| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
1. [Proposal] More control over fleet mission rewards - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
It's a way to make fleet missions a little more interesting. òòòòòòò CSM6-Hated by fools for who they are; Loved by the knowledgeable for what they will do.
- by LordElfa - at 2011.06.26 20:35:00
|
2. [Petition] Leave PLEX alone, AUR currency separate from PLEX !!! pls - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Ar'rry Uanid This is pure greediness! Skirt for 1 plex = 34usd. Disgusting. 35 bucks buys 2 PLEX's. that said, the item prices are rediculous indeed but that has nothing to do with this thread. òòòòòòò CSM6-Hated by ...
- by LordElfa - at 2011.06.22 09:45:00
|
3. [Proposal] More control over fleet mission rewards - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Naomi Knight no , pointless change , would just make things worse First off, for those who run missions with others it's not pointless in any way, shape or form. Second, unless you can elaborate on how it would make th...
- by LordElfa - at 2011.06.21 19:59:00
|
4. [Proposal] More control over fleet mission rewards - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
That's a great idea. òòòòòòò CSM6-Hated by fools for who they are; Loved by the knowledgeable for what they will do.
- by LordElfa - at 2011.06.19 21:21:00
|
5. [Proposal] More control over fleet mission rewards - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Bumped for more discussion. òòòòòòò CSM6-Hated by fools for who they are; Loved by the knowledgeable for what they will do.
- by LordElfa - at 2011.06.18 00:16:00
|
6. [Proposal] give an option to disable Jukebox change-ups - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Should be easy to fix then. òòòòòòò CSM6-Hated by fools for who they are; Loved by the knowledgeable for what they will do.
- by LordElfa - at 2011.06.18 00:04:00
|
7. [Proposal] give an option to disable Jukebox change-ups - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Edited by: LordElfa on 14/06/2011 03:33:52 Thanks. I love how many people have read this but not said anything good or bad about it. Like C&P, I'm afraid this particular section of the forum is broken. People only really reply when the threa...
- by LordElfa - at 2011.06.14 03:33:00
|
8. [Petition] Make entry into CQ and Incarna optional and not mandatory. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Agreed. I'm not against Incarna or CQ, but you should be able to dock normal as before and then choose whether or not to leave your capsule and enter CQ. òòòòòòò CSM6-Hated by fools for who they are; Loved by the knowledgeable for what they wil...
- by LordElfa - at 2011.06.14 01:46:00
|
9. [Proposal] More control over fleet mission rewards - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Rented Change something that barely matters from simple to complicated. OR Be the classic EVE D-bag and kick the people you don't like from the fleet for turn in. OR Only run with people you're actually willing ot split ...
- by LordElfa - at 2011.06.14 01:36:00
|
10. [Proposal] give an option to disable Jukebox change-ups - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
As it stands, the jukebox is designed to work best with the Eve playlist. When you proceed through a warp gate, the song changes up to create an appearance of dynamic music. The problem is that it does this with your own playlists as well. How ...
- by LordElfa - at 2011.06.14 01:23:00
|
11. [Proposal] More control over fleet mission rewards - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Edited by: LordElfa on 14/06/2011 01:37:52 *Edited to be more concise and implemented* The way that mission rewards are now split for fleets is underwhelming to say the least. Of the 3 available rewards there are: òisk rewards, òloyalty ...
- by LordElfa - at 2011.06.14 01:14:00
|
12. [Proposal] Advanced skills balancing - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
CCP designed the skill system so that vets would have more versatility over newer players, not more power. While I don't mind the idea, CCP would also say that the purpose of the skills as they are is so to get that extra 2% requires dedication. ...
- by LordElfa - at 2011.06.14 00:49:00
|
13. [Supercarriers] - a point to make. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
From what the OP is saying, I think it isn't the damage or the health of Super Caps that needs to be nerfed, its the remote rep. Just take out the ability for Supers to remote each other. Problem solved. òòòòòòò CSM6-Hated by fools for who ...
- by LordElfa - at 2011.06.14 00:37:00
|
14. Is it time to revisit the Dread ban in Hi sec? - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Edited by: LordElfa on 14/06/2011 00:34:11 I'm not against any kind of sub-super capital in high sec. They aren't capable of spreading more firepower than a fleet of BS's and using them as devices of ganking would be dumb given the cost. Also...
- by LordElfa - at 2011.06.14 00:31:00
|
15. [Proposal] Separate T3 ship appearance from subsystem choices. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Edited by: LordElfa on 11/06/2011 19:04:22 Originally by: Ranka Mei Originally by: LordElfa As it stands, every T3 ship pretty much looks the same already due to there only being a few decent sub combos worth a damn. That was t...
- by LordElfa - at 2011.06.11 19:03:00
|
16. [Proposal] Separate T3 ship appearance from subsystem choices. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Danika Princip Originally by: LordElfa Originally by: Danika Princip Originally by: LordElfa Edited by: LordElfa on 06/06/2011 19:37:04 The only gripe I've ever had with T3 ships is that the appea...
- by LordElfa - at 2011.06.10 18:41:00
|
17. [Proposal] Separate T3 ship appearance from subsystem choices. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Danika Princip Originally by: LordElfa Edited by: LordElfa on 06/06/2011 19:37:04 The only gripe I've ever had with T3 ships is that the appearance of the ship is decided by the subsystem choice. Why not make it...
- by LordElfa - at 2011.06.10 13:52:00
|
18. [Proposal] Sec Status Hit for Offensive War Attacks - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Saxton Hale Don't much care, as long as the sec hit is small (significantly smaller than for lowsec GCC actions) and it doesn't occur in lowsec. I'm pretty sure this would be a High Sec war action only hit. If not, that'...
- by LordElfa - at 2011.06.09 18:35:00
|
19. RL $$$ Alter our game.. Coming Soon! - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Vandrion Look at the thread in this forum where almost 80% of the responders don't want MT at all. 80% of the responders in that threadnaught make up about 0.02% of all EVE residents, don't pretend that it's the majorit...
- by LordElfa - at 2011.06.09 18:32:00
|
20. [Proposal] Sec Status Hit for Offensive War Attacks - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Edited by: LordElfa on 09/06/2011 18:25:06 Supported. Raising the cost of War Dec's is a pointless endeavor as where this idea would be a step towards making War Dec's what they should have been from the beginning, a means by which to settle g...
- by LordElfa - at 2011.06.09 18:24:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |