| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 [90] 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 |
1781. Sticky:[Winter] Attack Cruisers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Roime wrote: So instead of banging my head to the wall, I adapt and fit shield tank. Even on the Myrm :S Shield Myrm, best Myrm. Always has been. Nano Shield Laser, Shield Gank Blaster, Passive Shield AC, Dual XL ASB, man the list just kee...
- by Liang Nuren - at 2012.09.27 15:53:00
|
1782. Oversized Afterburners - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
IHaveCandyGetInTheVan69 wrote: Liang Nuren wrote: The 100mn Talos is one of the best solo BCs I've ever flown. The tracking on those blasters is out of this world and the 25m^3 drone bay is simply amazing. I have 5 ready to go right now. :) ...
- by Liang Nuren - at 2012.09.26 22:03:00
|
1783. HEAVY MISSILES NERFED, switch to assault heavy missiles? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Vokradacka wrote: This change ill be bad for pvp missile ships (HAM\Torps are still not ussable + big nerf for HML+ TDs) BUT grat for PvE missile ships , TE\TC ill make torps great again . + now i can easily fit 50km HAM tengu with 1000+ dps ...
- by Liang Nuren - at 2012.09.26 18:14:00
|
1784. Oversized Afterburners - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
The 100mn Talos is one of the best solo BCs I've ever flown. The tracking on those blasters is out of this world and the 25m^3 drone bay is simply amazing. I have 5 ready to go right now. :) This video features a lot of 100mn Talos action and the...
- by Liang Nuren - at 2012.09.26 18:08:00
|
1785. what is your favorite assault frigate? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Praxis Ginimic wrote: If lasers are all about damage projection then what do you put in that utility high? It seems to me that that slot is reserved for in your face brawler fits. Nothing. -Liang Ed: I'm thinking about beams. With Pulse, y...
- by Liang Nuren - at 2012.09.25 21:19:00
|
1786. Sticky:[Winter] Attack Cruisers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Goldensaver wrote: Sigras wrote: this brings me to another issue, shield tanking is unbalanced against armor tanking. even the hurricane which has 4 mids and 6 lows is still usually a shield tanking ship, if it were 5/5 it would be no cont...
- by Liang Nuren - at 2012.09.25 21:02:00
|
1787. TD, TE, TS... I'm a missile guy, what'll those mean for me? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Lili Lu wrote: What it means is that you probably need to stop identifying your character as a "missile guy." Noone in this game should put all their eggs in one basket as far as weapon system or race of ships. It means you will have to decide ...
- by Liang Nuren - at 2012.09.23 04:35:00
|
1788. Sticky:[Winter] ORE frigate - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
CCP Ytterbium wrote: The bonuses multiply, thus its 2*1.25 = 2.5 boost at level 5. Thus the 2 bonused gas harvesters become 5. The ship was play tested in low-security gas sites - it's not necessarily made to tank null-security sites as ...
- by Liang Nuren - at 2012.09.21 18:21:00
|
1789. Sticky:[Winter] ORE frigate - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
A couple of questions, Ytterbium: - Does the 2 turrets become the equivalent of 5? - Have you play tested with it and determined that it can actually survive gas cloud harvesting? -Liang
- by Liang Nuren - at 2012.09.21 16:40:00
|
1790. Sticky:[Winter] Missile Rebalance + Hurricane tweak - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Syzygium wrote: Switch Explosion Velocity and Explosion Signature for HMs and HAMs and you will automatically buff HAMs slightly while nerfing HMs slightly. This operates on the assumption that HML needs only a slight nerf. This is fal...
- by Liang Nuren - at 2012.09.21 16:10:00
|
1791. Sticky:[Winter] Attack Cruisers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Garr Earthbender wrote: Well, I've been thinking about the Omen in the way that I fly the Executioner nowadays. I wonder if it's possible with the new reduction in Beam PG I'll be able to fly a full rack of Heavy Beam II's and nano around at lo...
- by Liang Nuren - at 2012.09.21 16:08:00
|
1792. HEAVY MISSILES NERFED, switch to assault heavy missiles? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Tassian Marrix wrote: So it seems i shouldn't have trained in missiles as my main weapon system. Wonder if I can get the skills refunded. I think it's funny how the missile camp is basically divided between people who can only see the HML ne...
- by Liang Nuren - at 2012.09.21 16:02:00
|
1793. Q: Shield Gank Brutix - why no web? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
ECM drones are the bane of frigates. If you aren't carrying 5 light/med ECM drones on a ship with at least 25m^3 drone bay, you are doing it wrong . -Liang
- by Liang Nuren - at 2012.09.21 15:59:00
|
1794. Sticky:[Winter] Attack Cruisers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Dr Sheng-Ji Yang wrote: Quote: ou're... joking right? That Omen only goes ~1200-1400m/s and has no way to really control range. Furthermore it's not like it's good at close range or fast enough to avoid being at close range with anything tha...
- by Liang Nuren - at 2012.09.20 18:37:00
|
1795. Sticky:[Winter] Attack Cruisers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Dr Sheng-Ji Yang wrote: Quote: Yeah, that's it. The Omen will be a lot more situational than the other attack cruisers. I'll gladly use it, but it won't be as viable in most situations as the other cruisers. At least, that's my take on it. ...
- by Liang Nuren - at 2012.09.20 17:06:00
|
1796. Sticky:[Winter] Disruption Cruisers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Veryez wrote: So why exactly should the beli carry a painter? An unbonused web is still better. The painter is not a 'long range' ew either, with an optimal of 45 and falloff of 90 (max skills, t2), there is almost no reason at all to put one ...
- by Liang Nuren - at 2012.09.20 17:04:00
|
1797. Sticky:[Winter] Attack Cruisers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Dr Sheng-Ji Yang wrote: Quote: Damn, those fits are a little bit sad. I don't think I'd take any of them into combat over a Thorax or Caracal. Even the shield fit is only going to have range advantage for 2-3 seconds against a MWD Thorax an...
- by Liang Nuren - at 2012.09.20 17:01:00
|
1798. Sticky:[Winter] Attack Cruisers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Takeshi Yamato wrote: Some fits for the new Omen: Damn, those fits are a little bit sad. I don't think I'd take any of them into combat over a Thorax or Caracal. Even the shield fit is only going to have range advantage for 2-3 seconds again...
- by Liang Nuren - at 2012.09.20 16:25:00
|
1799. Sticky:[Winter] Attack Cruisers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Gypsio III wrote: Try fewer LSEs and more TDs. Man the Caracal is gonna ******* own: - Good DPS - Great projection - Superior damage application (TE/TC changes) - Solid tank - So Much Ewar! - Fast as **** - Doesn't give a **** about its own ...
- by Liang Nuren - at 2012.09.20 16:15:00
|
1800. Sticky:[Winter] Attack Cruisers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
OT Smithers wrote: Get serious :) Almost no one is using the Caracal today, and for bloody good reason. Now they are talking a 20% damage nerf plus the addition of added damage reduction in the form of TD's. You have a mediocre tank, DPS ha...
- by Liang Nuren - at 2012.09.20 16:09:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 [90] 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |