Pages: [1] |
1. [Proposal] A fresh take on blasters - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
bumping a great idea before my sub is up. see you when the walking in stations is up and running on sisi!
- by PTang - at 2011.02.28 00:35:00
|
2. [Request] Release the Neo Neocom beta with the next patch - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
yes please, bring it back. Also great to see only two people not support so far. As long it was optional, it was awesome. And if there was an exploit, someone needs to sill the beans.
- by PTang - at 2011.01.24 03:48:00
|
3. PI-wny did it need a nerf? - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
new PI system is less clicks same output. you'r doing it wrong.
- by PTang - at 2011.01.22 19:31:00
|
4. CCP Please remove level 4 missions. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
there is one issue... level3s can make as much if not more in some cases than level4's in the right ship. the whole mission system needs a rethink. like when they made factional warfare missions. the idea was 1.10-12 jumps away 2.the missio...
- by PTang - at 2011.01.16 11:12:00
|
5. CCP DONT LISTEN TO CSM - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
I agree they should make specialized freighters with jump drives.
- by PTang - at 2011.01.16 08:24:00
|
6. Proposal: CCP go back to spaceships after incarna is out. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Not supported, I hope they continue to work on incanra after release. eve has had just as constant space ship changes and additions over the years as it always had. When I started playing they only had 20 people in the whole office, and they ro...
- by PTang - at 2011.01.16 08:19:00
|
7. The CSM wants to get rid of Jump Bridges. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
but almost all of the csm are power block leadership.
- by PTang - at 2011.01.16 06:56:00
|
8. The CSM wants to get rid of Jump Bridges. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
The CSM are doing what the players want, I know I welcome this change. Of course it's not a change yet, just that about 90% of the player base wouldn't mind it being on the table.
- by PTang - at 2011.01.15 23:51:00
|
9. [Proposal] A fresh take on blasters - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
shameless bump
- by PTang - at 2011.01.11 09:26:00
|
10. Woah, I thought they balanced speed? - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
only idoits thought the nano nerf was meant to make it so ships were too slow. CCP knew what they were doing and just now players are starting to notice CCP didn't destory speed builds. Smart players have been doing it for years, and it's workin...
- by PTang - at 2011.01.09 21:56:00
|
11. [Request/proposal] Postpone new character creator - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Trebor Daehdoow If the new character creator launches with significant deficits, then the CSM will take up this issue with CCP. However, let us wait until we see what CCP releases next month before we get all upset. this...
- by PTang - at 2011.01.01 20:01:00
|
12. [ISSUE] Blasters 2.0 - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
meh
- by PTang - at 2011.01.01 19:35:00
|
13. [Proposal] A fresh take on blasters - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
full support. Would take a lot of balance but the idea is sound. Maybe rails should do MORE damage the longer they travel, since they are long range shell based weapons IN SPACE. Shouldn't they be more destructive at long range? I mean no fricti...
- by PTang - at 2011.01.01 19:29:00
|
14. [proposal] freeform formations- because it's about damn time - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Edited by: PTang on 30/07/2009 09:10:16 more
- by PTang - at 2009.07.30 09:10:00
|
Pages: [1] |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |