Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
181. Sticky:[March] Rorqual and Mining changes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Grymwulf wrote: Querns wrote: [quote=Grymwulf][quote=Querns] https://www.fuzzwork.co.uk/info/?typeid=42890 Hit the attributes tab, scroll all the way to the bottom. ECMResistance 0%. (This value is inverted; 0% means "immune.") Edit: Sa...
- by Querns - at 2017.02.23 21:54:07
|
182. Sticky:[March] Rorqual and Mining changes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Vagizzle Schrimshank wrote: Querns wrote: Anya Aivora wrote: What you have now done has made it so panic is completely useless. They can't use panic when ecm'd. Wrong. Industrial cores provide full ECM immunity when running. (Times ...
- by Querns - at 2017.02.23 21:38:50
|
183. Sticky:[March] Rorqual and Mining changes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Grymwulf wrote: Querns wrote: Anya Aivora wrote: What you have now done has made it so panic is completely useless. They can't use panic when ecm'd. Wrong. Industrial cores provide full ECM immunity when running. (Times I have repea...
- by Querns - at 2017.02.23 21:37:46
|
184. Sticky:[March] Rorqual and Mining changes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Anya Aivora wrote: What you have now done has made it so panic is completely useless. They can't use panic when ecm'd. Wrong. Industrial cores provide full ECM immunity when running. (Times I have repeated this: 3)
- by Querns - at 2017.02.23 21:22:46
|
185. Sticky:[March] Balance Tweaks: Fighters, Supercarriers & Burst Proj... - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Glad to see the poor Wyvern shown some love. Thanks!
- by Querns - at 2017.02.23 21:18:32
|
186. Sticky:[March] Rorqual and Mining changes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Bronson Hughes wrote: Attackers bring EWAR to the belt? No PANIC. Wrong. The Industrial Core provides full EWAR immunity.
- by Querns - at 2017.02.23 21:14:36
|
187. Sticky:[March] Rorqual and Mining changes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Side1Bu2Rnz9 wrote: Fun fact... With this change regular T2 mining drones will mine at about 1/3rd the m3/minute as the escavators while remaining at about 1500 times less expensive. Way to nerf rorquals and escavator drones into the dirt... ...
- by Querns - at 2017.02.23 20:40:04
|
188. Sticky:[March] Rorqual and Mining changes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
The spreading out of ore anomalies seems sort of unusual and arbitrary, to me. Where I'm from, folks siege right on top of a rock. When the rock is exhausted, they warp to a perch, then to another rock. Does CCP have metrics stating that a signifi...
- by Querns - at 2017.02.23 20:18:33
|
189. Sticky:[March] Rorqual and Mining changes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Panther X wrote: You want me to stop mining? Increase the Security Class of some of our systems. Kill the broken True Sec of Delve, and move it to Vale :) Broken truesec doesn't affect ore anomalies. We only get 10% yield anoms in -0.85 or...
- by Querns - at 2017.02.23 20:02:00
|
190. Sticky:[March] Rorqual and Mining changes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Vic Jefferson wrote: Amazing fix for PANIC. Amazing incentive for killing the drones - this makes using rorquals a bit riskier even if the ship itself is not directly threatened. I mean I guess if CCP released some numbers on how much was bei...
- by Querns - at 2017.02.23 19:00:04
|
191. Sticky:[March] Rorqual and Mining changes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Wibla wrote: Caleb Ayrania wrote: "We're planning another reduction in Excavator drone yield to help keep the mineral economy healthy." .. WOW Such timing.. because its not already lost 50% of its value.. and I doubt it will be enough "fixi...
- by Querns - at 2017.02.23 18:48:43
|
192. Sticky:[March] Rorqual and Mining changes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Shalmon Aliatus wrote: The only way to fix that would be to take away all the unnerfed ore mined by Rorquals since the patch. Please tell me if you plan to do this, because in that case I need to rent a bigger car to buy all the popcorn I ne...
- by Querns - at 2017.02.23 18:40:43
|
193. Sticky:[March] Rorqual and Mining changes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Well, I lied, I guess I will comment on the nerf: was there a technical challenge involved with giving PANIC the same malus to electronic warfare capacitor usage that Networked Sensor Arrays have, or was it a deliberate decision to not go that route?
- by Querns - at 2017.02.23 18:19:54
|
194. Sticky:[March] Rorqual and Mining changes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Whole lotta folks not twigging to the fact that sieging the rorqual gives you ECM immunity ITT. I won't comment directly on the nerf, but I do offer this: If the goal here is to help buttress mineral prices, consider taking a look at the mineral ...
- by Querns - at 2017.02.23 18:17:04
|
195. Sticky:[March] Mobile Warp Disruptor changes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
like T3Cs for nullsec ratting, are you high
- by Querns - at 2017.02.22 16:34:19
|
196. Sticky:[March] Mobile Warp Disruptor changes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
it is sort of surreal seeing all the completely plebian ratting arrangements being thrown out as typical or even desirable itt
- by Querns - at 2017.02.22 16:32:54
|
197. Sticky:[March] Mobile Warp Disruptor changes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Orca Platypus wrote: James Zealot wrote: I don't think it's fair to say that the entire cost of a PLEX is calculated into this. If all you have that alt for is this, then you're doing eve wrong. Also, unless those bubbles get popped, all you...
- by Querns - at 2017.02.22 15:07:41
|
198. Sticky:[March] Mobile Warp Disruptor changes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Agreed that the bubble lifetime is far too high. Reduce significantly.
- by Querns - at 2017.02.22 15:04:26
|
199. Sticky:[March] Mobile Warp Disruptor changes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Ashterothi wrote: My only real concern about this is a faction item being a t2 and not t1. But that is pretty minor. Better not look too closely at faction capital guns, then.
- by Querns - at 2017.02.21 18:37:31
|
200. Sticky:[March] Mobile Warp Disruptor changes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Alderson Point wrote: Querns wrote: I'd also support interdiction nullification being effective for anchored bubbles, but not for warp disrupt probes and/or warp disruption field generators. No change needed, interceptors are fine as th...
- by Querns - at 2017.02.21 17:57:06
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |