Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
81. I'm going to WoW. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Sheriff Jones Seriously, i am, i'm going to play WoW again, BUT...here comes the shocker...i'm gonna keep playing EVE too Both have own good qualities and both are really good games. Swords+magic and space+pewpew. With bo...
- by Shevar - at 2008.10.01 12:13:00
|
82. This is Jade. This is our elected Spokesperson - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Lady Ghoulia I can't even begin to describe the disappointment in the behaviour of the person I voted for: Originally by: "Jade Constantine" Originally by: "Ephemeral" Originally by: "Kellaen" ...
- by Shevar - at 2008.09.08 12:24:00
|
83. The truth about 0.0 lag (?) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Jenna Shame My account expires soon, the reason I listed was lag. The only difference I can tell between 0.0 lag 3 years ago and now is that before the nodes would crash, now they just get so slow they might as well have cr...
- by Shevar - at 2008.08.31 14:21:00
|
84. Thanks CCP for ruining yet another part of the player experience! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Larkonis Trassler I don't really see this as a community win. It appears that Chribba's dread was moved by some n00b GM on his first day/unaware of the rules. Chribba poasted here meanwhile I'm sure an escalation was pondero...
- by Shevar - at 2008.08.28 15:04:00
|
85. CCP, as a parting gift, let me explain a few things to you. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Glengrant Hm- let's see: 0.0 - still there, still no law unless you enforce it yourself High sec - concord still comes after your ship's been wrecked low sec - still a pirate infested mess carebears fear to go to war decs -...
- by Shevar - at 2008.08.27 14:28:00
|
86. Thanks CCP for ruining yet another part of the player experience! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Devilish Ledoux" First they came for the suicide gankers and I didn't speak up because I didn't suicide gank Then they came for the Veldnaught and I didn't speak up because I didn't have a Veldnaught. Then they came for ...
- by Shevar - at 2008.08.27 10:01:00
|
87. GB2WOW? I might. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Terianna Eri Come to think of it, I still have an active City of Villains subscription I share with my friends. Haven't picked that up in a while since it's a pile of ridiculously poor design, but at least the players can't ...
- by Shevar - at 2008.08.27 08:49:00
|
88. Thanks CCP for ruining yet another part of the player experience! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Arte Edited by: Arte on 27/08/2008 07:02:04 Originally by: Akita T Latest in a long line of STUPIDÖ choices CCP made recently. Fixed that for you.. But aye, seems it's habit forming at the moment Unfor...
- by Shevar - at 2008.08.27 07:37:00
|
89. Who wants to see eve on X-PLAY - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Saietor Blackgreen what is x-play? From wikipedia; X-Play (previously GameSpot TV and Extended Play) is a TV program about video games, known for its reviews and comedy skits. The program airs on G4 in the United States,...
- by Shevar - at 2008.08.25 07:37:00
|
90. New expansions or more work on lag? a vote? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Banana Torres Yep, but they could sack those without the required skills and use the money saved to employ those with the required skills. Personally I think this would be a bad move, I am just pointing out the flaw in you...
- by Shevar - at 2008.08.22 10:29:00
|
91. is 15% tax reasonable for a high sec mission running corp? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: 666 666 the corp i am in with one of my characters just went from 5% to 15% and i personally am thinking this is a bit high for a corp that is basically mission running. One day we might go in low sec or 0.0 but that wont be...
- by Shevar - at 2008.08.20 15:11:00
|
92. Victims of Their Own Success - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Somealt Ofmine The number of threads devoted to varying schemes to get people to leave high-sec and go to low-sec is amazing. Carebears whining about safety in high sec got what they wanted due to whining. So why not eb...
- by Shevar - at 2008.08.20 10:18:00
|
93. is a cloaked ship immune from a DD? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Solid Trust it was a cloaked recon and it might of been that he was too far away. i didn't ask his distance from the DD. I'm sure you can set up a minmatar recon to tank a amarr dd and an amarr recon to tank a minmatar dd.
- by Shevar - at 2008.08.20 07:48:00
|
94. Did CCP forget to pay Gamespot.com ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Ronja We all know that Gamespot is a sell-out company that boost game rankings depending on it's existing contracts with game developers/distributors. That said, I've looked up eve-online and the following came up: Game Spot...
- by Shevar - at 2008.08.19 21:19:00
|
95. Notice the near complete absence of nano whines (not a nano whine) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: murder one Be they for or against, nano threads have all but disappeared. Indeed, even in the Game Design forum the threads are largely about all the other issues the upcoming patch will introduce (blasters, missiles, recon ...
- by Shevar - at 2008.08.19 09:13:00
|
96. so does CCP not want the high sec players to only do missions? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Tamahra Edited by: Tamahra on 17/08/2008 21:14:11 exploring is borked in high sec, pretty much not worth to do it mining is borked too, not worth to do it compared to missions what else is there besides missions? not mu...
- by Shevar - at 2008.08.17 21:20:00
|
97. Warning for Impersonation!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Kazuo Ishiguro The GM decision is the correct one, and there's plenty of precedent for it - in particular, with people trying to impersonate EBANK or BIG Lottery staff. In that case the rules should be adjusted since the...
- by Shevar - at 2008.08.14 13:37:00
|
98. Warning for Impersonation!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: EVECitizen19821743 I spent quite a lot of time carefully reading the EULA before I carried out this operation. The idea was that I would setup a fake mothership sale and use an ALT similar to CHRIBBA to steal the buyers mon...
- by Shevar - at 2008.08.14 13:35:00
|
99. Fantastic player starts. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Kano Sekor Fastest way to industrial haulers plx? Amarr with frigate 3 (one of the military lines), just buy the amarr industrial skill and you can use a decent hauler (bestower). --- -The only real drug problem is scor...
- by Shevar - at 2008.08.14 13:23:00
|
100. why they shouldnt move l4 missions to low sec only - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Bytaless Are they gonna make lvl 4 missions low sec only ? That's pure bullshit ! If u want low sec only, make lvl 5 low sec only, that's enough ! Look at the knowledge of an average high sec denizen that never ventures ...
- by Shevar - at 2008.08.14 13:14:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |