Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 20 30 40 50 |
161. Null Sec Fix [How to make null fun again] @CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Scatim Helicon wrote: Sure, but let's make highsec stations destructible too. But isn't high sec meant to be a safe place? IMO null is too carebear and should not have the same station safety as you would in high sec. Ofcourse a goon would ...
- by NickyYo - at 2013.01.16 21:56:00
|
162. Updated JackKnife Api - in EVE Technology Lab [original thread]
Is there a class with this that contains all the api queries & calculations that one could include on another site?
- by NickyYo - at 2013.01.16 15:33:00
|
163. CSM don't represent eve they represent the forums. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: NickyYo wrote: If CCP were to introduce a new tab in the station next to the clone tab that would inform people, i think this could do it. This button would open up a nice interactive screen explaining what a CSM is, at the e...
- by NickyYo - at 2013.01.16 14:20:00
|
164. CSM don't represent eve they represent the forums. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
If CCP were to introduce a new tab in the station next to the clone tab that would inform people, i think this could do it. This button would open up a nice interactive screen explaining what a CSM is, at the end of the test, have a couple multip...
- by NickyYo - at 2013.01.16 14:12:00
|
165. CSM don't represent eve they represent the forums. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Will CCP be doing more to get none forum users involved with CSM though the ingame client intead of just posting an advert at startup? We all know those who use forums like to whine, that meaning whiners wil vote for a whiny CSM.
- by NickyYo - at 2013.01.16 13:27:00
|
166. Null Sec Fix [How to make null fun again] @CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
A true sandbox is when null stations are destroyable. Think about it! Alliances creating campaigns to remove systems stations to create better beach heads that enemy alliances cannot take over and base out off. Past alliances/coalitions infrastr...
- by NickyYo - at 2013.01.16 12:56:00
|
167. A Drastic Change - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
What we need is some new game mechanics to restrict how much space an alliance can hold depending on variables.
- by NickyYo - at 2013.01.16 12:43:00
|
168. So hard to find a fleet/corp. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
StarHug is a good corp, put an application in and i will accept :)
- by NickyYo - at 2013.01.15 22:41:00
|
169. Any plants on new T2 ships for the next expansion? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
CCP Ytterbium wrote: Well, before introducing new tech2 ships we should ideally fix the existing hulls. By that we mainly mean Black Ops, Electronic Attack Ships, Command Ships, Heavy Assault Ships, but the list goes on. Command Ships are on ...
- by NickyYo - at 2013.01.15 14:49:00
|
170. Retribution 1.0.7 463858 SDE Conversions - in EVE Technology Lab [original thread]
Good Job! Cheers.
- by NickyYo - at 2013.01.15 11:09:00
|
171. This forum lately - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
LittleTerror wrote: Thomas Gore wrote: So why would we give a **** about your post, then? Because its genuine? As in, I'm a real human like you see walking around outside of your bedroom or living room, where ever it is you're sitting eac...
- by NickyYo - at 2013.01.15 11:00:00
|
172. Forums are a "small minority" - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: NickyYo wrote: source or its a lie Compare eve-search poster stats to character stats and then downplay that a bit due to alt posts, and then add in the normal active:lurker ratios. Anyway, it doesn't particularly matter wh...
- by NickyYo - at 2013.01.15 10:49:00
|
173. This forum lately - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
LittleTerror wrote: I've just been mulling over these forums while having my morning smoke, and I just can't get over the fact that some people really seem to think that people actually give a **** about them. amusing. I give a ****! so y...
- by NickyYo - at 2013.01.15 10:45:00
|
174. Forums are a "small minority" - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: Kai Sheia wrote: Yeah... As said, usually less than 10% of forum readers ever significantly post. And those who bother to browse forums much are a minority as well. Over my time in MMO's, it turns out that researching or studyi...
- by NickyYo - at 2013.01.15 04:01:00
|
175. Forums are a "small minority" - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Etherealclams wrote: How can this possibly be? I don't understand how you can play a game and not visit, post and talk on the forums. Are people just too lazy to care or do they just not know about them? It just baffles me. People only real...
- by NickyYo - at 2013.01.14 23:33:00
|
176. CCP petition response times - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: NickyYo wrote: CCP management have obviously increased the work loads of the DEVS who check the petitions, that will be the REAL reason for the lengthy responses, this has been going on since incarana. The petitions, that are...
- by NickyYo - at 2013.01.14 01:12:00
|
177. CCP petition response times - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
CCP management have obviously increased the work loads of the DEVS who check the petitions, that will be the REAL reason for the lengthy responses, this has been going on since incarana. The petitions, that are the standard highsec bears make; i ...
- by NickyYo - at 2013.01.14 01:03:00
|
178. D-Ore New & Annoucements - in EVE Technology Lab [original thread]
Honest feedback is best feedback. I do apps related to eve but i do them for ingame clients for isk rather than releasing them publicly. I'm just saying, add a day to your times frames it gives ya self slack, why the rush? If you want help on th...
- by NickyYo - at 2013.01.14 00:55:00
|
179. CCP petition response times - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: The petition system is overloaded with fluff from people who shouldn't be making petitions. Source please?
- by NickyYo - at 2013.01.13 23:56:00
|
180. D-Ore New & Annoucements - in EVE Technology Lab [original thread]
Devilen wrote: Isn't that the truth! Well development still pushes forward! Right now i have uploaded the newest version of Dore for drive run (the demo site) to allow op creation within I hope the next few hours to have the rest of it and tom...
- by NickyYo - at 2013.01.13 21:12:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 20 30 40 50 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |