Pages: [1] 2 |
1. so where did the usability for t2 go?! - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Jurgen Cartis Ummm... T2 guns > best named T1, since they get the damage boost of the specialty skill, and T2 ammo. T2 range ammo is particularly good. T2 guns + 8% Spec bonus + fitting penalities + immense cap consu...
- by Paigan - at 2007.07.08 10:35:00
|
2. Faction missiles Vs Tech 2 Missiles - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
AS far as T2 torps are concearned: - javelins WERE somewhat overpowered in the past. Then they got tripple-nerfed to uselessness. - Rage torps were pretty useless from the start - T2 launchers with T1 ammo are useless most of the time, because 8...
- by Paigan - at 2007.07.05 21:26:00
|
3. STOP TRAIL ACOUNT ONCE AND FOR ALL - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: coolruningc Ok this is winding me up big time. to day in help all i see is dam ******* macrols spaming buy isk buy isk sel isk. Stop stop stop how you say. Whell sod it ban trail acounts. Or make people have an age verationg...
- by Paigan - at 2007.07.05 11:07:00
|
4. Chimera - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Paigan on 05/07/2007 10:42:36 Chimera (as well as Phoenix) HAS NO CPU PROBLEM. Stop saying that all the time. Maybe Capital Shield Transferers have a CPU problem, granted. But apart from that module, you can create perfect fittings...
- by Paigan - at 2007.07.05 10:41:00
|
5. Caldari Carriers - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Waxau Then your tank will be lacking, where other carriers wont be. If you keep it that simple without proper argumentation (or really reading what i wrote), then i will keep it that simple as well: No it doesn't :P -- T...
- by Paigan - at 2007.06.19 12:48:00
|
6. Caldari Carriers - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I can fit a chimera with only T2 stuff to tank around 4500dps (overall resistances) and have around 1 capital shield transfer and 1 capital energy transfer, iirc. Granted capital shield transfer do need way too much CPU and there is missing a cap...
- by Paigan - at 2007.06.19 09:30:00
|
7. LP Store - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Guess he means something like Caldari Navy Rokh for 800K LP or a +8% something implant or so. -- This game is still in beta stage
- by Paigan - at 2007.06.17 20:41:00
|
8. LVL5 missions for capitals? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
when i testet capital ships on sisi i found NO (gate-)mission at all where i could enter with my capital. either some/most/all L5 warp gates will be redone to handle capitals as well or this is pretty much of a joke... Not that it would surprise ...
- by Paigan - at 2007.06.16 10:10:00
|
9. New Implants - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Mikal Drey hey hey @ CCP : Very Nice. Almost perfect \o/ What kind of thread is this? Either paste some stats or set up a discussion or whatever. If i'd open an empty thread for each feature i like in eve, i'd surely g...
- by Paigan - at 2007.06.15 13:39:00
|
10. Test server: Requests for account reactivation and unbanning - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Greetings. My account was reactivated (and changed password) one day before the announced mirror. Still i can't login to sisi. I tried to contact you via IRC, as written above, but that didn't really work. So could my account be reactivated cor...
- by Paigan - at 2007.06.15 13:26:00
|
11. Cycle timer, please... - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
/signed You mean something like the spell cooldown clock thingy from Warcraft III / WoW? However: We all know that Ergonomical GUI is nothing that CCP cares / is capable of. Still it would be a nice (and surely very basic) thing to have. Like 23...
- by Paigan - at 2007.06.10 10:49:00
|
12. Bug in the new patch - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Paigan on 08/06/2007 22:00:31 I (and other guys i know) have those ui_... displayed string variable name bugs since the very first kali version. On TQ, of course. Thought this was known and just ignored, like dozends of other thing...
- by Paigan - at 2007.06.08 21:58:00
|
13. warp scrambling should be looked at again - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Paigan on 07/06/2007 22:25:52 I support this idea. Warp scambling is too primitive at the moment. Either 100% or 0%, have a scrambler or have none, be stabbed or be prey. Boring, frustrating (for both hunters and targets at times)...
- by Paigan - at 2007.06.07 22:24:00
|
14. L5 auto stage aggro: Thanks CCP (NOT meant cynical :) - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Bozse Massive agro isn't the sollution to harder missions / complexes, what u describe will be tanked by a frigg and a remote repairing ship with ease. Aslong as u can force a whole mission / complex spawn to agro just one ...
- by Paigan - at 2007.05.18 22:54:00
|
15. Questions regarding L5 Missions and Passive Shield Tanks - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Paigan on 18/05/2007 22:32:29 Battlecruise shield recharge time was increased from 1250sec to 1400sec. Meaning an effective tanking reduction of around 11% for BC passive shield tanks. Level5 rewards look pretty temporary/unfinishe...
- by Paigan - at 2007.05.18 22:32:00
|
16. Bombs and Mineral Compression - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Paigan on 16/05/2007 22:12:55 Originally by: William Alex There is a point where 'realism' needs to take a back seat to playability. As it is, loot fills your cargo hold extremely fast. This impacts both PvE and PvP. ...
- by Paigan - at 2007.05.16 22:13:00
|
17. Bombs and Mineral Compression - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Paigan on 16/05/2007 13:23:39 Edited by: Paigan on 16/05/2007 13:22:27 Edited by: Paigan on 16/05/2007 13:21:29 Mineral compresion as a whole badly needs to be looked at. Some items have a compression rate of XXX to one. La...
- by Paigan - at 2007.05.16 13:21:00
|
18. L5 auto stage aggro: Thanks CCP (NOT meant cynical :) - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Paigan on 16/05/2007 11:04:19 No, this is NOT meant cynical. I think it's a good - no: it's the ONLY way to go for missions. As far as i have seen until now, all level5 missions consist only of one big spawn that completely aggroe...
- by Paigan - at 2007.05.16 10:56:00
|
19. Give cans a life and kill off the cans - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Or simply BRING MINING OUT OF BETA STAGE so that people aren't forced to use the can mining workaround-abuse anymore. If the industrials didn't get their refining module during eve beta phase, then in god's name cut ore volumes by 10 (or more) so...
- by Paigan - at 2007.05.15 13:16:00
|
20. billboard move pls - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Paigan on 15/05/2007 09:26:19 Originally by: raven415 how about just making the the billboards a projection from the gate thus not solid. Now THAT's a good idea. Would be even less work for the server to do (zero) and wo...
- by Paigan - at 2007.05.15 09:28:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |