| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 |
1. Here's a thought - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Why not? It's better than gaming the system with alts.
- by Ori Blake - at 2011.02.08 18:03:00
|
2. Stupid is as Stupid does sir! - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Why yes, no one would join a fleet with the sole purpose of shooting on their members in an unguarded moment. I certainly wouldn't infiltrate five or more of my friends, wait for people to gather half-afk in the incursion system, and start getting...
- by Ori Blake - at 2011.01.27 01:40:00
|
3. New characters lack diversity - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I'm not a fan. My particular bloodline just feels a lot more generic than it used to.
- by Ori Blake - at 2011.01.18 21:41:00
|
4. Headline Suggestion: Concord goes on strike!!! - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Do it. Most bears will just log out the week or so it happens and let the skill queues run. Some may just quit because of it. And you get to enjoy EVE at 10k concurrent people again.
- by Ori Blake - at 2010.08.24 09:37:00
|
5. Isn't it about time local was changed to delayed mode already ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I'm still not convinced, but hey, formalize it in a proposal and lobby your CSM on it. I don't care myself if they do it or not, because I really don't lose out if it makes the game unplayable PvP wise. I can just keep playing like usual, and just...
- by Ori Blake - at 2010.08.23 23:30:00
|
6. Please join me in congratulating Goonswarm's EVE accomplishments. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
What always gets me about EVE is how little news is generated from combat ships fighting other combat ships. It's always alliances getting disbanded by people, or people wardeccing carbears, or killing macro mining barges, or suiciding freighters,...
- by Ori Blake - at 2010.08.20 02:33:00
|
7. Isn't it about time local was changed to delayed mode already ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Akita T Originally by: Zendoren It's never gong to happen! Except that we KNOW it will eventually happen. Just not soon enough. Quote: This thread needs to be either locked or moved to "Features and Ideas Di...
- by Ori Blake - at 2010.08.19 09:42:00
|
8. Isn't it about time local was changed to delayed mode already ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Stick Cult Depth = more covert fleets that are actually ~covert~, you know, not a fleet of stealth bombers given away in local the second they jump in... Which they can't do when warping into a system. So either we get...
- by Ori Blake - at 2010.08.18 16:28:00
|
9. Isn't it about time local was changed to delayed mode already ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I think it needs to be said again that Akita's intent wasn't just for this to be for 0.0, but highsec and lowsec as well, and there are a lot of issues delayed local raises in those regions. Scouting may not be possible given the smaller sizes of ...
- by Ori Blake - at 2010.08.18 15:36:00
|
10. Isn't it about time local was changed to delayed mode already ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Pr1ncess Alia Originally by: KhaniKirai Sorry, but delayed local, just means gankers get it easier. ok so answer me these questions three: how could it possibly be any easier for carebears? how could it poss...
- by Ori Blake - at 2010.08.16 20:32:00
|
11. Isn't it about time local was changed to delayed mode already ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Super Whopper I can't believe you guys are still responding to this thread. Let me explain Akita's motives. - Akita wants CCP to remove local in 0.0 so they kill whatever's keft of EVE, they're doing that anyway so why not ...
- by Ori Blake - at 2010.08.16 02:43:00
|
12. Isn't it about time local was changed to delayed mode already ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
1. Dscans don't show whether or not the target is a wartarget. Combine that with no local in hisec, and you'd make the defender unable to do things like mission or mine. The attacker would also have less abilty to just randomly find their wartarge...
- by Ori Blake - at 2010.08.15 20:07:00
|
13. Writing New Low Sec Stories: Challenges, Process, Tools - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
As long as you all don't forget the Factional Warfare Lowsec Story. Lowsec is more than pirates.
- by Ori Blake - at 2010.08.13 19:57:00
|
14. [Proposal] Cruiser Rats in 0.5 and 0.6 - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Slimy Worm Originally by: Ori Blake Quote: Risk (to PvP) vs. reward, not work (grinding) vs. reward, should determine ISK. Which is why cruiser rats in hisec should be less, per my point. Although as someon...
- by Ori Blake - at 2010.08.13 19:46:00
|
15. [Proposal] Cruiser Rats in 0.5 and 0.6 - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Quote: Risk (to PvP) vs. reward, not work (grinding) vs. reward, should determine ISK. Which is why cruiser rats in hisec should be less, per my point. Although as someone who does rat in lowsec, you have very little risk of PvP if you p...
- by Ori Blake - at 2010.08.12 22:10:00
|
16. [Proposal] Cruiser Rats in 0.5 and 0.6 - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Ere Colliseru Originally by: Ori Blake 50-75k is what you get for cruisers in lowsec. You'd have to make it 25-37k, and even then you'd be increasing salvage drops from it. Hmm but in lvl 4s in 0.5 you get 50-75k ...
- by Ori Blake - at 2010.08.12 01:09:00
|
17. GM caves to reimbursment demand - Dangerous precedent set - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
I think nearby wrecks extend to the same mission room or asteroid belt. I haven't tested it though.
- by Ori Blake - at 2010.08.11 15:50:00
|
18. [Proposal] Cruiser Rats in 0.5 and 0.6 - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Ere Colliseru I am all for some cruiser rats in 0.5 or 0.6. But as high sec mining has already seen quite some nerfs it should be only one cruiser in 0.6 and two in 0.5. A single hulk must still be able to tank it when activ...
- by Ori Blake - at 2010.08.11 15:38:00
|
19. [Proposal]Fix Faction Warfare NOW, Introduce Incarna later(WIS). - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Quote: Edit: as for the original topic, I don't give a rats ass. People in big nullsec alliances can't participate. It's just another failed minigame half the clientbase can't even try. That's good in my book. FW wont be an intro to PvP ...
- by Ori Blake - at 2010.08.11 15:31:00
|
20. GM caves to reimbursment demand - Dangerous precedent set - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
I can see why, I don't think CCP intended the aggressor to be able to maintain aggression perpetually by shooting wrecks, and mission runners provide so many wrecks that it is approaching grief level play. You can only abandon nearby wrecks, which...
- by Ori Blake - at 2010.08.11 15:21:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |