| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
1. Wormholes are rather boring and easily exploited. - in Wormholes [original thread]
Jack Miton wrote: go ask C5 dwellers hos fun Quarantine Areas are to run. I had a corp mate who used to enjoy them - ran a few with him now and again - if you aren't going all out to maximise ISK per hour it was kind of cool to just warp in ...
- by Rroff - at 2017.08.02 01:56:25
|
2. CCP has given up on EVE online, Stop giving them your money - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Austin Blythe wrote: Yep. CCP knows which way the wind is blowing in terms of PCU. Wouldn't surprise me if they follow Blizzard's lead and remove the server population display from the launcher and prevent third parties from obtaining that inf...
- by Rroff - at 2017.08.02 01:35:38
|
3. Does anyone actually use armor Loki now? It sucks. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote: Djsaeu wrote: I love it, cry some more. It is so sad that you cant have everything you want. "NOT" As I tell my children, adapt or die. O, how about this, just stop playing the game, which sure looks like an opti...
- by Rroff - at 2017.07.22 15:35:11
|
4. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Dracvlad wrote: LOL just noted him in a fleet of T3's flying a Megathron, that is classy... Megathron is awesome - I would have taken the Kronos in its old form over a Prot every time if it wasn't for the vulnerability to capitals and bombs...
- by Rroff - at 2017.04.21 21:39:00
|
5. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Cade Windstalker wrote: And you seem to have missed my point entirely, you say "those ships should" but there's no *reason* they "should" have that application advantage. As I showed, with sourced evidence, they never had it, they've never nee...
- by Rroff - at 2017.04.21 21:27:37
|
6. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Cade Windstalker wrote: snip.... You misunderstood a bit what I meant with the Deimos - it "should" have that tracking advantage over a T3 - all of those ships "should" have that damage application advantage over their respective T3 counterp...
- by Rroff - at 2017.04.21 19:51:26
|
7. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Keno Skir wrote: [quote=Rroff] Not playing the game puts your opinions on it's current state in question. I'm sure there will be no shortage of people queuing up to tell me when and where I'm wrong ;)
- by Rroff - at 2017.04.21 17:24:10
|
8. Why no capships in high-sec? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
^^ True but things like tier 3 BCs, bombing runs and carrier fighters have kind of tilted the balance a bit, compounding the warp speed changes to make BS quite a lot less desirable to bring to a fight.
- by Rroff - at 2017.04.21 16:51:32
|
9. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Dracvlad wrote: I read that in another thread on this subject and assumed it was correct, just checked on one of my characters and it is 6.31 seconds, and for my Loki it is 6.36 seconds, that is still doable. The base stats for the nullifi...
- by Rroff - at 2017.04.21 16:48:12
|
10. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Frostys Virpio wrote: Rroff wrote: HACs are more of the attack versus combat variety - something CCP seems to apply somewhat patchily but there it is - this is a fairly succinct summary of it: There are 2 HACs per faction. There is not...
- by Rroff - at 2017.04.21 15:22:59
|
11. Triage and Tethering - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Cade Windstalker wrote: There's nothing in Triage preventing you from being Warp Scrambled. You have an ECM resistance and a Sensor Dampener Resistance, but no defense against Warp Scrambling and nothing prevents someone from activating such a...
- by Rroff - at 2017.04.21 15:14:56
|
12. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Cade Windstalker wrote: Saying "well the specialty of HACs should be..." with no reasoning or evidence behind the assertion is a ridiculous statement to make. Regardless of what you think the specialty of HACs should be we can clearly see what...
- by Rroff - at 2017.04.21 15:01:44
|
13. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Dracvlad wrote: I just need to point out that the nomadic life is made possible by nullification and covert ops cloaks. They are actually quite slow to align at 8.5 seconds without any nano's or inertias so those people calling for nerfs to al...
- by Rroff - at 2017.04.21 13:48:45
|
14. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Gimme Sake wrote: Maybe I'm wrong but haven't seen anyone doing pve in a proteus (200k ehp, cough, cough). http://imgur.com/uKC1G8I
You have now :p We occasionally used them (PVP fit) in wormholes with guardians for PVE but not very o...
- by Rroff - at 2017.04.21 12:12:06
|
15. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Gimme Sake wrote: The reason for the rebalance is pvp not pve. You can do a 5/10 in Cerberus if that's your major worry. One way or another it will still affect PVE though - ignoring the PVE element when making any changes to T3Cs would be...
- by Rroff - at 2017.04.21 11:36:56
|
16. Triage and Tethering - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
No idea how it works now but I believe HIC focused point works through triage? which should also in theory prevent you tethering but no idea of the state of that ingame as I've not played in awhile. If it doesn't currently that is definitely how ...
- by Rroff - at 2017.04.21 10:24:21
|
17. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Cade Windstalker wrote: So, first off, I disagree with your assessment of HACs. There are HACs that are good fleet boats and HACs that are good active-tanked solo and small gang ships. In both cases the T3C is the flat out better option. The H...
- by Rroff - at 2017.04.21 10:04:26
|
18. Not enough stuff is being destroyed - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Teros Hakomairos wrote: So convert PVE into some kind of "simulated PVP" will only cause MORE people to leave frustrated.... Depends a bit on the approach. Doing C5/6 sites with capital escalations the group way is actually quite interesti...
- by Rroff - at 2017.04.20 22:46:19
|
19. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Cade Windstalker wrote: and so far yours are repetitive and lacking. Largely that is because the arguments they are in response to are also repetitive lacking - not aimed at anyone specifically but most people don't progress beyond one dimen...
- by Rroff - at 2017.04.20 21:02:10
|
20. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Nasar Vyron wrote: Personally, I would leave their damage intact as I really actually don't see a problem here considering they are T3 and in order to get some of these BB damage numbers you're sacrificing tank or agility (as you should). I wo...
- by Rroff - at 2017.04.20 17:43:40
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |