Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 |
361. Best cheap BC or smaller fleet to take down most L4 missioners? - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Dynast wrote: Roosterton wrote: sYnc Vir wrote: Or you could just join Faction Warfare, stop griffing players that don't want to pvp, grow balls and fight someone looking to kill you instead. Unless of course, this is too much for you. ...
- by Roosterton - at 2011.11.18 00:54:00
|
362. Baiting mission looters - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
sYnc Vir wrote: Have a Torp/Nuet phoon in system waiting. When they warp out to swap ships, do so to and meet them back on the gate. Let the 1100 dps 3 Heavy neut super fun time begin. I'm not so sure. Many ninjas fly small crap (cruiser -...
- by Roosterton - at 2011.11.17 16:04:00
|
363. Best cheap BC or smaller fleet to take down most L4 missioners? - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
sYnc Vir wrote: Or you could just join Faction Warfare, stop griffing players that don't want to pvp, grow balls and fight someone looking to kill you instead. Unless of course, this is too much for you. In Fw Skill points are not so much of ...
- by Roosterton - at 2011.11.17 15:58:00
|
364. What should CCP do about command ships vs T3? (spoiler alert: answer inside) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Fon Revedhort wrote: And what exactly prevented those inties from covering these 200 km to get those Falcons? What prevented Rokhs from popping them? Looks like you totally missed the point. What? Huh? You seem to be proving my point. As ...
- by Roosterton - at 2011.11.17 15:41:00
|
365. Photoshopped or not - This was badass - Make it so CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I would actually consider buying one with isk.
- by Roosterton - at 2011.11.17 01:45:00
|
366. Cenzorship, Internet - in Out of Pod Experience [original thread]
Canada is **** in regards to the internet, but not this ****. \o/
- by Roosterton - at 2011.11.17 01:44:00
|
367. What should CCP do about command ships vs T3? (spoiler alert: answer inside) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Fon Revedhort wrote: Roosterton wrote: Fon Revedhort wrote: People should address real issues instead of bitching about non-existant problems, I have to disagree. A T3 can only have one link operational without gimping itself by using ...
- by Roosterton - at 2011.11.17 01:41:00
|
368. Incursion Ship Advice - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
If you can fly a Legion, get one. They are welcome in virtually any armor VG fleet, due to a great tank, great tracking, and good optimal + dps. If you can't afford a Legion, an Abso will do alright as a substitute. Alternatively, get into a Guar...
- by Roosterton - at 2011.11.16 16:28:00
|
369. What should CCP do about command ships vs T3? (spoiler alert: answer inside) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Liang Nuren wrote: People should address real issues instead of bitching about non-existant problems, I have to disagree. A T3 can only have one link operational without gimping itself by using command processors to fit a full set - somethin...
- by Roosterton - at 2011.11.16 16:00:00
|
370. Unique Stations In Trade Hubs - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Quote: the current one outside jita in sisi is farily unique in that it's in a million pieces. Seriously? Hehehehehehe...
- by Roosterton - at 2011.11.15 16:31:00
|
371. A plan to give balance to cloaking (Images) - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Jint Hikaru wrote: Endeavour Starfleet wrote: Danika Princip wrote: Endeavour Starfleet wrote: The whole idea is removing the incentive to AFK. That includes wormholes which are plagued by the practice just as much. Edit: Also remembe...
- by Roosterton - at 2011.11.15 16:30:00
|
372. Idea: Make warfare links only affect your grid - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
No more feedback on this? Any CCP comments?
- by Roosterton - at 2011.11.15 16:28:00
|
373. CCP, to Bring Balance, Nerf AC's. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Quote: Wait, what? Auxiliary Nano Pump? I've fit too many active armour tanks recently. I'm missing something. You spend 18mil on an implant, so I decide to spend 18mil on skill hardwirings. ANP = Adaptive Nano Plating Quote: 1. Personal...
- by Roosterton - at 2011.11.15 16:09:00
|
374. CCP, to Bring Balance, Nerf AC's. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Firelord Ozai wrote: [quote=Roosterton] Quote: And Machs don't count because they're OP as hell. Angel does need a nerf, but not AC's in general. ~all I can do is sigh... at the idea of nerf'ing anything so far beyond insurable...shoul...
- by Roosterton - at 2011.11.15 07:34:00
|
375. CCP, to Bring Balance, Nerf AC's. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Quote: Now you're just arguing to argue. I'm done with the conversation. -Liang I really should have tried this line at some point during the past two days.
- by Roosterton - at 2011.11.15 05:42:00
|
376. CCP, to Bring Balance, Nerf AC's. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Zarnak Wulf wrote: New boosters do not have side effects. Any Minmatar want an extra 11% falloff to go with their TE? How about a 7.5% reduced sig? You can take two boosters at once now. What, where? And claiming that this only benefits M...
- by Roosterton - at 2011.11.15 05:16:00
|
377. CCP, to Bring Balance, Nerf AC's. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Quote: ITT we also learn that Neutron Blasters can get 1314dps at 39km. Void gets the 1314dps, and Iron gives you 14.4+12.5km range. Hilarious, you're so witty. Quote: Hmmm.... A 3% CPU implant costs 18mil. Why, let's spend 18mil on th...
- by Roosterton - at 2011.11.15 05:09:00
|
378. CCP, to Bring Balance, Nerf AC's. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Nimrod Nemesis wrote: Roosterton wrote: I gave it IN MF double its optimal, but reduced scorch's optimal to 2/3rds of what it actually was. So yes, it makes me look stupid, but it doesn't make me biased, or else I would have stated scorch's ...
- by Roosterton - at 2011.11.15 02:06:00
|
379. CCP, to Bring Balance, Nerf AC's. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Nimrod Nemesis wrote: Roosterton wrote: Oh the horror! It's grossly misleading! Rather than doing 1200 DPS to 30km, the Geddon does 1200 DPS to 15km and 1000 DPS to 45km! See this? This throws my entire post off! There's no way this guy is ...
- by Roosterton - at 2011.11.15 01:56:00
|
380. CCP, to Bring Balance, Nerf AC's. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Quote: Oh of course, this is about my e-honor. It's not as though i've been very explicit about how your "harmless mistake," was grossly misleading and very much outside the realm of hapless typos. Oh the horror! It's grossly misleading! Rat...
- by Roosterton - at 2011.11.14 23:39:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |