Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 [90] 100 |
1781. MS Paint Art Contest - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Bob Maths wrote: http://i.imgur.com/ghBMrty.png you might want to call your physician
- by Rain6637 - at 2014.12.28 22:04:36
|
1782. Strange thing going on in EvE ?? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
glitch art is the coolest
- by Rain6637 - at 2014.12.28 22:00:03
|
1783. Rhea elimination of defunct char names --> block list? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
this takes me back to when ISK sellers (RMT) were rampant in locals everywhere.
- by Rain6637 - at 2014.12.28 21:23:42
|
1784. Rhea elimination of defunct char names --> block list? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
hah that's easy. someone who plays
- by Rain6637 - at 2014.12.28 21:11:17
|
1785. Rhea elimination of defunct char names --> block list? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
ooh cool question
- by Rain6637 - at 2014.12.28 21:06:44
|
1786. A Shout Out to ISD - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
They say we can't give you gifts, but I've found a workaround. A gift you can't refuse.
- by Rain6637 - at 2014.12.28 12:32:11
|
1787. A Shout Out to ISD - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Yo, stop beating around the bush and give us a straight answer.
- by Rain6637 - at 2014.12.28 10:39:33
|
1788. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
what are you doing posting, you should be undocking
- by Rain6637 - at 2014.12.28 10:22:40
|
1789. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Replacing ISBoxer has big implications and benefits everyone able to get in a fleet. It's basically a proliferation.
- by Rain6637 - at 2014.12.28 08:37:21
|
1790. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Updates seem to come slowly. Not sure what's up with that. I don't hold this issue against CCP -too much- because it makes sense to me how we got here. And it's just a situation, not necessarily one where one party has to "lose." By accident, the ...
- by Rain6637 - at 2014.12.28 06:43:55
|
1791. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I can't really answer that, and I guess I'm treating it like a foregone conclusion because I'm mostly helpless to CCP's balance decisions. I think requiring a lock would fix drones, and bombs could use a bit less HP to bring them down from the 7x ...
- by Rain6637 - at 2014.12.28 05:32:28
|
1792. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
bombs and drones are broken for other reasons. bombs because they're AOE, and drones because they're automated. I'm not sure what you mean by high horse. you'll have to explain that one to me before I can respond.
- by Rain6637 - at 2014.12.28 05:16:52
|
1793. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
those are balance issues, while ISBoxer is an issue of CCP selling a product (multiple clients) without supporting it.
- by Rain6637 - at 2014.12.28 05:03:06
|
1794. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
lock target, activate DPS, align to, jump, dock.
- by Rain6637 - at 2014.12.28 04:51:44
|
1795. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I think it's simple, without all the video tricks. Basically more leadership commands like warp and regroup. Which is not so far-fetched, unlike the task of implanting ISBoxer into the client.
- by Rain6637 - at 2014.12.28 04:38:27
|
1796. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I might have said something about income somewhere, so I'll take your word for it. I'm not, however, annoyed at ISBoxer, and we have coexisted in EVE peacefully. I am amused that EVE is bringing itself closer to tackling the issue of supporting mu...
- by Rain6637 - at 2014.12.28 04:12:10
|
1797. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
ISBoxer has been a crutch that EVE has leaned on to avoid supporting multiboxing in the client. Multiple clients are marketed as a thing, and I think it's assumed by everyone that multiple clients will be used advantageously and simultaneously, in...
- by Rain6637 - at 2014.12.28 03:16:28
|
1798. Quicksand box? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Holding on to a ship's prerequisites like it's something to protect is an example of pay to win mentality. The payment is subscriptions and the uber armor item is the ship. read that nice and slow and repeatedly until it becomes clear to you.
- by Rain6637 - at 2014.12.28 02:52:30
|
1799. Quicksand box? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
wouldn't a range of lower skilled ships help with gudfights and the everyone-is-tanky problem
- by Rain6637 - at 2014.12.27 03:52:27
|
1800. Quicksand box? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote: Innate decency. I'm pretty sure Mike is already running on the highsec carebear platform
- by Rain6637 - at 2014.12.27 01:59:21
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 [90] 100 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |