Pages: [1] 2 3 |
1. Sticky:[June] Fighter Damage Reduction - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Chance Ravinne wrote: Lightbringer wrote: Does the stupid faction BS Nerf take into account this just as stupid nerf aswell? Yesterday people complained the Battleship nerf would make Carriers the default king of the meta. Now CCP is deal...
- by Petrified - at 2017.06.09 21:49:27
|
2. Sticky:[June] Fighter Damage Reduction - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
If the issue is that rewards are too easy, then nerfing something used in both PvP and PvE does not make a lot of sense. People will simply change to another ship that will give the damage output they desire for running sites. Perhaps the probl...
- by Petrified - at 2017.06.09 11:26:28
|
3. Sticky:[119.6] Standup Thukker Capital Component rigs - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
HandelsPharmi wrote: Petrified wrote: Kinda curious why the Thukker module is being turned into a rig and not into a service module like the Hyasyoda? I do not understand, why the Hyasyoda becomes a modules and not a rig ... Modules c...
- by Petrified - at 2017.05.18 08:04:19
|
4. Sticky:[119.6] Standup Thukker Capital Component rigs - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Kinda curious why the Thukker module is being turned into a rig and not into a service module like the Hyasyoda?
- by Petrified - at 2017.05.18 00:09:52
|
5. Sticky:[Mini-blog] The Next Steps in Structure Transition - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
HandelsPharmi wrote: Petrified wrote: What happens with the current Outpost Eggs? Do we get reimbursed for them? Will they be converted to rigless faction Fortizars? Why allow outpost eggs to be built still if they cannot otherwise be plante...
- by Petrified - at 2017.05.13 02:59:26
|
6. Sticky:[Mini-blog] The Next Steps in Structure Transition - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
What happens with the current Outpost Eggs? Do we get reimbursed for them? Will they be converted to rigless faction Fortizars? Why allow outpost eggs to be built still if they cannot otherwise be planted?
- by Petrified - at 2017.05.12 22:40:39
|
7. Sticky:[Mini-blog] The Next Steps in Structure Transition - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
xOmGx wrote: Why the F you want to remove POS after over 10 years of good service? Why you want us to pay 10-20 time MORE for LESS functionality and protection? ( no forcefield, no automated guns) Where are my laser guns on the citadels? all ...
- by Petrified - at 2017.04.12 22:46:18
|
8. Sticky:[Mini-blog] The Next Steps in Structure Transition - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Rowells wrote: Petrified wrote: Akrasjel Lanate wrote: Scatim Helicon wrote: Haven't seen any mention of this elsewhere: is there any intention to alter/remove/etc the NPC stations in empire and pirate sov 0.0? No... why you ask ? ...
- by Petrified - at 2017.04.11 23:56:10
|
9. Sticky:[Mini-blog] The Next Steps in Structure Transition - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Akrasjel Lanate wrote: Scatim Helicon wrote: Haven't seen any mention of this elsewhere: is there any intention to alter/remove/etc the NPC stations in empire and pirate sov 0.0? No... why you ask ? Likely because they don't like the fr...
- by Petrified - at 2017.04.11 21:18:11
|
10. Sticky:[Mini-blog] The Next Steps in Structure Transition - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Ripard Teg wrote: Good changes! It looks like you guys have put a lot of thought into this, and it shows. Two questions: You mention that during the transition, some assets will be automatically to asset safety "as needed". Can you elaborate? ...
- by Petrified - at 2017.04.11 21:12:59
|
11. Sticky:[May] CONCORD Aerospace Promotional Ships - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Chance Ravinne wrote: I'm not saying they shouldn't be limited. But there's a difference between Genolution limited and "I had a couple thousand dollars lying around, so now I own this ship" limited. While the announcement smells of Fresh S...
- by Petrified - at 2017.04.04 05:02:51
|
12. Sticky:[March] Balance Tweaks: Fighters, Supercarriers & Burst Proj... - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Malthuras wrote: progodlegend wrote: ITT: tears over not being able to carrier rat for 100mil ticks anymore. tears over not being able to obliterate subcaps with impunity anymore. Adapt or Die git gud learn 2 play This is why someone...
- by Petrified - at 2017.02.24 03:36:04
|
13. Sticky:[March] Balance Tweaks: Fighters, Supercarriers & Burst Proj... - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
lanyaie wrote: This has been a bad day for all of my ships.. Support Fighters - Signature Radius: 120 (+80) Why did support fighters get such a massive increase? Especially considering there's only 3 of them in a squadron, why weren't they ...
- by Petrified - at 2017.02.23 23:59:04
|
14. Sticky:[March] Rorqual and Mining changes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
An interesting solution to PANIC mode being used as an invulnerable Cyno, entosis, and tackle platform... consistent with your policy regarding POS garrage doors and invulnerability on Cyno and tackle generation. But like others have said: it me...
- by Petrified - at 2017.02.23 23:42:24
|
15. [Feedback Request] Custom probe formation in the scanning system - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Chance Ravinne wrote: While you're at it, can you make Pinpoint the default formation? I rarely use the spread formation. Having the pinpoint as default would be very helpful. I am a bit lazy in my scanning so I don't use custom formations...
- by Petrified - at 2016.12.19 04:06:46
|
16. Sticky:[December] Ending the deployment of new outposts and upgrades - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Cade Windstalker wrote: Petrified wrote: Are they perfect? I have a few gripes, (parity of services not withstanding) such as being locked into modules when the structure is damaged. I can appreciate not swapping with a combat timer, but no...
- by Petrified - at 2016.12.09 03:42:00
|
17. Sticky:[December] Ending the deployment of new outposts and upgrades - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
CCP Lebowski wrote: Tom Stonehoof wrote: There are changes that much of the playerbase did not think relevant to the gameplay or longevity of this game. If you could point me towards all this negative sentiment towards removing POS's and ...
- by Petrified - at 2016.12.08 22:19:04
|
18. Sticky:[December] Excavator Mining Drone yield rebalance - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
A bit curious why this rather expensive drone is being nerfed. I don't use a Rorqual (I don't mine much or often) but the idea that you now have a decent reason to use one in the belt was nice. If Rorquals can tackle with impunity, may Citadels a...
- by Petrified - at 2016.12.08 02:06:48
|
19. Sticky:[December] Ending the deployment of new outposts and upgrades - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Dreamer Targaryen wrote: With the removal of the ability to deploy new outposts now, you also remove the ability "get" those things, if you don't already own an outpost. Wouldn't it be more practical to take that away from us once there is alre...
- by Petrified - at 2016.12.08 01:44:22
|
20. Sticky:[December] Defender Missiles - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Glad to see defender missiles getting some love. YAY, more reasons for destroyers to be used. Not sure if this is the kind of healthy love they need, however. Not sure why the mechanics would prevent this from becoming a proper PDS to shoot down...
- by Petrified - at 2016.11.26 07:06:24
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |