Pages: [1] 2 |
1. eWarp or how to get tied up and gangraped - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
ALUCARD 1208 wrote: i do think the way in which you died was wrong nonah but how would canceling warp have saved you in the way you were fitted u still would have been sat there even allowing you to be pointed by a hic. making people invuln on...
- by NoNah - at 2013.11.29 14:29:00
|
2. eWarp or how to get tied up and gangraped - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
ALUCARD 1208 wrote: stop me if im wrong but all this whining about him not being able to light a cyno is a mute point he was in dead terrorists home system maybe he coulda just screamed in one of his channels and people undock and warp to him a...
- by NoNah - at 2013.11.29 13:41:00
|
3. Faction warfare "Friendly Fire problem" - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Cearain wrote: The faction war screen says amarr militia is allied with caldari. Why shouldn't we consider other amarr allies? Same reason we don't put much weight to any other part of the backstory and lore of the game. If what you're looki...
- by NoNah - at 2012.07.10 20:17:00
|
4. Faction warfare "Friendly Fire problem" - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Xuixien wrote: So you won't present an argument that militia members are not allied? I guess that settles it, NoNah . If you can't accept unknown players as being considered unknown aka neutral standing(regardless of wether you shoot or...
- by NoNah - at 2012.07.09 23:51:00
|
5. Faction warfare "Friendly Fire problem" - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Xuixien wrote: NoNah wrote: [It's funny how you keep falling back onto a a direct reply to a real life analogy. For a real life analogy to in any even remote way to be viable the LP must correpsonde compensation for some sort of goal achieve...
- by NoNah - at 2012.07.09 22:33:00
|
6. Faction warfare "Friendly Fire problem" - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Xuixien wrote: NoNah wrote: Again, taking things out of context. OP stated someone in the same militia killed him and then proceeded to conquer the plex. From a faction point of view, a pilot shot another capsuleer working for the same ffact...
- by NoNah - at 2012.07.09 22:06:00
|
7. Faction warfare "Friendly Fire problem" - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Batelle wrote: well, you were equating intentionally shooting a friendly with acceptable losses to the enemy required to achieve an objective, as if somehow shooting his fellow militia member was a necessary action in the pursuit of an objectiv...
- by NoNah - at 2012.07.09 21:59:00
|
8. Faction warfare "Friendly Fire problem" - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Batelle wrote: I do take issue with NoNah's comments here: Quote: According to op he's capturing plexes, some friendly casualties for territorial advancement is perfectly acceptable according to many of the "great nations" of the real life ...
- by NoNah - at 2012.07.09 21:10:00
|
9. Faction warfare "Friendly Fire problem" - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Cearain wrote: NoNah wrote: Carber wrote: i wasent set up to kill him i did not think he would attack me becourse we was allies. when he pointed me i was dead. So what you're saying is, if you had flown fit for pvp all would have been ...
- by NoNah - at 2012.07.09 21:01:00
|
10. Faction warfare "Friendly Fire problem" - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Xuixien wrote: Except it's not a "friendly casualty for territorial advancement" - it's a friendly casualty for personal interest. As much as I think shooting purples is stupid, players should have the freedom to do it. However, a sandbox d...
- by NoNah - at 2012.07.09 20:49:00
|
11. Faction warfare "Friendly Fire problem" - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
BolsterBomb wrote: I disagree your comment would mean that its ok for the US Marines to shoort the US Army and the US Navy to shoot the US Airforce I'm not suggesting it's ok, I'm suggesting it's accepted. Penalized, but accepted. Colla...
- by NoNah - at 2012.07.09 19:23:00
|
12. Faction warfare "Friendly Fire problem" - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Yatama Kautsuo wrote: life is a sandbox as well. guess what happens if you shoot friendlys in a war on purpose? that will be dealt with more harshly then when you shoot some random guy at the street... treason... sandbox does not mean that th...
- by NoNah - at 2012.07.09 18:32:00
|
13. Red Success! - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Victoria Sin wrote: How is the punisher useless? It's a great little frigate. No one said the frigate is useless, just that it's bad for the fleet. If a punisher is optimal, why are people flying destroyers? If it's filling a niche role, a...
- by NoNah - at 2012.07.09 08:09:00
|
14. Faction warfare "Friendly Fire problem" - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Xuixien wrote: Or better yet, making personal standings affect LP payouts for plexes. That would sure be poetic justice! Not that I disagree, but it'd in no way solve or help the topic at hand. =) What I was trying to achieve with aboveme...
- by NoNah - at 2012.07.09 04:06:00
|
15. Faction warfare "Friendly Fire problem" - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Xuixien wrote: I see purple-killing to be a problem; not so because I disagree with it, but more so because of the way people are able to avoid any real consequences from it. Yes, yes, EVE is a sandbox. That's why we love this game. However, a ...
- by NoNah - at 2012.07.09 02:41:00
|
16. Faction warfare "Friendly Fire problem" - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Kyle Ward wrote: Wow, lotta dumb posts in this thread. This is obviously exploiting. You kill a freindly in Hisec you get Concorded; you kill a friendly in FW you take a standings hit and get booted if you don't power-grind them back up. If he ...
- by NoNah - at 2012.07.09 02:22:00
|
17. Minmatar MIlitia @ T5! - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
I don't get it, what Team5peak are you all on?
- by NoNah - at 2012.07.09 00:35:00
|
18. Faction warfare "Friendly Fire problem" - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Carber wrote: i wasent set up to kill him i did not think he would attack me becourse we was allies. when he pointed me i was dead. I'm not trying to provoke you. You joined factional warfare which is an optional feature to promote pvp. In t...
- by NoNah - at 2012.07.08 22:41:00
|
19. Faction warfare "Friendly Fire problem" - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Carber wrote: i wasent set up to kill him i did not think he would attack me becourse we was allies. when he pointed me i was dead. So what you're saying is, if you had flown fit for pvp all would have been well?
- by NoNah - at 2012.07.08 17:16:00
|
20. Faction warfare "Friendly Fire problem" - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Carber wrote: he loses abit standings but he gets ALOT becourse he took a big site alone. So why could you not kill him again?
- by NoNah - at 2012.07.08 16:28:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |