| Pages: [1] 2 |
1. POS vs Citadel for solo player - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Dimkin wrote: So the question is, do I miss something? Aside of that is it convenient to dock to a citadel and maybe a couple of additional advantages, should I even consider moving? You are missing that ECs are meant to replace POSes and not...
- by March rabbit - at 2016.12.09 13:34:10
|
2. Engineering Complexes a bit worse than a large POS? - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Shayla Etherodyne wrote: As we are speaking of renting space in citadels high sec owned by other entities, I have a few questions for you: I'm not the target for these questions but i can give some answers: ===== - Why I should defend the ...
- by March rabbit - at 2016.10.24 15:38:40
|
3. Recent Increase in Highsec Ganks - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Paranoid Loyd wrote: Whiskey Haze wrote: your hostility is baffling. Quitting the game instead of figuring out how to play it properly baffles me. Can you provide link to CCP approved set of rules to play Eve Online? I fear after playi...
- by March rabbit - at 2015.04.10 15:08:49
|
4. State of T2 Production? - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Selaria Unbertable wrote: ... And traveling around with BPCs and datacores, despite their volume reduction, is a pita, you have to get back to fetch the invented bpcs and bring them to your production facility... not only pita but RISK. Th...
- by March rabbit - at 2015.03.04 11:35:31
|
5. Prospect Building Requirements - EveManufacturing.co.uk blog - in Science and Industry [original thread]
good read, thanks. I didn't get one thing: Quote: ... The material requirements listed are at material efficiency (ME) 0 which is 10% waste so to find the material requirements for a ME -4 we simply divide the material requirements by 11 and ...
- by March rabbit - at 2014.05.27 21:08:00
|
6. Null sec industry changes - has anyone told the alliances? - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Paul Otichoda wrote: Tarikla wrote: Malcanis said it perfectly. Industry dosen't even require a second account, you just throw some plex(es) at dual char training (depending on what you want to do in industry) and you're set. Industry is al...
- by March rabbit - at 2014.04.24 22:12:00
|
7. Offline High-Sec POSes - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Loraine Gess wrote: "We don't want to destroy anyone's assets ...but we wouldn't mind if they just lost those assets" Carebear logic personally i care a little when i lose ship to NPC but i care A LOT if i lose my ship to other player....
- by March rabbit - at 2014.02.17 14:07:00
|
8. Pos's not used - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Elena Thiesant wrote: Victoria Sin wrote: There are only so many people you can throw at a software project without diminishing returns in terms of end product. This. Doubling the developers on a feature does not necessarily mean it'll g...
- by March rabbit - at 2013.08.24 13:09:00
|
9. Ice - Sell Raw or Refine? - in Science and Industry [original thread]
cannot comment on profits but would mention one thing: to have good refining rate you need to reduce faction/corp taxes which needs you to have enough standings with station owners. Simple training of skill is not enough
- by March rabbit - at 2013.08.05 12:56:00
|
10. Regarding T2 Ship Inventing..... - in Science and Industry [original thread]
afaik they don't. ME/PE is controlled by decryptors
- by March rabbit - at 2013.07.08 16:47:00
|
11. So high sec miners, expect to get screwed more - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Chic Botany wrote: If they tweak refining rates then things will happen. The forums will light up with whiners Some people will ragequit (good riddance, they're obviously not here for the long term if they can't accept change) Some people wil...
- by March rabbit - at 2013.07.08 14:19:00
|
12. Mining after Odyssey - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Chribba wrote: Huttan Funaila wrote: Bugsy VanHalen wrote: YES, Mining in dreads, now all we need is a capital mining laser. Shhh! You'll give Chribba too much excitement with that idea. Been a long wait coming! you hadn't wait fo...
- by March rabbit - at 2013.05.30 15:06:00
|
13. CCPs Miners are "Clay Pidgeons" mentality - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Haulie Berry wrote: Quote: characters, accounts, people. who the frak cares. Er... anyone who is interested in facts? I have two accounts. Four of my characters never leave high sec. 3 of them haven't even undocked in months. They do thi...
- by March rabbit - at 2013.05.15 13:03:00
|
14. Will hisec mining lose all its viability? Will changes draw any miners to nullsec? - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Danni stark wrote: but i thought null sec was a super safe blue pie or something? it is. it is safe for big alliances and blue nap coalitions. but it is not safe for regular pilots. what do you care more about?
- by March rabbit - at 2013.05.07 17:05:00
|
15. CCPGÇÖs latest strong arm attempt to populate null and low sec - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Dave Stark wrote: Oliver G wrote: All the people who want to be there are already there. incorrect. i want to be in null, however i make more isk in high sec so i am there. there's no incentive for me to go in to null, currently. if yo...
- by March rabbit - at 2013.04.30 14:14:00
|
16. CSM minutes: industry in 0.0 - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Bugsy VanHalen wrote: We need the equivalence of a gold rush in EVE to encourage players to get out there. Once there they will see it is not so bad and stay, even after the gold rush is over. Have you heard about Drone Regions? Like 1-2 y...
- by March rabbit - at 2013.01.25 15:26:00
|
17. CSM minutes: industry in 0.0 - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Dave Stark wrote: Zetaomega333 wrote: If they had a rock thats just like ice where you could mine from dt to dt just to collect the trit you bet your ass there would be mining ops to mine it. i'd like to say this is complete ****. but, ac...
- by March rabbit - at 2013.01.23 14:13:00
|
18. CSM minutes: industry in 0.0 - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Rengerel en Distel wrote: They said they would mine the high ends, transport it to high, and buy trit, and bring it back, as they already do. They also said they would like to have more low ends in what they already mine, which would actually ...
- by March rabbit - at 2013.01.22 13:29:00
|
19. CSM minutes: industry in 0.0 - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Dave Stark wrote: March rabbit wrote: They want to supply high-sec with minerals and kill all empire miner competition might want to read what you quoted before making ******** comments like that. QFT. try better next time
- by March rabbit - at 2013.01.22 12:37:00
|
20. CSM minutes: industry in 0.0 - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Quote: Greyscale asked the CSM if giving, say, infinite assembly lines at no cost would be sufficient to bolster null-sec industry. Elise did not agree, and Trebor sarcastically replied that it was GÇ£a good startGÇ¥. Greyscale wondered wher...
- by March rabbit - at 2013.01.22 11:10:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |