| Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
81. Making nullsec vibrant again - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Rer Eirikr wrote: Kieron VonDeux wrote: Reducing the range of influence of the larger organizations will allow smallers ones to take hold in far more areas. Kind of like why you trim the canopy of a large tree in order for smallers ones to g...
- by Riedle - at 2012.06.20 18:32:00
|
82. Making nullsec vibrant again - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Weaselior wrote: while it would be good for there to be a way an alliance can grow and evolve into something useful by restoring the old r64 balance your tiny corp of you and two friends will still always get stomped, as it should You are bo...
- by Riedle - at 2012.06.20 18:31:00
|
83. Making nullsec vibrant again - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Weaselior wrote: Kieron VonDeux wrote: Judging how much somebody had been in nullsec based upon the single character they happen to be posting with has always been folly. much like anyone who discusses how nice the air is on the moon can...
- by Riedle - at 2012.06.20 18:28:00
|
84. Making nullsec vibrant again - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Quote: you can't avoid PvP by traveling through jump bridges wot
- by Riedle - at 2012.06.20 18:16:00
|
85. Making nullsec vibrant again - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote: Riedle wrote: Perhaps. I don't really think of PL as Blobbers. They are the anti Blobbers if anything. They are the one Anti-SOV Alliance that is still able to project power. I think we need more of them - not less....
- by Riedle - at 2012.06.20 18:10:00
|
86. Making nullsec vibrant again - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Weaselior wrote: Riedle wrote: Perhaps. I don't really think of PL as Blobbers. They are the anti Blobbers if anything. They are the one Anti-SOV Alliance that is still able to project power. I think we need more of them - not less. Remov...
- by Riedle - at 2012.06.20 18:05:00
|
87. Making nullsec vibrant again - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Richard Desturned wrote: Riedle wrote: I want more people TO have an interest in SOV so we have more people to hunt. good point! however, I'll counter that with the fact the removal of jump bridges and jump drives would cause alliances, r...
- by Riedle - at 2012.06.20 18:02:00
|
88. Making nullsec vibrant again - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote: Riedle wrote: Says the guy that just insults people when they don't agree with him? ok, whatever floats your boat I guess. lols I dunno, irrefutable facts like how Pandemic Legion doesn't have a single jump bridge...
- by Riedle - at 2012.06.20 17:57:00
|
89. Making nullsec vibrant again - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Richard Desturned wrote: you seem to think that nerfing jump bridges would kill off large nullsec blocs, allow small alliances to settle in nullsec and magically fix the game fun fact: even if force projection was nerfed, the last thing we'd a...
- by Riedle - at 2012.06.20 17:53:00
|
90. Making nullsec vibrant again - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lord Zim wrote: Riedle wrote: But I know this to be incorrect as I have witnessed it many, many times. The only people who think JB's are good for null are the nullbears who depend on them. Yes, I'm sure you've actually been in nullsec. Y...
- by Riedle - at 2012.06.20 17:52:00
|
91. Making nullsec vibrant again - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Rer Eirikr wrote: Riedle wrote: In a null world where there are less gigantic napfests because there are nerfed or no jump bridges, there will be that much more risk in using these tools to project your power. How would nerfing JBs change...
- by Riedle - at 2012.06.20 17:51:00
|
92. Making nullsec vibrant again - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
dontbanmebro wrote: Riedle wrote: Well for someone who likes to tell others they are dumb... Your post is literally nonresponsive. I literally cannot continue the line of conversation because your post is irrelevant to the one you quoted ...
- by Riedle - at 2012.06.20 17:47:00
|
93. Making nullsec vibrant again - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Quote: So you're going to keep on thinking that jumpbridges are the force projection tools, and completely ignore jumpfreighters, carriers, rorquals, dreads, supercarriers and titans? But at least these have to be risked to use them. In a ...
- by Riedle - at 2012.06.20 17:43:00
|
94. Making nullsec vibrant again - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
dontbanmebro wrote: Riedle wrote: Surely if you aren't ever using JB's you wouldn't have set so many of them up and you wouldn't be so adamently opposed to nerfing the crap out of them would you? Except it's already been explained multipl...
- by Riedle - at 2012.06.20 17:39:00
|
95. Making nullsec vibrant again - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
dontbanmebro wrote: CCP likes blobs. They like mass warfare. They want to be able to say they packed x thousand faggots into one system for epic "player-driven content". Soundwave and the new head baldin guy said as much multiple times during p...
- by Riedle - at 2012.06.20 17:37:00
|
96. Making nullsec vibrant again - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lord Zim wrote: dontbanmebro wrote: Riedle wrote: PS: With the amount of anger coming from some of the biggest users of JB's, I'd say we are on the right track with nerfing them. "We should deport all x people from our country because ...
- by Riedle - at 2012.06.20 17:29:00
|
97. Making nullsec vibrant again - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
dontbanmebro wrote: Riedle wrote: PS: With the amount of anger coming from some of the biggest users of JB's, I'd say we are on the right track with nerfing them. "We should deport all x people from our country because they're all actuall...
- by Riedle - at 2012.06.20 17:24:00
|
98. Making nullsec vibrant again - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Richard Desturned wrote: Riedle wrote: Lord Zim wrote: Riedle wrote: It's not the whole answer but its part of it. It will nerf the BLOB. And, you're wrong. Compelling argument good chap. What's wrong with THE BIG BAD BLOB? Peo...
- by Riedle - at 2012.06.20 17:23:00
|
99. Making nullsec vibrant again - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lord Zim wrote: Riedle wrote: It's not the whole answer but its part of it. It will nerf the BLOB. And, you're wrong. Compelling argument good chap.
- by Riedle - at 2012.06.20 17:15:00
|
100. Making nullsec vibrant again - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Rer Eirikr wrote: What do Jump Bridges have to do with the fact that the CFC has a lot of allies in relatively close proximity to it? Rephrase, Jump Bridges do not create NAPfests, and vice-versa. Sov mechanics create NAPfests. SOV mechan...
- by Riedle - at 2012.06.20 17:13:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |