Pages: [1] 2 3 |
1. I can haz Incarna CQ ponies!? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Absolutely awesome. I'd love to be able to pipe in my own, arbitrary video... Maybe pull something from an RSS feed, or subscribe to a YouTube channel.
- by Olvel - at 2011.07.12 17:39:00
|
2. What have i been paying with? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Spaceman Jack So vanity items will not be destructible because someone paid real money for them? WTF have I been paying my subscription with then for the past 8 years? Seems like real money to me and my bank account. By tha...
- by Olvel - at 2011.07.12 15:13:00
|
3. if you're gonna add new aurum clothes, - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Tosser Galore Yeah it will soon turn into second life eve with player designed **** skins and outfits. Why not? We've already got players who never undock - spend all their time playing the market or doing manufacturin...
- by Olvel - at 2011.07.08 19:20:00
|
4. Will Incarna eventually give us a crew for our ship? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Just because you are in a pod inside your battleship, doesn't mean anyone else is. You're plugged into everything so that the ship reacts faster, becomes an extension of your body. But that doesn't mean that absolutely everything is automated. I...
- by Olvel - at 2011.07.08 19:17:00
|
5. Would you recommend EVE? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I recommend EVE all the time. Just dragged some new players into it from one of the other forums I frequent. It's an awesome game.
- by Olvel - at 2011.07.08 19:14:00
|
6. How did we get here ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Am I the only one who's noticed all the repeated statements from CCP over the years stating that they wanted to implement a complete virtual universe? I see all sorts of folks complaining about DUST or Incarna or whatever taking time/money/reso...
- by Olvel - at 2011.07.08 19:09:00
|
7. Eve subscriptions - Paying for development of WOD and DUST - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Most companies work on more than one project at a time. And most of those projects overlap in some way. Sure, right now some portion of the proceeds from EVE is going to fund development for WoD and DUST. Some portion of those proceeds is also g...
- by Olvel - at 2011.07.06 14:26:00
|
8. Do we need to spell it out: We don't want Incarna - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Zeet A'Dron Incarna adds nothing the core player really wants. Incarna doesn't add much, that's for sure. I can't say I'm all that amazed with my little in-station apartment... But I do want Incarna. I want the rest of ...
- by Olvel - at 2011.07.06 14:22:00
|
9. Top ten reasons the protest failed - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Jonathan Ferguson Could you give me a rough example of how that discussion might have gone? Because if somebody with honest grievances was turned off by what the protesters did then certainly we can learn from that. For t...
- by Olvel - at 2011.07.06 02:03:00
|
10. EVE Online logo - not seen this mentioned anywhere else - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Very nice. ...now I'm going to have to dig out my Robocop DVD...
- by Olvel - at 2011.07.06 01:45:00
|
11. Time to act for CCP Customers, We Are not satisfied [petition] - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Graphiso CCP is treating us like customers have no rights..CCP, we are not your friends, family etc we pay you so we do have certain rights. It's a game. We're not talking about a heart/lung machine that's keeping you al...
- by Olvel - at 2011.07.06 01:41:00
|
12. A Viewpoint - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
/shrug Obviously CCP is going to do what it feels is best for the company and its games. That shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone. Whether CCP actually believes listening to the players is in its best interest is certainly open to debate, but ...
- by Olvel - at 2011.07.06 01:33:00
|
13. Top ten reasons the protest failed - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: AkJon Ferguson 1. Lack of a coherent message by the protesters. ... 6. EVE's ingrained culture of trolls Seriously. What was the protest even about? The "chief complaint" seemed to change from one day to the next. And hal...
- by Olvel - at 2011.07.06 01:25:00
|
14. @CCP Fallout - Ship Model Redesigns - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Awesome work so far. Can't wait to see what else you've got in store for us. Love my Noctis.
- by Olvel - at 2011.06.27 18:00:00
|
15. The question we all want answered. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Snake Scofield That simple yes or no will affect the course their company will take for years. It will affect eve, ccp, their employees and their shareholders. ...and the players. Which is why you are not going to see a ...
- by Olvel - at 2011.06.27 16:41:00
|
16. Funny how they can so quickly clarify SoE+CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Vierego So it didn't take long for them to go "YEA WE ARE NOT DEALING WITH THEM". Yet, the big question they are dodging around. Yea, it's coming. At this point they're going to have to respond quickly no matter how id...
- by Olvel - at 2011.06.26 20:32:00
|
17. Congratulations, Protestors. You've doomed your own cause. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Any successful MMOG is a partnership - a two-way street. CCP needs us players around to pay their bills. We need CCP around to keep EVE up and running. Granted, there are other games out there. But there's a reason I'm playing EVE instead of Fa...
- by Olvel - at 2011.06.26 20:26:00
|
18. So..now that your protest appears to have succeeded... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I would not claim that the protest succeeded. Folks were raging on Thursday and Friday, complaining that there wouldn't be a substantive response until Monday. Well, ok, it's Sunday. I guess that's a win? Except that the response still isn't subs...
- by Olvel - at 2011.06.26 20:22:00
|
19. No "gold ammo" had better damn well mean No Pay-to-Win! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Amberlamps As widely accepted a phrase gold ammo is to mean pay to win, in these circumstances it would be much easier for the community and CCP if they were literally say... NON VANITY ITEMS WILL NOT BE SOLD ON THE NOBLE E...
- by Olvel - at 2011.06.26 20:19:00
|
20. The media sees you and....agrees with - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Right. Because CCP is so unfamiliar with controversy...
- by Olvel - at 2011.06.26 20:12:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |