Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 [100] |
1981. Sticky:Dev Blog: The Impact of the Council of Stellar Management - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
mkint wrote: Querns wrote: Dinsdale Pirannha wrote: I, like so many other sane people, don't use the launcher, but boot up from the .exe file. Guess what, nothing about the CSM. But thanks for playing, here are your fabulous parting gi...
- by Querns - at 2014.04.21 19:59:00
|
1982. Sticky:Dev Blog: Reprocess all the things! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Rashnu Gorbani wrote: I'm really curious what will the outcome be, but for the time being the most profitable would probably be unsubbing the extra accounts I used for industry, there's no way the masses could compete with the power blocks. I g...
- by Querns - at 2014.04.21 18:29:00
|
1983. Sticky:Dev blog: Building better Worlds - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
DooDoo Gum wrote: Querns wrote: This is probably the first post in the history of the forums that has actually used ellipses correctly. i thought ellipses were meant to shorten sentences? They are, and while it's definitely being abuse...
- by Querns - at 2014.04.21 17:33:00
|
1984. Sticky:Dev blog: Building better Worlds - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Alyxportur wrote: marly cortez wrote: Seems CCP is ... PVP all the way guys, if it moves shoot it. Want more ... industry ... that will attract ... Players ... win win win for you. If you read that ... you might think I was ... hilarious ....
- by Querns - at 2014.04.21 17:16:00
|
1985. Sticky:Dev blog: Building better Worlds - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
marly cortez wrote: Seems CCP is making great efforts to murder there baby with death designed by a thousand cuts , PVP all the way guys, if it moves shoot it. Want more space, we will give you more space, odd they never noticed that the vast ...
- by Querns - at 2014.04.21 16:33:00
|
1986. Sticky:Dev blog: Building better Worlds - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Urziel99 wrote: Querns wrote: Vigilant wrote: Plenty of backwater systems with little to no traffic that could be mined all day and night by a few people. And with local still being completely on in regular space, and 14 layers of allianc...
- by Querns - at 2014.04.21 03:00:00
|
1987. Sticky:Dev blog: Building better Worlds - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Vigilant wrote: Plenty of backwater systems with little to no traffic that could be mined all day and night by a few people. And with local still being completely on in regular space, and 14 layers of alliance defenses (roams, intel, etc.) you ...
- by Querns - at 2014.04.21 01:51:00
|
1988. Sticky:Dev blog: Building better Worlds - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
With all the doom and gloom surrounding mining during a wardec, it makes you wonder how any mining occurs in nullsec, where you are not only effectively under a wardec from everyone at the same time, but also vulnerable to hotdrops.
- by Querns - at 2014.04.21 00:49:00
|
1989. Sticky:Dev Blog: The Impact of the Council of Stellar Management - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote: I, like so many other sane people, don't use the launcher, but boot up from the .exe file. Guess what, nothing about the CSM. But thanks for playing, here are your fabulous parting gifts. Why would you not use the...
- by Querns - at 2014.04.20 15:11:00
|
1990. Sticky:Dev blog: Building better Worlds - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Draconus Lofwyr wrote: but its still a nerf to those that worked for the standings. You'll have to console yourself with the previous decade of uninterrupted highsec POS hegemony. I feel like you'll get over it.
- by Querns - at 2014.04.19 22:01:00
|
1991. Sticky:Dev blog: Building better Worlds - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Draconus Lofwyr wrote: Querns wrote: Draconus Lofwyr wrote: tax reductions are corp standings. Not completely -- market tax reductions benefit from both faction and corp. You want both as high as possible. also not entirely, it dr...
- by Querns - at 2014.04.19 21:56:00
|
1992. Sticky:Dev blog: Building better Worlds - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Draconus Lofwyr wrote: tax reductions are corp standings. Not completely -- market tax reductions benefit from both faction and corp. You want both as high as possible.
- by Querns - at 2014.04.19 21:13:00
|
1993. Sticky:Dev blog: Building better Worlds - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Altessa Post wrote: Having a POS is no small thing and I believe it supposed to be difficult to have one. There are hundreds of small corp descriptions where you can read that they enthusiastically plan to set up a POS, --- one day. Most of th...
- by Querns - at 2014.04.18 23:02:00
|
1994. Sticky:Dev blog: Building better Worlds - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Maybe I should put it a different way. Given the cheese grater properties of acquiring standings in Eve: Online, name reasons why requiring standings for a POS is a good idea. NOTE: "I had to suffer for it so other should also have to either suff...
- by Querns - at 2014.04.18 22:53:00
|
1995. Sticky:Dev blog: Building better Worlds - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Barton Breau wrote: Querns wrote: Barton Breau wrote: A player with standing still benefits from the ability to set up another pos, moreover he can loose them ==> gameplay! And when the proposed changes take effect, even more peopl...
- by Querns - at 2014.04.18 22:46:00
|
1996. Sticky:Dev blog: Building better Worlds - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Or is "gameplay" only supposed to be available to those who meet the stringent requirements of "have rubbed their face against the cheese grater of Eve: Online standings for a sufficient amount of time?"
- by Querns - at 2014.04.18 22:33:00
|
1997. Sticky:Dev blog: Building better Worlds - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Barton Breau wrote: Querns wrote: Attempting to equate this with abolishing skill requirements or ship costs is a false equivalency. Neither of these are binary benefits; skills (in most cases) continue to benefit the thing for which they a...
- by Querns - at 2014.04.18 22:32:00
|
1998. Sticky:Dev blog: Building better Worlds - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Barton Breau wrote: Querns wrote: The status quo rewards a static grind for standings, which, upon completion, open up the whole oyster at once. Yea, noone ever bought the participation of a high standing character in his corp to depl...
- by Querns - at 2014.04.18 20:38:00
|
1999. Sticky:EVE API and Public CREST discussion - in EVE Technology Lab [original thread]
CCP FoxFour wrote: Polarina wrote: It would be lovely if we could get the names of the hangar divisions for a corporation. Going for the generic names Division 1 , Division 2 , Division 3 , etc., from invFlags is a bit dull. Definitely ...
- by Querns - at 2014.04.18 20:29:00
|
2000. Sticky:Dev blog: Building better Worlds - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
I wonder how many people in this thread didn't even know that trading incurred taxes, and that they could be ameliorated by having high standings.
- by Querns - at 2014.04.18 20:00:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 [100] |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |