Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 |
1. [Proposal] Automaticly set -10 standings to active war targets. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: NightmareX wrote: It also fixes the same issues by manually setting the corps / alliances you get war dec'ed by to -10 to take advantage of the proposed fix that makes you see the war targets in the correct overview tab...
- by NightmareX - at 2014.08.03 21:05:00
|
2. [Proposal] Automaticly set -10 standings to active war targets. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: NightmareX wrote: No, read what i wrote over in my quote. You are still wrong. No, in fact, you are wrong. And you are too self-centred to see it. Luckily for me, people that matter can see it, so your inane ramblings and ...
- by NightmareX - at 2014.08.03 20:53:00
|
3. [Proposal] Automaticly set -10 standings to active war targets. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: But you won;t be looking at your normal overview, you'll be looking at your WT overview and expecting to see WTs. What is the point is having a WT overview if all you are going to do is look at your normal overview anyway? At...
- by NightmareX - at 2014.08.03 20:33:00
|
4. [Proposal] Automaticly set -10 standings to active war targets. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: NightmareX wrote: If you modify your own War target overview tab, you are supposed to sort out war targets only in that tab. Nothing except for the war targets will appear in that overview tab. If someone sets their overvie...
- by NightmareX - at 2014.08.03 20:02:00
|
5. [Proposal] Automaticly set -10 standings to active war targets. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: No, YOU misunderstand. IF you DO change you overview, you will expect to see war targets on it, but in certain situations, you WON'T see them. That is inconsistent. I'm not talking about new players, I'm not talking about peo...
- by NightmareX - at 2014.08.03 19:17:00
|
6. [Proposal] Automaticly set -10 standings to active war targets. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: Right, so people in those corps, the members, will have their overviews set up and will expect to see their war targets. But in certain situations, their war targets won't show up (CEO forgets to tick box, defensive war dec), ...
- by NightmareX - at 2014.08.03 14:09:00
|
7. [Proposal] Automaticly set -10 standings to active war targets. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: I'm well aware, which is why I'm discussing the merits (or lack thereof) of your idea, while you throw attack after attack at me. No you aren't discussing as you puts out your opinions on something you haven't understood yet...
- by NightmareX - at 2014.08.03 13:47:00
|
8. [Proposal] Automaticly set -10 standings to active war targets. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: I'm not "mad" about anything. Fact is that no trolling is occurring. I disagree with you, that's all. While you can report whenever you want, they'll frown upon you reporting people because they don't agree with you. Now since...
- by NightmareX - at 2014.08.03 13:07:00
|
9. [Proposal] Automaticly set -10 standings to active war targets. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: lol, grow up. The answers are already in this thread. Even if I were to go back and link it all here, you'd still complain it's invalid. And you realise you are abusing the report function if you are reporting me fro trolling ...
- by NightmareX - at 2014.08.03 12:52:00
|
10. [Proposal] Automaticly set -10 standings to active war targets. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: People have explained in great detail, myself included. Just because you haven't bothered to read it doesn't mean it's not been explained. I'm not going to copy paste what you can go back and read now. Proof or it never happ...
- by NightmareX - at 2014.08.03 12:35:00
|
11. [Proposal] Automaticly set -10 standings to active war targets. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: Except there not "more people", there's just you. You throwing personal attacks at people and expecting that to make the CSM take you seriously. You can't expect someone to take you seriously when you are.... 1. Trolling. 2...
- by NightmareX - at 2014.08.03 12:24:00
|
12. [Proposal] Automaticly set -10 standings to active war targets. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: No, you clearly do not understand the issues as well as you thought you did. Clearly people have posted issues with your proposal here, and you've just ignored them And give me one more chance before what? What are you going ...
- by NightmareX - at 2014.08.03 12:20:00
|
13. [Proposal] Automaticly set -10 standings to active war targets. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: Here it is as simply as it can be put: Stop assuming people do not understand simply because they disagree with you. Your opinion is no more correct that anyone else's. If someone doesn't understand the problem, they c...
- by NightmareX - at 2014.08.03 12:13:00
|
14. [Proposal] Automaticly set -10 standings to active war targets. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: So quit crying and see if they fix it. When they do you can be damn sure I'll be pushing for change to wardec mechanics to make it harder again for you guys to just wardec everyone. No, because as i have said, the more peopl...
- by NightmareX - at 2014.08.03 12:12:00
|
15. [Proposal] Automaticly set -10 standings to active war targets. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: You are not a special snowflake, what you say is no more valid that what anyone else says. Stop acting like you are somehow MORE RIGHT than everyone else. Your idea is terrible, several of us have explained why, and you need t...
- by NightmareX - at 2014.08.03 11:59:00
|
16. [Proposal] Automaticly set -10 standings to active war targets. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: First off, yes it should be fixed, when there is capacity to do so and when it's a priority, which it isn't. Secondly, your "easy fix" contains automatic standing adjustments based of an option placed when a war is declared. ...
- by NightmareX - at 2014.08.03 11:46:00
|
17. [Proposal] Automaticly set -10 standings to active war targets. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: Wrong. I accept that the overview doesn't work entirely as it should, I just don;t think it's a priority change, I don't think your temporary fix is suitable, and I think that when it is fixed, there has to be another change t...
- by NightmareX - at 2014.08.03 11:12:00
|
18. [Proposal] Automaticly set -10 standings to active war targets. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: Please point out where in this thread I'm attacking you. Any time someong disagrees with you, you call them stupid. Your opinion isn't automatically right because you said it, so get over it. If you can't stop throwing around ...
- by NightmareX - at 2014.08.03 10:13:00
|
19. [Proposal] Automaticly set -10 standings to active war targets. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Mag's wrote: The simple fix, would be for CCP to actually enable the overview to work correctly as in the past. Why should they waste time creating this fix and making life even harder for others? CCP have done some pretty nice changes to the...
- by NightmareX - at 2014.08.03 03:45:00
|
20. [Proposal] Automaticly set -10 standings to active war targets. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: See, and you leap straight back to personal attacks. And you really expect people to take you seriously? And you haven't already done that like a million times already? And you expect that someone will take you seriously th...
- by NightmareX - at 2014.08.03 03:24:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |