| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 |
1. Covert Reconfiguration Offensive Subsystems - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Hi The opinions expressed in my posts do represent my corp -------------------------- NOTR
- by Rajere - at 2010.02.08 14:44:00
|
2. Covert Reconfiguration Offensive Subsystems - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Well no ship which can use the portal states as much in the description :P Any ship with Jump Harmonics 2 is Covert Jump Bridgable, the Covert Reconfig Sub-system grants the Jump Harmonics 2 attribute. fin
- by Rajere - at 2009.06.10 18:27:00
|
3. Covert Reconfiguration Offensive Subsystems - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Mike C Tried it earlier, and apparently Strategic Cruisers with the covert subsystem can use a Black Ops' jump portal. Is this a bug, feature or "unintended feature"? It's a feature, which was already pointed out earlier ...
- by Rajere - at 2009.06.09 23:54:00
|
4. Covert Reconfiguration Offensive Subsystems - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
It never had the ability on Tranquility. Yeah, bubble immunity is way more convenient, it would certainly save time while traveling to your destination, but unless your covert pilots are terrible all it does is save time. If the gate camp is as h...
- by Rajere - at 2009.06.09 04:24:00
|
5. Covert Reconfiguration Offensive Subsystems - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Rajere on 08/06/2009 16:33:35 Um the Covert Reconfiguration subsystem never had the ability to fit a Covert Cyno on Tranquility. It was only on SiSi and it was pulled before they released the 4th sub-systems to TQ. The description o...
- by Rajere - at 2009.06.08 16:27:00
|
6. Covert Reconfiguration Offensive Subsystems - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Thanks for the clarification *note to self, have Lefevre bump all threads I need CCP response too*
- by Rajere - at 2009.05.25 16:19:00
|
7. Covert Reconfiguration Offensive Subsystems - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Still need to know the answer, I've also updated my bug report asking for clarification... The opinions expressed in my posts do represent my corp -------------------------- NOTR
- by Rajere - at 2009.05.25 00:49:00
|
8. Black Ops - Upcoming changes - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Rajere on 25/05/2009 00:36:10 Originally by: ZigZag Joe Originally by: Rajere ... BOs have 20% less shield/armor/structure of their T1 hulls. For a Redeemer, this works out to 1367 shields, 1661 armor, 1554 structure...
- by Rajere - at 2009.05.25 00:34:00
|
9. Blackops's turrets - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
terrible troll post The opinions expressed in my posts do represent my corp -------------------------- NOTR
- by Rajere - at 2009.05.25 00:03:00
|
10. Covert Reconfiguration Offensive Subsystems - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Rajere on 23/05/2009 22:38:30 patch notes said nothing about the Covert Cyno or the covert reconfig subsystem. And you can fit it in the latest version of EFT, just can't fit it in game. The opinions expressed in my posts do repre...
- by Rajere - at 2009.05.23 22:38:00
|
11. Black Ops - Upcoming changes - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Rajere on 23/05/2009 16:40:24 And that's the problem (and reason) why you can't give them the Marauder bonus. You can only have 8 lows and only need 4 highs (3 for weapons, 1 for cloak). You leave an extra highslot for a Utility Mod...
- by Rajere - at 2009.05.23 16:37:00
|
12. Covert Reconfiguration Offensive Subsystems - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Still no word? very simple clarification is all that i'm asking for. The opinions expressed in my posts do represent my corp -------------------------- NOTR
- by Rajere - at 2009.05.23 11:50:00
|
13. Black Ops - Upcoming changes - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I seriously doubt that CCP would go with the Marauder weapons + role bonuses option, honestly it's way more work just juggling around the slots than what's necessary to balance these ships. However, if you were going make them marauders, and move ...
- by Rajere - at 2009.05.23 11:24:00
|
14. Black Ops - Upcoming changes - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Rajere on 23/05/2009 10:52:11 Originally by: Captator No, I do not. I want blackops to be more than gankboats, for this to happen they have to have some field survivability in a small gang environment. I am quite prepared to...
- by Rajere - at 2009.05.23 10:51:00
|
15. Black Ops - Upcoming changes - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Rajere on 22/05/2009 15:25:14 Originally by: Captator Something like (restoring HP stats to t1 levels, cpu and grid would have to be tweaked): Originally by: Captator Stuff...free up slots for EWAR as well (excep...
- by Rajere - at 2009.05.22 15:24:00
|
16. Covert Reconfiguration Offensive Subsystems - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
bump :/ The opinions expressed in my posts do represent my corp -------------------------- NOTR
- by Rajere - at 2009.05.22 06:21:00
|
17. Black Ops - Upcoming changes - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Anderson You= WRONG. The simple fact that you can't even take 30 seconds to look at the actual ship models in game (CCP gave us that wonderful yet useless preview option), caused me to cease reading your post right there, ...
- by Rajere - at 2009.05.21 22:56:00
|
18. Cloaking Dictors - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
lol @ the people arguing against Deva about dictors. I'm intimately familiar with both dictors and blackops and yeah, it'd make things super easy if they let you bridge dictors. It's also blatantly obvious that it would make it stupid easy to use...
- by Rajere - at 2009.05.21 22:50:00
|
19. Black Ops - Upcoming changes - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Ahz Originally by: Rajere People who do not understand their role or even read the description want them to be glorified taxi's for lazy recon gangs, which isn't what they were designed to do... Maybe not, but this...
- by Rajere - at 2009.05.21 17:23:00
|
20. Covert Reconfiguration Offensive Subsystems - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Rajere on 21/05/2009 15:07:37 Got a response to my bug report: Quote: This report has been attached to a defect Ok, that still doesn't answer my question though, which is the defect? A: The item description text got rolle...
- by Rajere - at 2009.05.21 15:03:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |