| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [20] 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
381. Three New Team Play Anti-Gank Modules - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
admiral root wrote: So gank our destroyers instead of doing a poor job of trying to insult people on the forum. While you're here, can you point me towards the guy who gives away all these free Catalysts please?
- by Mag's - at 2015.07.04 00:10:02
|
382. NPE feedback Q and A - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
K24Q wrote: However the system also has I think quite damaging negatives especially for low SP players: SP are non refundable, once they are spent they are spent.
The rate of SP generation is arbitrarily tied to the skill currently in tr...
- by Mag's - at 2015.07.03 23:51:56
|
383. Three New Team Play Anti-Gank Modules - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Ferrosan wrote: Your "content" shouldn't shut down portions of my game. It should be content for me as well. I should be able to rise to the occasion, be part of the content, bring a bunch of friends, and try to get my shipment through. So do...
- by Mag's - at 2015.07.03 23:25:17
|
384. Replace Attributes with Activity-Affected Personal Indices - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Lim Hiaret wrote: Mag's wrote: I will always say no , to grind based SP acquirement. It was in the game early on, it was removed and for good reason. Could you please reiterate this reason. Most people where not around at that time. I...
- by Mag's - at 2015.06.26 18:47:32
|
385. Replace Attributes with Activity-Affected Personal Indices - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I will always say no , to grind based SP acquirement. It was in the game early on and it was removed and for good reason.
- by Mag's - at 2015.06.26 13:10:31
|
386. A Fair and Balanced Counter to Freighter Bumping - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
CCP's official response regarding bumping. Oh and the web works just fine thanks. Reported for redundancy. Edit: I see you made bumper bingo, by mentioning the recycling alts myth. Congrats.
- by Mag's - at 2015.06.20 23:48:52
|
387. Drone aggression swaps in pvp situations. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Kirra Tarren wrote: I'd rather have an official CCP response on this than the circlejerking trolls and meaningless conflict that is happening now. What we have now is 12 pages of people using the same arguments on eachother. Why do you CCP to ...
- by Mag's - at 2015.06.20 07:21:54
|
388. Sticky:AFK CloakingGäó: Ideas, Discussion, and Proposals - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I see we are still repeating already discussed ideas and opinions. So nothing new there then. Carry on.
- by Mag's - at 2015.06.19 01:03:03
|
389. Long-Term EVE Online Revision Plan Addressing Player Concerns - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Constantin Baracca wrote: Mag's wrote: Constantin Baracca wrote: Mag's wrote: Quote: 'This also means that Worm Hole residents in [sandbox space] might suddenly see a wormhole open up into [theme park space], a place their enemies m...
- by Mag's - at 2015.06.17 15:24:13
|
390. Long-Term EVE Online Revision Plan Addressing Player Concerns - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Constantin Baracca wrote: Mag's wrote: Quote: 'This also means that Worm Hole residents in [sandbox space] might suddenly see a wormhole open up into [theme park space], a place their enemies might be able to essentially stage an assault ...
- by Mag's - at 2015.06.17 15:08:22
|
391. Long-Term EVE Online Revision Plan Addressing Player Concerns - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Constantin Baracca wrote: Mag's wrote: Constantin Baracca wrote: The proposal does not ask for a PVE server. Except when you ask for a themepark PvE server? Cool. Since you may have missed it, the proposal. I don't click external...
- by Mag's - at 2015.06.17 13:36:04
|
392. Long-Term EVE Online Revision Plan Addressing Player Concerns - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Constantin Baracca wrote: Mag's wrote: No. I love it when people ask for this wonderland PvE server, completely ignoring the fact that PvP isn't limited to combat. Eve is a single shard PvP centric game. Don't like it? Go play another game ...
- by Mag's - at 2015.06.17 13:27:55
|
393. @ Ccp, Please Revise the skill List - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
There is a word, it's called 'specialization'. So I say no to what you ask for. However. I do see that the current attribute system tends to punish players that 'Specialize', so wouldn't be averse to their removal and flat rate for all (2700 mayb...
- by Mag's - at 2015.06.17 13:24:03
|
394. Long-Term EVE Online Revision Plan Addressing Player Concerns - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
No. I love it when people ask for this wonderland PvE server, completely ignoring the fact that PvP isn't limited to combat. Eve is a single shard PvP centric game. Don't like it? Go play another game that is boring as hell, that doesn't include ...
- by Mag's - at 2015.06.17 13:16:39
|
395. The Police - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
James Baboli wrote: All police skins should also go woop woop. because it's the sound of the space police. This. We need woop woop.
- by Mag's - at 2015.06.12 19:21:50
|
396. Space mines - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Cheburko wrote: This game will die if it remains under the direct influence of bittervets. While the forum dies under the weight of ignorant posters, with little thought going into their posts and ideas. Amidoingitright?
- by Mag's - at 2015.06.12 01:11:25
|
397. Negative Standings against Empires, Lock outs and more - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Zan Shiro wrote: Mag's wrote: DaOpa wrote: Black Pedro wrote: DaOpa wrote: NPC Stations should not be harboring criminals. Why not? CCP spent much effort coding Crimewatch and balancing the game so criminals are able to operate i...
- by Mag's - at 2015.06.11 02:25:42
|
398. IDEA: Sounding Charges - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Reported for redundancy.
- by Mag's - at 2015.06.11 01:07:56
|
399. Negative Standings against Empires, Lock outs and more - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
DaOpa wrote: Black Pedro wrote: DaOpa wrote: NPC Stations should not be harboring criminals. Why not? CCP spent much effort coding Crimewatch and balancing the game so criminals are able to operate in highsec while still providing some...
- by Mag's - at 2015.06.11 01:03:33
|
400. Barges need a buff - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Sorry guys, this has to be a troll. Surely no one that long in the game, can be so ignorant.
- by Mag's - at 2015.06.02 15:53:23
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [20] 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |