Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 |
1. LHC malfunctions, Earth safe...for now. - in Out of Pod Experience [original thread]
Originally by: Ji Sama that should read NEAR speed of light. blame the scientist for the ignorance of the reporter. besides we can break the speed of light; its called overlightspeed! and that doesnt break relativity special/normal since ...
- by Ogul - at 2008.09.22 11:38:00
|
2. Jita tonight - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ignoring the problem for years and then coming up with a kneejerk solution during a cigarette break... Nice job. --- Don't put your trust in revolutions. They always come around again. That's why they're called revolutions. People die, and not...
- by Ogul - at 2008.09.21 15:58:00
|
3. Large Hadron Collider 'destroys God by accident' - in Out of Pod Experience [original thread]
Which god? I admit, the monotheistic religions would be screwed, but what if it happened to be one of the thousands of hinduistic gods? I just hope it wasn't the greek/roman god of wine... --- Don't put your trust in revolutions. They always com...
- by Ogul - at 2008.09.17 08:45:00
|
4. Misunderstood mathematical geniuses - in Out of Pod Experience [original thread]
Wish I had a nice picture ready... lim omega == infinity 3 --> 8 (variation of the first one in the OP) --- Don't put your trust in revolutions. They always come around again. That's why they're called revolutions. People die, and nothing cha...
- by Ogul - at 2008.09.17 07:14:00
|
5. He who we cannot name from WW2 - in Out of Pod Experience [original thread]
Meh, wasting your energy on wax figures... Just like Whoops Apocalypse ... He should have ripped off the head of some ******* that is still alive. --- Don't put your trust in revolutions. They always come around again. That's why they're called ...
- by Ogul - at 2008.09.15 17:06:00
|
6. Is ambulation vaporware? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Personally, I will enjoy the time before that crap hits Tranquility. And on topic: It's definitely not vaporware, because I am not that lucky. --- Don't put your trust in revolutions. They always come around again. That's why they're called revol...
- by Ogul - at 2008.09.15 16:58:00
|
7. The "airplane on a conveyor belt" thought experiment... just... ouch. - in Out of Pod Experience [original thread]
Originally by: Chainsaw Plankton right but to assume infinite thrust and infinite speed conveyor belts, and then to assume that the wheels have friction is just silly Following the train of logic that something capable of generating...
- by Ogul - at 2008.09.13 07:41:00
|
8. Lets Found the EVE Online Group of LHC ! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The LHC is pretty well balanced on the risk vs. reward scale. --- Don't put your trust in revolutions. They always come around again. That's why they're called revolutions. People die, and nothing changes.
- by Ogul - at 2008.09.12 10:05:00
|
9. Large Hadron Wasteofmoney - in Out of Pod Experience [original thread]
Capital idea. Let's restrict all research to immediately useful applications. Just like the CD player was a direct consequence of improving the record player. --- Don't put your trust in revolutions. They always come around again. That's why the...
- by Ogul - at 2008.09.11 07:25:00
|
10. Armageddon . . . the HAC killer?? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: BiggestT well explain why and ill concur. As i see it, with a 5% bonus to rof, that makes each gun the effectiveness of 1.05 turrets. A 5% bonus to rof means that the actual rof value gets multiplied with (1-bonus/100)...
- by Ogul - at 2008.09.04 11:09:00
|
11. Why not end the pretence and make highsec a safezone? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Felix Dzerzhinsky I still cannot understand why people had to join a pvp game and demand pve and safty. . .EvE was always about pvp. . .why are you people ruining that. Hmmm... what do you say to people who complain abou...
- by Ogul - at 2008.09.04 11:04:00
|
12. CCP claims lag and desync is "Normal Gameplay" - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Yea, remove the GM response. CCP doesn't want to publicly display their inconsistent actions. --- Don't put your trust in revolutions. They always come around again. That's why they're called revolutions. People die, and nothing changes.
- by Ogul - at 2008.09.04 10:55:00
|
13. Armageddon . . . the HAC killer?? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: BiggestT Wrong, eve bonus' compound, their not linear (for the benefit of all :D) so its 5*1.05*1.05*1.05*1.05*1.05.. just for rof.. You are incredibly wrong there. --- Don't put your trust in revolutions. They always ...
- by Ogul - at 2008.09.04 10:51:00
|
14. Why we need a SIGNIFICANT nerf on lvl4s in hisec. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Ki An 2k isk is nothing. As I said, I get around 9k isk per lp. I don't even crash the market when getting these sums, as the actual amount of stuff I move is pretty small. The LP store has opened up avenues for extreme wea...
- by Ogul - at 2008.09.02 05:41:00
|
15. Why we need a SIGNIFICANT nerf on lvl4s in hisec. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Malcanis Originally by: Dionisius as lowsec is controled by pirates That's a contingent circumstance, not a law of nature. Just sayin' And a clear indicator that the imaginary risk vs. reward isn't near a...
- by Ogul - at 2008.08.31 09:42:00
|
16. T2 Invention Prices and the Market - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Clair Bear That's why. Someone with a monopoly on a good which constitutes 80% of the item build cost can afford to make the unpopular t2 items at far far FAR below 'cost', offload them and make a profit while still selling...
- by Ogul - at 2008.08.30 23:24:00
|
17. Why we need a SIGNIFICANT nerf on lvl4s in hisec. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Maximillian Bayonette You have now described how WoW works. Now, try to read up on how Eve works. The magnitude of your idiocy is impressive. --- Don't put your trust in revolutions. They always come around again. That...
- by Ogul - at 2008.08.30 15:58:00
|
18. Why we need a SIGNIFICANT nerf on lvl4s in hisec. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Maximillian Bayonette Normally, relevance is determined by common sense. You wouldn't know about that, though. In the absence of facts or logic to prove their claims people tend to come up with "common sense". --- Don...
- by Ogul - at 2008.08.30 14:03:00
|
19. Why we need a SIGNIFICANT nerf on lvl4s in hisec. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Gamesguy I don't think I've ever died in highsec outside of a war. I've died....67 times in lowsec/0.0, according to battleclinic, whats 67 divided by 0? Would only make sense if those 67 losses would be unrelated to...
- by Ogul - at 2008.08.30 11:05:00
|
20. Why we need a SIGNIFICANT nerf on lvl4s in hisec. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Ogul on 30/08/2008 10:56:32 Originally by: Gamesguy So then you would have no problem with moving to lowsec since its so low risk? I don't lose ships because I'm careful, most mission runners would die within 15 minutes o...
- by Ogul - at 2008.08.30 10:56:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |