Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [20] 30 40 50 60 70 |
381. [Proposal] Voting Software for CSM Elections. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Lord Zim wrote: I, too, claim the AUR protests were what caused CCP to change their minds. I think it's reasonable to say that they were a contributory factor. The playerbase unsubs, the protests, the CSM, and the threadnaughts all played a ...
- by Malcanis - at 2012.01.06 20:05:00
|
382. [Proposal] Voting Software for CSM Elections. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Tiger's Spirit wrote: Revolution Rising wrote: 70% of the players are empire dwellers, but the CSM is obviously run by 0.0 alliance heads. ... Solution : 33.333% of CSM members from 0.0 sec mains 33.333% of CSM members from low sec al...
- by Malcanis - at 2012.01.06 16:51:00
|
383. [Proposal] Voting Software for CSM Elections. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Revolution Rising wrote: CSM Vote time comes around, when you login, vote screen comes up, you MUST vote. May or may not include a donkey vote - haven't thought about that much yet. I'm interested to hear what people think. This way everyone g...
- by Malcanis - at 2012.01.05 07:03:00
|
384. [Proposal] Voting Software for CSM Elections. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Trebor Daehdoow wrote: I am all for this, but only if *I* get to write the software. "It's not who gets the votes that counts; it's who counts the votes" - Stalin Side note: Stalin introduced mandatory voting too!
- by Malcanis - at 2012.01.05 07:02:00
|
385. [Proposal] Voting Software for CSM Elections. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Revolution Rising wrote: Scatim Helicon wrote: Mandatory voting on something that 80% of the playerbase doesn't know anything about just leads to people clicking for whoever happens to be the first name they see on the voting screen. So eit...
- by Malcanis - at 2012.01.05 07:00:00
|
386. NO DISLIKE BUTTON - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Because this is a forum for EVE players, and there are no limits to how many reps you can give. Conclusion: I reckon it would take between 2 and 8 hours for the negrep wars to plateau at peak intensity and stay there forever.
- by Malcanis - at 2012.01.01 19:32:00
|
387. [Proposal] - Allow Warfare Links To Be Used By One Account Solo Players - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Terranid Meester wrote: Malcanis wrote: Terranid Meester wrote: Velicitia wrote: they're "Gang Links" for a reason. They are gang links yet a single player with two accounts can use them. They are gang assist modules yet do they N...
- by Malcanis - at 2011.12.31 18:26:00
|
388. [Proposal] - Allow Warfare Links To Be Used By One Account Solo Players - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Terranid Meester wrote: Velicitia wrote: they're "Gang Links" for a reason. They are gang links yet a single player with two accounts can use them. They are gang assist modules yet do they NEED to only be used by by mutliple accounts? ...
- by Malcanis - at 2011.12.31 17:30:00
|
389. [Proposal] Mild nerf to T3 Strategic Cruisers - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Agreed that CS should get the +5% for warfare links while T3s should only get +3%. T3 boosters get plenty of other compensating advantages.
- by Malcanis - at 2011.12.28 16:19:00
|
390. [Proposal] Stop putting forward proposals that are stupid as hell and impossible... - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Stahlregen wrote: This forum is absolutely hilarious when it comes to clueless publords championing their own exclusively personal gripes and issues with the game that affect precisely zero players except themselves. Instead of clogging this fo...
- by Malcanis - at 2011.12.28 14:34:00
|
391. [Proposal] Stop putting forward proposals that are stupid as hell and impossible... - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Aineko Macx wrote: Was going to support until I read Stahlregen wrote: You have been given the most successful and energetic CSM to date to carry your ideas to CCP. Stahlregen's argument is only supported by the facts, and as Homer Sim...
- by Malcanis - at 2011.12.28 14:30:00
|
392. [Proposal] Mild nerf to T3 Strategic Cruisers - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Mara Rinn wrote: Malcanis wrote: Trying to balance ships around the brain-dead NPCs we have instead of trying to balance the NPCs against the way ships actually work in PvP is the fundamental error here. So the fact that the Tengu receive...
- by Malcanis - at 2011.12.28 14:28:00
|
393. [Proposal] Mild nerf to T3 Strategic Cruisers - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Who gives a **** about "PvE balance"? That's like saying that cruise missiles are overpowered because CNRs are the most common faction BS in mission hubs. That's not a comment on how balanced the ships are, it's a comment on how bad EVE's PvE is. ...
- by Malcanis - at 2011.12.27 22:01:00
|
394. [Proposal] Make T2 original blueprints available to everyone - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Pink Marshmellow wrote: What bothers me more is that its called "INVENTION", You can't invent something that ALREADY HAS BEEN CONCEIVED AND MADE! Change the term invention to some other term. IT IS NOT INVENTION! Reverse Enginerring?
- by Malcanis - at 2011.12.27 21:56:00
|
395. Bounty hunting - let's get this sorted - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Adoniah Carrefour wrote: Malcanis wrote: Solo Player wrote: Trebor Daehdoow wrote: A similar idea was proposed a few weeks ago. Working up a proposal is on my to-do list. That one. Which I think is more elegant in its simplicity,...
- by Malcanis - at 2011.12.16 00:04:00
|
396. Bounty hunting - let's get this sorted - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote: I don't like the idea of limiting bounties to kills, because there are more reasons for bounties than violence. Corp thieves, scammers, et cetera could all draw substantial bounties without firing a shot. Agreed ...
- by Malcanis - at 2011.12.15 21:18:00
|
397. Bounty hunting - let's get this sorted - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Wolodymyr wrote: Malcanis wrote: So imagine that you put a 500M bounty on Malcanis, whom I'm sure we all agree richly deserves it. Under the current system, I will simply jump to an empty clone and pod himself with an alt, collecting your 50...
- by Malcanis - at 2011.12.15 20:22:00
|
398. [CSM] December Summit - The Economy in General - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Goose99 wrote: Xorv wrote: No Goose99, everything you say in your last post has been answered in one of previous posts, Except about players leaving. I think what it boils down to is you just want EVE to be more of a Themepark style MMO. I...
- by Malcanis - at 2011.12.12 07:43:00
|
399. [CSM] December Summit - The PLEX in Particular - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Max Kolonko wrote: PLEX PROBLEM = PRICE PLEX is the safeguard to RMT, but RMT is nothing more than botting If CCP Focuses on removing botting, than those few leftover RMT'ers will have no impact on CCP balance score Botting is a seperate ...
- by Malcanis - at 2011.12.04 11:28:00
|
400. [CSM] December Summit - Future of the CSM - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Cearain wrote: The Mittani wrote: This thread is a good collection of tinfoil. .. I suspect CSM7 will see vastly increased turnout, because despite a tiny vocal minority of the blind and deluded, most players now realize how much power and...
- by Malcanis - at 2011.12.04 11:26:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [20] 30 40 50 60 70 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |