Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 20 |
121. Sticky:[Winter] Missile Rebalance + Hurricane tweak - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Michael Harari wrote: Also making TDs affect missiles is goddamn ********. Now there is literally NO situation in which you dont want TDs fitted and there is NO counter to someone using TDs (apart from blobbing them....see a theme?) TCs, TEs...
- by MisterNick - at 2012.09.18 15:41:00
|
122. Sticky:[Winter] Missile Rebalance + Hurricane tweak - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Real men HAM Drake anyway
- by MisterNick - at 2012.09.18 15:30:00
|
123. Sticky:[Winter] Attack Cruisers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Yun Kuai wrote: Eternal Error wrote: No love for medium rails? Agreed, those things are still hard to fit, cap intensive, and terribad tracking :( And laugh if you even mention the word Damage
- by MisterNick - at 2012.09.18 15:18:00
|
124. Sticky:[Winter] Missile Rebalance + Hurricane tweak - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
NiGhTTraX wrote: No other battlecruiser requires implants or gun downgrading to fulfill its intended purpose. These decisions seem terrible imho. Not flown a Brutix recently then, I take it.
- by MisterNick - at 2012.09.18 14:15:00
|
125. Sticky:[Winter] Missile Rebalance + Hurricane tweak - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I can hear the tears from FOTM pilots across the cluster
- by MisterNick - at 2012.09.18 14:13:00
|
126. Sticky:[Winter] Attack Cruisers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Pinky Denmark wrote: Expect the Vexor to receive a Repair bonus in line with Incursus and Myrmidon... I'd be ok with that (if it was 10% like the incursus), but it'd mean losing one of the two solid bonuses it already has
- by MisterNick - at 2012.09.18 14:04:00
|
127. Sticky:[Winter] Attack Cruisers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Woops, forgot the Caracal. Agreed that it doesn't really need that huge range, i'd sawp the velocity for explosion velocity, to better hit the new faster everything.
- by MisterNick - at 2012.09.18 13:03:00
|
128. Sticky:[Winter] Attack Cruisers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
6 lows on the Omen? That thing us going to hurt The thorax's tracking bonus is a nice idea but the base speed buff might need a little extra to make up for the lose mwd bonus. it's not like it has a choice regarding getting all up in your fac...
- by MisterNick - at 2012.09.18 12:52:00
|
129. Low/Null sec Ratting with a SB - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Dressy wrote: Over recent days, I have been ratting in syndicate in my Nemesis. The biggest trouble is the frigs and destroyers, though once they mwd there're toast. I haven't been using the MSE though... My torp and covops skills are only jus...
- by MisterNick - at 2012.09.18 12:41:00
|
130. Second Minmatar Destroyer - Unofficial Render - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
It doesn't look quite as ace as the caldari one, but still, me likey
- by MisterNick - at 2012.09.17 16:21:00
|
131. Winter Rebalance : Gallente Navy Exequror - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The NExeq is good, and would be a gret kiter if medium rails weren't so hilarious
- by MisterNick - at 2012.09.17 11:41:00
|
132. Eve website borked? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I don't know if it's just me, but the eve universe tab (the one where you can swap between the main page, eve gate, community area etc) has vanished. Not a massive deal, it seems the pages themselves are still there you just have to go via Google.
- by MisterNick - at 2012.09.16 12:13:00
|
133. The old Turnets back - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
How could anyone not like the new nebulae? They look fantastic
- by MisterNick - at 2012.09.15 17:31:00
|
134. Sticky:[Winter] Disruption Cruisers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Bellicose should be a good laugh with these changes. About time too, I don't think i've ever seen one flown.
- by MisterNick - at 2012.09.14 11:34:00
|
135. Ship rebalancing is pointless and a waste of time. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Thee already done round of frigate balancing has been excellent, imo
- by MisterNick - at 2012.09.13 19:49:00
|
136. How about a little drone love? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Mr Beardsley wrote: How about NOT totally reloading my drone display every time I launch drones? Their hard enough to manage without having to rejigger my view of the various groups so I can see if their taking damage, etc. That does get an...
- by MisterNick - at 2012.09.13 13:45:00
|
137. [Winter] Support Cruisers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Winter's shaping up to be fun
- by MisterNick - at 2012.09.13 13:38:00
|
138. Do Single Account Cap Pilots Exist? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
If you have the carrier as a much-used corporate asset it's reasonable to ask people to cyno you around, I think.
- by MisterNick - at 2012.09.13 13:19:00
|
139. 800mm Tornado sitting in a plex ... - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Barrak wrote: A sensor dampner script will knock off roughly halve locking range and than at that point, it will be about a fast enough ships, with a small enough sig, to be able to close the distance whilst maintain transversal. Once you with...
- by MisterNick - at 2012.09.09 08:17:00
|
140. About Ganking - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Been ganked once in 2 years, that was in a pre-buff retriever in which I was afk mining. It cost next to nothing and the tank was enough for rats and that's it, I couldn't exactly complain. I don't know just how the buff to barges has effected ga...
- by MisterNick - at 2012.09.09 08:11:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 20 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |