Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 [80] 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 |
1581. A message everyone in HED-GP can come together about - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote: Malcanis wrote: Dinsdale Pirannha wrote: How does an increase in null sec industrial capabilities force local fights? I completely agree that many many localized fights are what a war is supposed to be about. Bu...
- by Malcanis - at 2014.01.19 17:02:00
|
1582. A message everyone in HED-GP can come together about - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Katrina Oniseki wrote: Malcanis wrote: To achieve this, CCP will have to truly radically reduce capital and supercapital movement. I'm talking about changes on the order of a 24 hour cooldown on capital jumps, requiring consumables for g...
- by Malcanis - at 2014.01.19 17:00:00
|
1583. A message everyone in HED-GP can come together about - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote: How does an increase in null sec industrial capabilities force local fights? I completely agree that many many localized fights are what a war is supposed to be about. But if you buff null sec industry, that will just...
- by Malcanis - at 2014.01.19 16:48:00
|
1584. A message everyone in HED-GP can come together about - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Marlona Sky wrote: Nice to see you guys are finally realizing that power projection is a problem. Hey I predicted this exact outcome 3 years ago, before the non-DOT NC was destroyed. Not that it was exactly difficult Malcanis said in 2...
- by Malcanis - at 2014.01.19 16:17:00
|
1585. A message everyone in HED-GP can come together about - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Kaminokage wrote: Malcanis wrote: The solution to this is something that not many of you are going to like the sound of. First off, it's important to understand that's there's no magic "shut up and take my money" hardware bullet. Even if CC...
- by Malcanis - at 2014.01.19 16:13:00
|
1586. A message everyone in HED-GP can come together about - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Infinity Ziona wrote: There is no real need for getting rid of jump drives or bridges. The need is to get a % of the opposing forces out of the main system and into other systems to spread the load. The TIDI was not terrible yesterday at 1.5k. ...
- by Malcanis - at 2014.01.19 16:10:00
|
1587. A message everyone in HED-GP can come together about - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Bizzaro Stormy MurphDog wrote: Malcanis wrote: The solution to this is something that not many of you are going to like the sound of. First off, it's important to understand that's there's no magic "shut up and take my money" hardware bulle...
- by Malcanis - at 2014.01.19 16:04:00
|
1588. A message everyone in HED-GP can come together about - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The solution to this is something that not many of you are going to like the sound of. First off, it's important to understand that's there's no magic "shut up and take my money" hardware bullet. Even if CCP went out and bought literally the best...
- by Malcanis - at 2014.01.19 12:58:00
|
1589. Why CSM? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Pinky Hops wrote: I can't identify any specific area where the CSM existing was singularly beneficial Can you give an example of what you would consider "singularly beneficial"?
- by Malcanis - at 2014.01.17 20:36:00
|
1590. Why CSM? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
And Mike azariah? And Ali Aras? Which big bloc elected Ripard? Come on, man. This is just lazy of you. You're being taken in by a trite cliche.
- by Malcanis - at 2014.01.17 05:33:00
|
1591. Why CSM? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Michael Mach wrote: Midnight Firestarter wrote: The CSM in its current format is a crock of **** 70% of the people elected simply send out a Alliance mail and they vote. Its has nothing to do with policies and what 's good they can bring to...
- by Malcanis - at 2014.01.16 21:02:00
|
1592. Nerf Nullsec Income by 10% - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
PotatoOverdose wrote: You know what the best way to prove your point is? Actually moving to hisec. If CCP sees truly large numbers moving out of null into hisec , they'll take action. They'll judge you on what you do, not what you say. Until ...
- by Malcanis - at 2014.01.15 20:02:00
|
1593. Why CSM? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ishtanchuk Fazmarai wrote: The few and chosen are only good when they pay 15,000 bucks for the privilege... but that would be one weird business model. xn.ym Malcanis wrote: Yet without people like these, EVE would be sterile an...
- by Malcanis - at 2014.01.12 22:48:00
|
1594. Why CSM? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ishtanchuk Fazmarai wrote: Also, you point an interesting issue: should CCP care about the "wrong" players? What if they were the "right" payers? The logical consequence of my analysis is tat CCP should categorise the players as follows: ...
- by Malcanis - at 2014.01.12 22:43:00
|
1595. Why CSM? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ishtanchuk Fazmarai wrote: Anyone at the CSM still haves a x-bucks-a-year account? I have 2 accounts. 1 (this one) is paid for by CCP whilse I am on the CSM. The other is paid at UK rates on a 6 monthly sub. (-ú49.99/half year IIRC) I hav...
- by Malcanis - at 2014.01.12 22:36:00
|
1596. Why CSM? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Mike Azariah wrote: Hard to believe but some of us advocate things that are better for the game rather than just for ourselves. Since April, I personally have seen a grand total of 2 incidents of CSM communication that happened to strike me...
- by Malcanis - at 2014.01.12 21:48:00
|
1597. What would happen if CCP finally nerfed hisec? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: Pinky Hops wrote: you know what would really happen if CCP nerfed highsec? a threadnaught of epic proportions. this monstrosity of a thread is already up to page 26 -- and it's only just asking about the POSSIBILITY. edit: ...
- by Malcanis - at 2014.01.12 20:24:00
|
1598. Why CSM? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I personally always advocate things that benefit me. I'm an EVE player.
- by Malcanis - at 2014.01.12 20:18:00
|
1599. Why CSM? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Pinky Hops wrote: Malcanis wrote: The thing is that you just say that to sound edgy and cynical. No man. You made the assertion that I was saying it to be "edgy" which puts the burden of proof on you. It also makes you look like a child ...
- by Malcanis - at 2014.01.12 19:03:00
|
1600. How to explain eve to a non-player. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ishtanchuk Fazmarai wrote: My advice would be: "If you want to have fun with EVE Online, just read about it. It's cheaper and funnier than the actual game." Quite so , although i'm surprised to hear you agree, because that has a very radica...
- by Malcanis - at 2014.01.12 11:42:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 [80] 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |