Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
1. Sticky:GM Response On Bumping - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
La Rynx wrote: I prefer absolute space, in this example its just about the motors which on a tank still are big AND the water resistance alongside the oiltanker. The tanker might be less anoyed. Tuggboats pull freightors into the harbor, but fr...
- by RubyPorto - at 2014.10.12 10:33:20
|
2. Sticky:GM Response On Bumping - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
La Rynx wrote: I prefer absolute space, in this example its just about the motors which on a tank still are big AND the water resistance alongside the oiltanker. The tanker might be less anoyed. Tuggboats pull freightors into the harbor, but fr...
- by RubyPorto - at 2014.10.12 10:33:00
|
3. Sticky:GM Response On Bumping - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
La Rynx wrote: A "best solution" would be the adaption of better force/mass relation. A smaller lighter ship bumping a fully loaded freighter? Seen what happens when a small car with 140 mph hits a truck a 30 mph truck? The truck flies nowwhere...
- by RubyPorto - at 2014.10.12 08:59:00
|
4. Sticky:GM Response On Bumping - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
La Rynx wrote: Not everything was planed from beginning and even if it would have been ( still was not ), things are "at flow". I never said anything about what the developers planned . I said something about what they currently want . As ...
- by RubyPorto - at 2014.10.10 00:19:00
|
5. Sticky:GM Response On Bumping - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
La Rynx wrote: RubyPorto wrote: You weren't aggressed. Nobody attacked you. Bumping is neither aggressive nor is it an attack. You make sense most of the time, but this is nonsense. Of course this is an aggressive action. Aggressive a...
- by RubyPorto - at 2014.10.09 13:31:00
|
6. Sticky:GM Response On Bumping - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
La Rynx wrote: RubyPorto wrote: CONCORD doesn't, and is not intended to provide protection to anyone. I did not ask for CONCORDE help, but when aggressed so hard, i think it would be OK to set the attacker to suspect. As said, in my exam...
- by RubyPorto - at 2014.10.08 22:41:00
|
7. Sticky:GM Response On Bumping - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
La Rynx wrote: Yes, so what? It is still bumping. And in those two cases of bumping, doing so allows you to circumvent other game mechanics in ways the developers do not want. POS Shields are meant to provide actual protection to anyone ins...
- by RubyPorto - at 2014.10.08 15:14:00
|
8. No matter how mad you get, take a deep breath and control that anger... - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
HoleySheet1 wrote: That plate of food just doesn't look appetizing. It's the strange thing about curry. The best homemade curry looks just as terrible as the worst microwave slop. I made a lamb vindaloo with roasted chilies (Fire stations...
- by RubyPorto - at 2014.10.02 01:22:00
|
9. "How Highsec miners threaten EVE, and how we can stop them.&quo... - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Iain Cariaba wrote: Veers Belvar wrote: the whole thing is a farce. 400 billion isk down the drain and more highsec mining than ever. It's obvious that the gank gank gank approach failed. What is needed is engagement with miners to show them...
- by RubyPorto - at 2014.09.29 05:08:00
|
10. Sticky:GM Response On Bumping - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Veers Belvar wrote: Did you bother reading the forum posts a couple of pages back by the Non-AFK freighter pilot who was bumped for 50 minutes with webber alts, and as a result had to self destruct his ship, biomass, and quit the game? Enough ...
- by RubyPorto - at 2014.09.28 01:22:00
|
11. ViRUS Pottage Corp Thief - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Lady Spank wrote: ISD Ezwal wrote: I have removed a rule breaking post and those quoting it.. The Rules: 4. Personal attacks are prohibited. Commonly known as flaming, personal attacks are posts that are designed to personally bera...
- by RubyPorto - at 2014.09.27 18:44:00
|
12. AFK Posting - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Shouldn't there be at least some downside to posting and going AFK?
- by RubyPorto - at 2014.09.27 17:03:00
|
13. ViRUS Pottage Corp Thief - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Nitshe wrote: it is one tower slipped that is why he stole it. Leto Thule I'm cursing at you but not typing just fyi. POINT IS I DON'T WANT OTHER CORPS TO SUFFER SHIP LOSE. I DONT CARE THE REST. NOW SHUT THE F UP LETO THULE from surely you...
- by RubyPorto - at 2014.09.26 18:31:00
|
14. ViRUS Pottage Corp Thief - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
As a former corpmate of ViRUS, I can confirm that he is quite perfectly honorable and is a good man. *Snip* Please refrain from personal attacks. ISD Ezwal. Now, does anybody else like Waffles ?
- by RubyPorto - at 2014.09.25 18:47:03
|
15. ViRUS Pottage Corp Thief - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
As a former corpmate of ViRUS, I can confirm that he is quite perfectly honorable and is a good man. OP's libelous dribble is unconscionable. Now, does anybody else like Waffles ?
- by RubyPorto - at 2014.09.25 18:47:00
|
16. Stolen Loot Sparks Incursion Drama - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Kamii OhnoKazii wrote: 3-4 motivated persons, with ISBoxer fleets can and at some point will shut down the whole incursion thing as a troll on the whole thing So... why would this be a game mechanical problem? You seem to have a problem wit...
- by RubyPorto - at 2014.09.20 00:18:00
|
17. Sticky:GM Response On Bumping - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Veers Belvar wrote: continue to feel that the bumping mechanic is being used to wrongfully pin down freighters without appropriate CONCORD response And yet you continue to refuse to provide a reason why CONCORD should become a proactive, pro...
- by RubyPorto - at 2014.09.18 01:20:00
|
18. Sticky:GM Response On Bumping - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Veers Belvar wrote: You certainly can hurt someone psychologically through in game actions. Nope. Just like you cannot be said to have hurt someone by playing Chess better than them. No matter how they may feel about the game. Quote: And...
- by RubyPorto - at 2014.09.15 06:32:00
|
19. Sticky:GM Response On Bumping - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Veers Belvar wrote: Not similar. Pouring fuel on the fire after you hurt someone, they are upset, and say they are quitting the game is not the same as gently ribbing someone who semi-threatened you after getting mildly annoyed at forum posts, ...
- by RubyPorto - at 2014.09.15 05:06:00
|
20. Sticky:GM Response On Bumping - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Veers Belvar wrote: Not trolling...just following up on the earlier post promising to blow freighters up because of my posts here. And the failure to respond to my post soon afterward about why such threat was unconvincing and unlikely to be ac...
- by RubyPorto - at 2014.09.15 03:28:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |