liang Nuren wrote: Align Planet1 wrote: Does Eve need sov mechanics? I suppose it would be possible to calculate de facto ownership via some complicated formula involving each kind of interaction in a system. Maybe...
- by Liang Nuren - at 2014.01.20 04:10:00
|
6. A message everyone in HED-GP can come together about - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Align Planet1 wrote: Does Eve need sov mechanics? Maybe. I think the psychological impact of ownership and investment is a very important aspect of the game. Removing sov means removing much of that sense of ownership and investment. You c...
- by Liang Nuren - at 2014.01.20 03:17:00
|
7. A message everyone in HED-GP can come together about - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Gizznitt Malikite wrote: Liang Nuren wrote: Gizznitt Malikite wrote: If CCP truly wants to address it, they need to implement a mechanic that moves people out of system when the server reaches a critical load. To do that in a fair-to-all...
- by Liang Nuren - at 2014.01.20 02:01:00
|
8. A message everyone in HED-GP can come together about - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Gizznitt Malikite wrote: If CCP truly wants to address it, they need to implement a mechanic that moves people out of system when the server reaches a critical load. To do that in a fair-to-all-sides manner is hard to implement, but without it...
- by Liang Nuren - at 2014.01.20 01:54:00
|
9. A message everyone in HED-GP can come together about - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Mah Boobz wrote: I wonder, if CCP hadn't spent all that money on Dust and WOD, and instead, put it into the Eve servers (were the money was made) if we could actually have the fights CCP brag about? No, there are absolute limits to scalabili...
- by Liang Nuren - at 2014.01.19 22:58:00
|
10. Is CCP building an EVE 2.0 engine? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
brutalbutneutral wrote: Rumors have it that new space is going to open up in comming expansions. My guess with all the TIDI that is happening in big fights CCP wants to use new technology (multithreaded EVE) for this space (or at least i hope s...
- by Liang Nuren - at 2014.01.09 00:42:00
|
11. Considering quitting eve , may drop my titan for people to kill for funz - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I'm kinda curious how you'd go about ensuring someone didn't drop a bunch of titans to kill your titan that you wanted killed with frigs? I don't doubt that it's possible... but it might be difficult? -Liang
- by Liang Nuren - at 2014.01.07 20:53:00
|
12. Interceptor Balance - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Malakai Asamov wrote: [ To highlight what i don't think is right is that in my skirmish linked stiletto running a faction point i can point out to 40km comfortably, heat to 60 something km for intial point and orbit at 5.5kms with a 70ish sig. ...
- by Liang Nuren - at 2014.01.06 04:20:00
|
13. Interceptor Balance - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Hasikan Miallok wrote: But lets be honest ... whatever ship is currently the best for small gangs will suddenly appear everywhere. If you nerfed inties something else will take their place. If you made assault frigate gangs the optimal way to ...
- by Liang Nuren - at 2014.01.06 03:31:00
|
14. LONG TIME no see (2008) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
James Amril-Kesh wrote: Liang Nuren wrote: If you're in null sec you're obviously in the intel channels already He's probably been kicked out of them. I meant, "broadcasted in the intel channels". Eg, don't ******* undock or you'll be n...
- by Liang Nuren - at 2014.01.06 03:29:00
|
15. LONG TIME no see (2008) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Well, I wouldn't go undocking a battleship in hostile null sec just quite yet. I'd jump clone back to high sec for a few days and try to get your feet back under you as far as actually moving ships around. Buy a frigate or cruiser and go run a cou...
- by Liang Nuren - at 2014.01.06 02:07:00
|
16. Would EVE be more fun without grinding? If all income was passive? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Diamond Zerg wrote: Hello. Do you think EVE would more fun if CCP made all income passive and removed the need for boring, repetitive tasks (which can be completed by a machine) like ratting and mining? Now, who gets the most passive income c...
- by Liang Nuren - at 2014.01.05 22:22:00
|
17. Like rats from a sinking ship! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I wouldn't say that 3-4 people going from one large game company to another large game company is all that exciting. I'm actually quite impressed at the time some of those people stayed at CCP considering Eve has been dying since 2003. /shrug On...
- by Liang Nuren - at 2014.01.05 21:12:00
|
18. Should we buff named guns? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Carmen Electra wrote: Heh, I think the bittervets do not want to see their 16m+ gunnery SP mitigated It's ok, I've got another 100M SP to mitigate your mitigation. Bring it. -Liang
- by Liang Nuren - at 2014.01.03 18:27:00
|
19. Should we buff named guns? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
James Amril-Kesh wrote: Liang Nuren wrote: Did they remove actual named guns (meta <= 4) or are you specifically referring to faction and officer guns? IMO, meta >= T2 should be able to use T2 ammo. That said, F&I is probably a goo...
- by Liang Nuren - at 2014.01.03 18:19:00
|
20. Should we buff named guns? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Did they remove actual named guns (meta <= 4) or are you specifically referring to faction and officer guns? IMO, meta >= T2 should be able to use T2 ammo. That said, F&I is probably a good plan for this. :) -Liang
- by Liang Nuren - at 2014.01.03 01:35:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |