Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 |
1. Do we want the new graphics upgrade? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Meh, I am somewhere between neutral and against. Personally I would still be in favor of a alternate low powered graphics mode like icons or even wireframe. Maybe I am odd but I spend most of my time zoomed out to where most things are just icons...
- by Nekopyat - at 2012.03.26 16:39:00
|
2. Does CSM have a 'carebear' representative? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Nephilius wrote: As far as CSM is concerned, there absolutely needs to be reps from all three areas of Eve. Three from each, each with an equal voice. No CSM chair, each one focuses on what will make the game better for their constiuents. And ...
- by Nekopyat - at 2012.01.24 02:27:00
|
3. EVE could be shooting itself in the foot - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Serpents smile But what's the point? It is a game? Quote: Since this is thus far a space(pixel)ship game to blow up other spacepixelships, whats the point? blowing up spaceships is only a part of EVE. It is ...
- by Nekopyat - at 2010.02.23 00:11:00
|
4. Crysis - Full size EVE Online amarr battleship, dread and titan - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Nekopyat on 19/02/2010 07:13:51 Originally by: Xtover You won't be walking in ships, you'll be walking in stations. Also, it makes sense also even if it were the case. Try walking around a sub. Stations suffer from the ...
- by Nekopyat - at 2010.02.19 07:09:00
|
5. Crysis - Full size EVE Online amarr battleship, dread and titan - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Jagga Spikes it just shows people have no sense of scale. which probably includes some CCP, as well. Heh. I think it STARTS with CCP staff. Well, I can not fully blame CCP alone here. Making ships pointlessly huge has be...
- by Nekopyat - at 2010.02.18 15:23:00
|
6. EVE Online, with no Concord - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Wesfahrn Simply because they increase server load per person. Maybe there are 250.000 acounts, but only about 125.000 actual people playing the game. Which is why people are knocking you for not understanding the technic...
- by Nekopyat - at 2010.02.04 20:43:00
|
7. EVE Online, with no Concord - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Nekopyat on 03/02/2010 00:38:55 Originally by: Wesfahrn No the problem is lag. The problem is people hold multiple accounts, which drains more server resources per person. Not... really. Alts, even if they are off grindi...
- by Nekopyat - at 2010.02.03 00:38:00
|
8. EVE Online, with no Concord - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Wesfahrn Anyway there is a threshold as to how many people the server can support, and as it looks like now CCP has a game even one single server where both gameplay types exist(A dumbed down, and an intelligent one). I thi...
- by Nekopyat - at 2010.02.02 20:37:00
|
9. EVE Online, with no Concord - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Skex Relbore I'd say the only reason EVE hasn't gone pure carebear yet is because the servers are about maxed out already and hte only way they could support the subscription levels would be to do away with the single shard...
- by Nekopyat - at 2010.02.02 17:41:00
|
10. EVE Online, with no Concord - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Dantes Revenge Since there are so many Eve players more interested in their kill rankings than playing the game, it would go the same way. Noobs = easy targets and more kills on the board and other players are too busy defe...
- by Nekopyat - at 2010.02.02 14:56:00
|
11. A "Walking-In-Stations" question - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
CCP has not talked much about what one will actually be able to do in WiS, but yeah, combat has been explicitly mentioned as being out. As far as I can tell, WiS is a glorified version of one of those 3D teleconference clients that people were cr...
- by Nekopyat - at 2010.02.02 14:48:00
|
12. EVE Online, with no Concord - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Platoon Sergeant You want to get players hooked, you get their adrenaline pumping. More accurately, if you want to get a particular TYPE of player hooked, that is what you do. What makes EVE work where pure PvP games fa...
- by Nekopyat - at 2010.02.02 05:39:00
|
13. EVE Online, with no Concord - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Ranger 1 I might agree with you except for one thing. Some of the most secure space to be found in EVE (except during times of invasion) is the space at the heart of a major 0.0 alliance. There players easily provide all th...
- by Nekopyat - at 2010.02.01 22:09:00
|
14. EVE Online, with no Concord - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Xauxau Not most of the time, not almost all the time, but _every_ _single_ _time_. Having cut my teeth in the land of MUD/MURPE, this matches my experience too. I think 'player operated security' is one of those holy gra...
- by Nekopyat - at 2010.02.01 20:29:00
|
15. EVE Online, with no Concord - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Nekopyat on 01/02/2010 17:14:25 While I would personally quit, the OP might have a point for the health of EVE in general. I am thinking back to the Trammel/Felucca split in UO. When they introduced the PvE server, 90% of the peopl...
- by Nekopyat - at 2010.02.01 17:07:00
|
16. Was I right to be angry? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Nekopyat on 26/01/2010 01:01:52 Originally by: NyteTyger Of course, my answer to that was to spend 16m 50s training Infomorph Psychology for a blank jump clone. If I recall correctly, does not that require an 8+ standin...
- by Nekopyat - at 2010.01.26 00:58:00
|
17. Was I right to be angry? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: NyteTyger And if you don't know how to save a pod, you should stick to station trading. To be fair, not everyone can save their pod. Depending on their rig and connection it is not guaranteed, even in high-sec, that the...
- by Nekopyat - at 2010.01.25 20:41:00
|
18. If CCP Launched Another EVE Server... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Natasha Ashatan I doubt you would find many PvP players (as they would still be on TQ). So basically you have a very sparsely populated nullsec/lowesec player base (of which most are probably not engaging in PvP activity) ...
- by Nekopyat - at 2010.01.20 17:40:00
|
19. If CCP Launched Another EVE Server... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
See, if we were going to have some kind of 'reset', I would rather have a 'down in flames' style one. Something like the Jove finally get close to kicking the mortal coil and decide to take everyone else with them so they sweep through laying wast...
- by Nekopyat - at 2010.01.19 21:52:00
|
20. Lack of symmetry............ - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Aloriana Jacques 2. In space you don't need to be symmetrical because there's no aerodynamics to worry about. 1. EVE is not in space, it is underwater. 2. If EVE were in space, we would have Newtonian physics to worry a...
- by Nekopyat - at 2010.01.13 19:19:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |