| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
21. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: You are putting up an awful lot of fight for someone not bothered if CCP nerf T3C down to cruiser/navy cruiser levels. I don't even play the game any more and unlikely to again - but I still have an interest in the game and ...
- by Rroff - at 2017.04.20 17:11:22
|
22. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Cade Windstalker wrote: Rails are absolutely a viable option here, you just don't seem to like the trade-offs they require in DPS and tracking. That doesn't mean that they're not usable though, it means that you either don't like them for arbi...
- by Rroff - at 2017.04.20 17:00:38
|
23. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Cade Windstalker wrote: The primary things about these ships that are OP are the tank and the DPS. Those are the same things that are allowing your fit to work. Mind you while the DPS numbers are very high - the fit that has been talked abo...
- by Rroff - at 2017.04.20 16:32:06
|
24. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
March rabbit wrote: You talk about "today's Eve". What do you mean by this? For instance when I started playing the game things like tier 3s (battlecruisers), stealth bombers, the current shape of carrier fighters, dreads (even low angle ...
- by Rroff - at 2017.04.20 14:27:32
|
25. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Cade Windstalker wrote: No, it's literally pretty much just because T3Cs are way better than them at everything they do. There's plenty of room for a fast, tanky fleet DPS ship in a Cruiser or BC hull size with decent damage projection, DPS, a...
- by Rroff - at 2017.04.20 10:29:26
|
26. Alphas and F2P Have Failed - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ti-di isn't just about latency - with the amount of data required when fights get that big and server IO and other hardware/software performance bottlenecks it is pretty much required for reliable, albeit delayed, gameplay - the alternative is eit...
- by Rroff - at 2017.04.19 22:04:03
|
27. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Cade Windstalker wrote: And in the span of ~3 pages we've apparently gone from "there is no replacement for this ship" to "oh I'll just go and fly this other thing..." There is no replacement within the realms of "normal" stuff - you seem ...
- by Rroff - at 2017.04.19 21:20:53
|
28. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Keno Skir wrote: Hold that thought. Overpowered T3 argument shave been a thing for years now. If you haven't noticed it's because you haven't had your ear to the ground. I'm not saying that's a bad thing, except in the case you end up in a d...
- by Rroff - at 2017.04.19 17:32:57
|
29. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: Same argument was used against the nano nerfs. People don't like having a FOTM nerfed and a lot abuse it. I've heard a fair bit of grumbling about nano in my time.
- by Rroff - at 2017.04.19 16:46:10
|
30. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jenn aSide wrote: All moot, CCP IS changing T3Cs, and most of us support their efforts. Personally outside of these forums I've never heard anyone particularly unhappy with T3 cruisers - and a lot of my game time was spent in a coalition of...
- by Rroff - at 2017.04.19 16:39:26
|
31. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: Rroff wrote: Pedantically - Strategic cruiser and based off of sleeper tech where the sleeper drones also have somewhat out of class capabilities in terms of EHP, sig and mobility, etc. AKA overpowered. Not arguing they ...
- by Rroff - at 2017.04.19 16:12:48
|
32. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Pedantically - Strategic cruiser and based off of sleeper tech where the sleeper drones also have somewhat out of class capabilities in terms of EHP, sig and mobility, etc.
- by Rroff - at 2017.04.19 16:01:29
|
33. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: The very fact you are having to compare a cruiser with a command ship (T2 battlecruiser) shows again how out of balance T3C are. Personally I think it faulty to look at them as a cruiser - T3s should be looked at in the lig...
- by Rroff - at 2017.04.19 15:38:47
|
34. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: Why? You are far more likely to stay in this game if you play with others than going solo. Game is so much better when playing with others - hated it that so many people were refining C5/6 wormhole sites into low risk solo ef...
- by Rroff - at 2017.04.19 15:34:19
|
35. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: Any why is that not an option given the fact that we are tossing around suicide dreadnoughts and carriers in fleets of hundreds? Last number I saw on supers was we had 20,000 of them and that was several years ago. Everyone is...
- by Rroff - at 2017.04.19 15:28:22
|
36. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: The only reason those ships are hamstrung is because T3C do the job so much better. Nope. Spent many many hours in those kind of engagements - most of the other "options" in the line for that role are too laughable in today...
- by Rroff - at 2017.04.19 15:07:04
|
37. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Frostys Virpio wrote: The reason nobody even consider the trade offs is because we all know there is a WTFPWNMOBILE that does it all in one package. Once your remove that "do it all" option, all the trade offs become interesting. The whole li...
- by Rroff - at 2017.04.19 14:55:10
|
38. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Gimme Sake wrote: or team up business. A lot of it should purely be in the realm of team up business - that is half of what is wrong with this game :s
- by Rroff - at 2017.04.19 12:14:28
|
39. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Cade Windstalker wrote: That's called a trade-off. If you want tons of EHP you sacrifice other things for it. If you want tons of speed, you sacrifice other things for it. If you can get all of the things at once the ship is OP. You also see...
- by Rroff - at 2017.04.19 05:02:47
|
40. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Asmodai Xodai wrote: That's exactly what jumped out and 'got' me too. I was like 'geez, the guy just listed the next 15 best options available, then threw the proteus in there for comparison, then concluded the proteus was by and large the onl...
- by Rroff - at 2017.04.18 21:43:27
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |