Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 [300] |
5981. The solution to hiding from war in NPC corps? You decide. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Destiny Corrupted wrote: Do you know what will happen if wars become more expensive than suicide-ganking? It's all based on the amount of targets you get in the war declaration. It should be FAR cheaper to suicide gank one lonely carebear in ...
- by Reaver Glitterstim - at 2012.04.03 09:43:00
|
5982. The solution to hiding from war in NPC corps? You decide. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Don't get me wrong, I think that people who prey on the weak in highsec are losers and their tactics should not be supported. I think war costs should be continually revisited and adjusted until there are no longer a ridiculous number of baseless ...
- by Reaver Glitterstim - at 2012.04.03 09:19:00
|
5983. The solution to hiding from war in NPC corps? You decide. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I'm thinking all NPC corps in EVE except the starter corps should have wars with other corps in EVE, and players in one NPC corp could shoot war targets from another hostile NPC corp freely in empire space. And you should probably have a limit to ...
- by Reaver Glitterstim - at 2012.04.03 09:00:00
|
5984. CCP, you want suicide gankers in the game, cool - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I wouldn't be opposed to your suicide ganks incurring a loss of standing with your corp if it's a NPC corp, and if the standings go too low they kick you out.
- by Reaver Glitterstim - at 2012.04.03 08:56:00
|
5985. I want your little things! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
*note* several of these blur the line between issues and ideas. I'm simply offering the solutions I thought of, and if anyone else has any ideas to achieve the same goal, that's great too. Make signature resolution affect chance to hit vs. appa...
- by Reaver Glitterstim - at 2012.04.03 08:41:00
|
5986. CCP picked the wrong console. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Microsoft has always been what Sony is becoming. Sony used to be great, but I guess they finally realized they can stoop to Microsoft's level without losing customers. After all, there was literally zero competition against it. So what might have...
- by Reaver Glitterstim - at 2012.04.03 04:38:00
|
5987. The wonderful tech support guys at CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Seems every now and then I get some issue that causes EVE or my computer to run wonky or not at all. I can never figure it out so I end up asking for help everywhere I can think of. In the end, it's almost always some other program or a bad window...
- by Reaver Glitterstim - at 2012.04.03 04:28:00
|
5988. Badger CPU, buff or no? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
So anyways, the real reason I made this post was to make the point that the Badger Mark II (and perhaps other industrials as well) should have their CPU reduced. It is not a limiting factor at all in the case of a Badger Mark II, as it is literall...
- by Reaver Glitterstim - at 2012.03.31 21:10:00
|
5989. To all pubbies: how many of you plan on assisting Goons in the attack on Jita? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Mathias Hex wrote: Amarr Citizen 20120329 wrote: I am calling off the attack on Jita. Instead, we are changing plans and permanently moving into a c1 wormhole Did someone buy Mittardi or they make you change your name? I see you still hav...
- by Reaver Glitterstim - at 2012.03.31 02:16:00
|
5990. Badger CPU, buff or no? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Nalha Saldana wrote: Is there any way to fit a smokescreen cov ops cloak to it? Interesting you should think of this. I noted earlier that, while it's not possible to get even close with the Badger Mark II, it would potentially be possible to...
- by Reaver Glitterstim - at 2012.03.31 02:06:00
|
5991. Badger CPU, buff or no? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Here's the fit, if anyone's curious: Lows: Chelm's Modified Reactor Control Cormack's Modified Power Diagnostic x2 Mids: Pith X-Type Large Shield Booster Estamel's Modified ECM Multispectral Jammer x5 Highs: Deep Core Mining Laser I ...
- by Reaver Glitterstim - at 2012.03.31 01:11:00
|
5992. Badger CPU, buff or no? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Flurk Hellbron wrote: Wonder what you are trying to put on ur Badger II. I was going to come up with a fit that pushed the CPU past the mark, but after spending the last hour in EFT searching every nook and cranny for high CPU costing modules,...
- by Reaver Glitterstim - at 2012.03.31 01:04:00
|
5993. Badger CPU, buff or no? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
I don't know about you, but I always felt the Badger Mark II could use some more CPU. It's a shield-tanking ship, and it has 6 mid slots for a reason. It needs a lot of CPU to fit a proper tank. What do you guys think?
- by Reaver Glitterstim - at 2012.03.31 00:23:00
|
5994. I Officially Endorse The Goonswarm Jita Burn - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Alavaria Fera wrote: I personally want to try a blaster catalyst to try and gank some industrials just for the heck of it, so be prepared. I have a catalyst fit for you: Highs: Neutron Blaster Neutron Blaster Neutron Blaster Neut...
- by Reaver Glitterstim - at 2012.03.30 23:00:00
|
5995. Predictions on "Incursion Iteration" coming in Pre-Inferno Patch - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Xemnus wrote: Ladie Harlot wrote: Hopefully high sec incursions will no longer be the risk-free isk faucet they are today. Lucky we got a decent CSM to deal with the issue. I don't understand how High Sec incursions are an issue? Person...
- by Reaver Glitterstim - at 2012.03.30 22:50:00
|
5996. Antisemitism in Eve - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Vol Arm'OOO wrote: I find it sad that so many jewish people think the name of their race/religion/culture is a dirty word. I would be proud of it. Damned best bankers in the world! heya! srsly smart ppl ... for the most part. I notice hardly...
- by Reaver Glitterstim - at 2012.03.30 22:46:00
|
5997. Pubbie love - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
http://img.ehowcdn.co.uk/article-new/ds-photo/144/176/fotolia_12151042_XS.jpg I'm doing my part!
- by Reaver Glitterstim - at 2012.03.30 22:42:00
|
5998. I Officially Endorse The Goonswarm Jita Burn - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Khadann wrote: What are you guys talking about? can someone explain to me? Goons are taking over jita? They do that all the time. This time, they're actually setting fire to their own resources. You know, the stuff Jita Bears think they own...
- by Reaver Glitterstim - at 2012.03.30 22:28:00
|
5999. I Officially Endorse The Goonswarm Jita Burn - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ai Shun wrote: It is only a stupid commander that announces his exact battle plan before the engagement. You forget who the "commander" is dealing with.
- by Reaver Glitterstim - at 2012.03.30 22:21:00
|
6000. A sensible idea for insurance - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
ShahFluffers wrote: You'd have more ground to stand on then if you simply said, "remove all insurance." But then you'd run into opposition from people who believe it is necessary for young/poor people to PvP... and that the "bar" to engage in P...
- by Reaver Glitterstim - at 2012.03.30 22:16:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 [300] |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |