Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 [40] 50 60 70 80 |
781. Trebor Daehdoow for CSM8 - The Proven Performer - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Trebor Daehdoow wrote: 2) None of the other active CSMs decided to run again, and continuity between CSM7 and CSM8 will be important, particularly in light of (1). I'd just like to re-emphasise this. Even if you don't particularly agree w...
- by Malcanis - at 2013.02.21 21:54:00
|
782. Unforgiven Storm for CSM 8 - Experience and Knowledge - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Unforgiven Storm wrote: IGÇÖm debuting a new column in my blog called GÇ£This Will Never HappenGÇ¥ that will be published every Wednesdays. Check it out: http://thelazypilot.wordpress.com/2013/02/20/this-will-never-happen/ I read that. I ...
- by Malcanis - at 2013.02.21 18:14:00
|
783. Malcanis for CSM 8 (no troll this time) - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
CCP have announced their new voting system. Suffice it to say that I don't think it will deliver the results that they claim they want, which is not a big surprise given the problem was misidentified in the first place. The correct solution was an...
- by Malcanis - at 2013.02.21 17:41:00
|
784. Trebor Daehdoow for CSM8 - The Proven Performer - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Wescro wrote: Candidates like Malcanis and James 315 have put forward some grand designs or concepts they'd like to see. Even if the CSM has so far been unable to enact real change, we know what their vision of EVE is. From your OP I can te...
- by Malcanis - at 2013.02.21 14:58:00
|
785. Trebor Daehdoow for CSM8 - The Proven Performer - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Trebor Daehdoow wrote: Just a quick note that the Election devblog has been published. Lots of interesting changes, enjoy! Ahahahah, well all hail the CFC & HBC approved CSM. I don't want to hear any complaints that they didn't warn ...
- by Malcanis - at 2013.02.21 14:31:00
|
786. Sticky:The voting reform discussion - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Poetic Stanziel wrote: rodyas wrote: Poetic Stanziel wrote: rodyas wrote: I do understand they could wreck the elections ... Who said anything about wrecking the election? Ah I reread your blog and I think I see what you mean. You ...
- by Malcanis - at 2013.02.21 10:25:00
|
787. [CSM8] Ripard Teg for CSM8 - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Ripard Teg wrote: Sorry for the lack of replies today. I will reply to everything tomorrow. But we did chicken fleet tonight and it was amazing and I didn't want to miss it. http://www.rotekapelle.com/killboard/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=8...
- by Malcanis - at 2013.02.21 08:25:00
|
788. Marc Scaurus for CSM 8 - Lowsec Representative - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Marc, I would like to hear your opinion on a couple of concepts: (1) At the moment, hi-sec does not offer the opportunity for hi-sec players to experience large scale fights and extended fights. Do you think FW is the correct platform to extend t...
- by Malcanis - at 2013.02.20 14:29:00
|
789. Trebor Daehdoow for CSM8 - The Proven Performer - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Trebor has proved his commitment and value to the CSM beyond all doubt. I'm running myself this year, but I also very much want Trebor to get a seat because we will need him on CSM8 for his insitutional knowledge and experience. Give Trebor (some ...
- by Malcanis - at 2013.02.20 10:44:00
|
790. Malcanis for CSM 8 (no troll this time) - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Josef Djugashvilis wrote: One often hears that there is no reason to leave the hi-sec 'bubble' as it has missions, wardecs, decent asteroids to mine, good manufacturing facilities etc. Might it not be the case that if null-sec were to get dece...
- by Malcanis - at 2013.02.19 21:24:00
|
791. Malcanis for CSM 8 (no troll this time) - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Lord Zim wrote: Amyclas Amatin wrote: [quote=Amyclas Amatin]I respect your position, and I sincerely hope to see more null-sec buffs and features. But I can't agree with doing it at the expense of high-sec. So given the fact that I can f...
- by Malcanis - at 2013.02.19 18:00:00
|
792. Malcanis for CSM 8 (no troll this time) - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
In any case I am perfectly fine with hi-sec having plenty of production slots so long as CCP make production in 0.0 more efficient to compensate for the subsidies that hi-sec gets.
- by Malcanis - at 2013.02.19 17:51:00
|
793. Malcanis for CSM 8 (no troll this time) - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Amyclas Amatin wrote: I still disagree with nerfing high-sec production to create demand for null-sec production. As it is, the main reason for null production is a logistics base closer to home for the null alliances. There's no need to forc...
- by Malcanis - at 2013.02.19 14:48:00
|
794. [CSM8] Ripard Teg for CSM8 - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Ripard Teg wrote: Aside from this, I may have to bide my time on this particular issue. Because unfortunately, there are bigger issues facing the game: sovereignty, drawing in new players, and POSes, for three. But yes, super proliferation ...
- by Malcanis - at 2013.02.19 14:40:00
|
795. Malcanis for CSM 8 (no troll this time) - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Sable Moran wrote: Malcanis wrote: hi-sec production [... snip ...] use of the production lines is so cheap it might as well be free What do you think of extending the office rent mechanism to manufacturing/research slot cost? I.e. if all...
- by Malcanis - at 2013.02.19 14:22:00
|
796. Malcanis for CSM 8 (no troll this time) - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Amyclas Amatin wrote: Mallak Azaria wrote: Amyclas Amatin wrote: Maybe your stations need a buff. Nerfing high-sec will result in a lot of screaming. Nullsec stations do need a buff but highsec stations also need a huge nerf, otherwise...
- by Malcanis - at 2013.02.19 09:33:00
|
797. Sticky:CSM December minutes: The EVE Economy - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Look, just accept that it's a bad idea, and that it's not going to happen. CCP should never ever obselete player professions with NPC services.
- by Malcanis - at 2013.02.18 17:11:00
|
798. Malcanis for CSM 8 (no troll this time) - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Amyclas Amatin wrote: Just my opinion: 1. Leave the carebears alone! They are cute and cuddly... most are also ransomable. (Not that I would ransom them... honest. ) Correct me if I'm wrong: You seem to believe that a lucrative high-sec hurt...
- by Malcanis - at 2013.02.18 11:59:00
|
799. Malcanis for CSM 8 (no troll this time) - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Mallak Azaria wrote: Dinsdale Pirannha wrote: I simply don't believe we need more null sec mouthpieces who espouse "balancing the game" at the expense of high sec. If we went with representation by demographics, fully half of the CSM would b...
- by Malcanis - at 2013.02.17 21:43:00
|
800. Sticky:CSM December minutes: The CSM - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
rodyas wrote: Also a quick question over the CCP vs CSM favoritism that seen to come up over the EVE-Uni botting scandal. Do you think its fair, that Sreegs punished one member of the CSM so harshly What member of the CSM did Sreegs punish?
- by Malcanis - at 2013.02.17 20:43:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 [40] 50 60 70 80 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |