Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
161. Sticky:Dev blog: Introducing Upwell Refineries - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Oh, another question: will the current significant bonus for sovereignty for reactions/moon mining be preserved?
- by Querns - at 2017.03.22 15:18:39
|
162. Sticky:Dev blog: Introducing Upwell Refineries - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
I'm glad to see CCP going ahead with the oft-requested change to moon mining to active harvest, and to changing reactions to a RAM activity. This should help everyone, considerably. Question: Will reactions have their own cost index, like current...
- by Querns - at 2017.03.22 15:17:13
|
163. Sticky:Dev Blog: PLEX Rework - Follow Up - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Good looking out on the brokers fee thing. Also, thanks for the clarification on the PLEX granularity thing. I was almost certain that <30 days of subscription time wouldn't happen, but it's still good to see some confirmation.
- by Querns - at 2017.03.21 17:26:53
|
164. Sticky:Dev blog: PLEX Changes On The Way! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Terminal Insanity wrote: pointing out that after these changes, any alpha account is now potentially a cyno alt. - infinite cyno alts. - infinite research jobs. just plex for an hour to install the jobs - infinite ganking alts. plex each alpha...
- by Querns - at 2017.03.16 17:09:34
|
165. Sticky:Dev blog: PLEX Changes On The Way! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
SIEGE RED wrote: Interesting, every bit of market data hints more than strongly at a CSM leak prior to this devblog. It was already weird, yet now it's clear. If it was, it wasn't our guys. Rule #1 about this game is to NEVER sh it where C...
- by Querns - at 2017.03.16 16:32:30
|
166. Sticky:Dev blog: PLEX Changes On The Way! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
FYI: It would be extremely foolish of CCP to allow players to purchase game time in increments smaller than 30 days. It'd take about a week before the first out-of-game, API-backed application arises to monitor your subscription levels and only pr...
- by Querns - at 2017.03.16 16:07:53
|
167. Sticky:Dev blog: PLEX Changes On The Way! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Messenger Of Truth wrote: Why not divide plex by 1000, then call the new currency a micro-plex? That would at least be SI unit compliant. That'd be a milliplex. Microplex would require you to divide by 1,000,000. :reject:
- by Querns - at 2017.03.16 15:17:25
|
168. Sticky:Dev blog: PLEX Changes On The Way! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Question: Will players be able to move PLEX into their Vault remotely, or do they have to be present at the inventory location of the PLEX to do so?
- by Querns - at 2017.03.16 15:15:47
|
169. Sticky:Dev blog: PLEX Changes On The Way! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Blath Wilt wrote: Querns wrote: I want to know "why" does a new player have to handle / move around plex?...... Make zero sense, they actually never have to be moved with all the remote features that apply to it now. Also, the old rule of if ...
- by Querns - at 2017.03.16 15:10:50
|
170. Sticky:Dev blog: PLEX Changes On The Way! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Tonto Auri wrote: What next, though? AUR as hard money? What's next for AUR is it being taken behind the woodshed. you see it's funny because aurum means "gold" and the dog in this metaphor is ol' yeller
- by Querns - at 2017.03.16 15:05:24
|
171. Sticky:Dev blog: PLEX Changes On The Way! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Rivr Luzade wrote: Querns wrote: but I understand completely that making it easier for new players to handle PLEX is necessary. I don't have metrics on how many folks quit playing after suffering a PLEX transport loss, but I bet y'all do. ...
- by Querns - at 2017.03.16 14:59:16
|
172. Sticky:Dev blog: PLEX Changes On The Way! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Sam Guivenne wrote: 6: Ship Skins: This is pushing us towards Full Monetary Transactions for these which is something I find uncomfortable. There's no qualitative difference between how SKINs are purchased currently and how they'd be purc...
- by Querns - at 2017.03.16 14:50:18
|
173. Sticky:Dev blog: PLEX Changes On The Way! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Huh, interesting. Unifying PLEX and AUR is a very, very smart decision. Reducing bad complexity is always good. I'll be a little sad to see the "PLEX-tanked" killmails go away, but I understand completely that making it easier for new players to...
- by Querns - at 2017.03.16 14:32:54
|
174. Sticky:Monthly Economic Report - February 2017 - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Hrm. I thought the regional granularity was going away. Was this forgotten?
- by Querns - at 2017.03.06 16:20:27
|
175. High Sec Ganking - CONCORD Balance request - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
post your lossmail
- by Querns - at 2017.02.25 21:22:01
|
176. Sticky:[March] Rorqual and Mining changes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Karmastat wrote: However my real point - that only one person has commented on - is to remind CCP of the fact - that their servers know if u are near a celestial or not - so when the Panic Button is pressed that a simple data call to a routine...
- by Querns - at 2017.02.25 21:13:05
|
177. Sticky:[March] Rorqual and Mining changes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Vic Jefferson wrote: So I've done my fair share of blops against hardened and well defended sov space. The most important thing is speed - can my damage outpace the response fleet? Although one of the intentions of AegisSov was largely to punis...
- by Querns - at 2017.02.25 21:05:05
|
178. Sticky:[March] Rorqual and Mining changes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
It'd be interesting to see the actual data used to determine the health of the "mineral economy." We already know that CCP has no metrics for drone mining. If they did, it'd show up in the Monthly Economic Reports. Speaking as someone with intima...
- by Querns - at 2017.02.25 14:31:15
|
179. Sticky:[March] Rorqual and Mining changes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Nevyn Auscent wrote: Querns wrote: If the rorqual is in the belt, it's probably sieged. The purpose of PANIC is to allow you time to exit siege, so you can catch remote reps from escalating Force Auxiliaries. Unless it is moving between...
- by Querns - at 2017.02.23 22:01:42
|
180. Sticky:[March] Rorqual and Mining changes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Penance Toralen wrote: Querns wrote: Whole lotta folks not twigging to the fact that sieging the rorqual gives you ECM immunity ITT. I won't comment directly on the nerf, but I do offer this: If the goal here is to help buttress mineral pri...
- by Querns - at 2017.02.23 22:00:47
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |