Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
1. Sticky:Dev blog: Strategic Cruisers and You - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Wouldnt it be easier and less hassle to just remove the rig slots (and balance/stat-tweak accordingly) rather than having an exception that allows them to be removed?
- by Scatim Helicon - at 2017.05.26 17:21:07
|
2. Sticky:Dev Blog: The Next Steps in Structure Transition - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Just curious: Whilst 0.0 ouposts are being removed are there any plans for changes of any sort to NPC-held outposts in pirate sovereignty 0.0 (or low/highsec, for that matter)?
- by Scatim Helicon - at 2017.05.04 21:56:16
|
3. Sticky:Dev blog: Monthly Economic Report - January 2017 - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Faith Winters wrote: Why? Certain players are trying to maintain a long-standing partisan narrative that Goonswarm don't use their space 'properly', that their occupancy of Delve is an aberration against other alliances who would make 'better...
- by Scatim Helicon - at 2017.02.11 20:42:33
|
4. Announcement:Dev Blog: Introducing Clone States & the Future of Acc... - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
What I'm most worried about is the scenario where a pile of curious Alpha State newbies show up and are promptly sent running in tears for the exit by the terminally awful NPE, as happened with previous influxes (This Is Eve, etc). What is CCP do...
- by Scatim Helicon - at 2016.08.31 22:43:07
|
5. Announcement:Dev Blog: Introducing Clone States & the Future of Acc... - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Mento Audrission wrote: The only question is......why? Because subscription numbers, as best as we can tell, have fallen off a cliff compared to a few years ago.
- by Scatim Helicon - at 2016.08.31 22:27:17
|
6. Announcement:Dev Blog: Introducing Clone States & the Future of Acc... - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Skimmed the blog again, didn't see this - what is the reduction in skill training rate for Alphas?
- by Scatim Helicon - at 2016.08.31 20:16:08
|
7. Announcement:Dev Blog: Introducing Clone States & the Future of Acc... - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Inevitable, and better implemented than it could have been. I'll add my +1 to the limitation of alpha accounts in use - if you allow subbed players to log in an alpha account simultaneously, literally every subbed player in 0.0 or lowsec will be ...
- by Scatim Helicon - at 2016.08.31 20:11:27
|
8. Announcement:[Citadels Release] Capital and Fighter Transition - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
CCP Lebowski wrote: For ships owned by neither a character nor a corporation (such as ships in a contract) we'll put them in the ship's main cargo hold, and then let the new owner sort it out when he gets the ship.
Is a ship float...
- by Scatim Helicon - at 2016.04.26 17:58:18
|
9. Sticky:Dev blog: Reworking Capital Ships: And thus it begins! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
A few questions (edit: ok, more than a few) that come up as I go through the devblog (ALL DEM WERDS): Fleet and Ship Hangars - - Are you anticipating that the existing hangar sizes be adjusted for caps which already feature these? - Will drea...
- by Scatim Helicon - at 2015.10.25 14:19:48
|
10. Sticky:Dev blog: Reworking Capital Ships: And thus it begins! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Great move. These changes will require capital and supercapital pilots to think, anticipate and adapt if they want to succeed, so I can understand why the usual suspects are shrieking and wailing about how the sky is falling.
- by Scatim Helicon - at 2015.10.25 13:00:01
|
11. Sticky:Dev blog: EVE Online Roadmap Update (Winter 2015-Spring 2016) - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
MeBiatch wrote: falloff for RR?!?!?!?! hell yes... finally 80km logi will be no more... here is hoping for 60km optimal 20km falloff.. I'd rather see 20km optimal, 60km falloff.
- by Scatim Helicon - at 2015.10.02 23:04:30
|
12. Sticky:Dev blog: Citadels, sieges and you v2 - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Glad to see (tacit) acknowledgement that the Entosis Link in it's present form has failed, and I look forward to something more like this applied to the existing sovereignty mechanics. There probably is a place for Entosis in the game but not as a...
- by Scatim Helicon - at 2015.09.17 22:17:00
|
13. Sticky:Dev Blog: Next set of Sov and Capital Movement Iterations - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Bronson Hughes wrote: I'm generally not a fan of arbitrary limits and special rules, but in the case of the "no entosis 'Ceptors" change it makes sense. They wanted to limit entosis 'Ceptors, not all entosis frigates, and this is pretty much th...
- by Scatim Helicon - at 2015.09.16 17:05:41
|
14. Sticky:Dev Blog: Next set of Sov and Capital Movement Iterations - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Orca Platypus wrote: And now sov warfare is officially over and sov rolling starts. Go to hell CCP with your rubber spine. You just had to go and cave in to gewn tears, didn't you? So usually, so habitually, so despite any sensible opinion. T...
- by Scatim Helicon - at 2015.09.15 18:41:54
|
15. Sticky:Dev Blog: Next set of Sov and Capital Movement Iterations - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Querns wrote: 159Pinky wrote: Casandra Elise McIntire wrote: Ravcharas wrote: 159Pinky wrote: So, now that all gates will be bubbled to **** to prevent entosis. When will you start add a limited timer for bubbles to be in space? SO ...
- by Scatim Helicon - at 2015.09.12 13:57:07
|
16. Sticky:Dev Blog: Next set of Sov and Capital Movement Iterations - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
159Pinky wrote: So, now that all gates will be bubbled to **** to prevent entosis. When will you start add a limited timer for bubbles to be in space? SO ppl at least have to put an effort in to keeping their entrances bubbled The "timer" on...
- by Scatim Helicon - at 2015.09.11 20:26:13
|
17. Sticky:Dev Blog: Next set of Sov and Capital Movement Iterations - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Evelgrivion wrote: You guys realize that the entire reason Interceptors came to dominate the Entosis meta was their combination of survivability and expandability, right? They would never have enjoyed the level of popularity they achieved if fi...
- by Scatim Helicon - at 2015.09.11 20:14:59
|
18. Sticky:Dev Blog: Next set of Sov and Capital Movement Iterations - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Also, can I ask why you've gone with an outright entosis ban for interceptors rather than adjusting the associated requirements/drawbacks/etc to make the choice suboptimal?
- by Scatim Helicon - at 2015.09.11 20:02:46
|
19. Sticky:Dev Blog: Next set of Sov and Capital Movement Iterations - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Quote: This change is designed to reduce the damage that a character can inflict by overjumping, reducing the maximum possible fatigue from 30 days to 5 days. Just to clarify, its only the maximum possible jump fatigue ceiling that is being...
- by Scatim Helicon - at 2015.09.11 19:55:33
|
20. Sticky:Dev blog: Citadels, sieges and you - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Why are wormholes getting reduced vulnerability windows compared to unbonused 0.0? Reminder that NPC 0.0 in particular cannot reduce this window by their activities. Is it your intention that living in a C6 wormhole is safer than living in Syndic...
- by Scatim Helicon - at 2015.08.13 16:25:22
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |