Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 |
161. Sticky:New dev blog: Tech is fine l2p - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
lol yeah cause factors like demand for T2, cartelling of other products, towers being destroyed . . . none of that effects the price of tech right?
- by Sigras - at 2012.07.27 21:06:00
|
162. Sticky:New dev blog: Tech is fine l2p - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
I love how everyone is talking about the sudden drop in isotope prices because of "ungankable mining barges" (which btw are all worse at mining ice than the mackinaw currently is) and nobody is taking into consideration the additional PI costs tha...
- by Sigras - at 2012.07.27 07:14:00
|
163. Sticky:New dev blog: Tech is fine l2p - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Promiscuous Female wrote: with isotopes at 600 (which is a very conservatively high number) tech will be at 40k within a month Cry me a river, now you only make 2.5 billion isk a month times 100 OTECH moons WAH WAH WAH!
- by Sigras - at 2012.07.27 06:48:00
|
164. Sticky:New dev blog: Tech is fine l2p - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
you guys are talking about this like they removed moons from the game or something. Even if the worst case scenario happens and your worst projections come true you realize that a technetium moon will still be worth around 2.5 billion isk a month ...
- by Sigras - at 2012.07.26 17:28:00
|
165. Sticky:New dev blog: Tech is fine l2p - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
well, if what the others claim is true and that we have so much cobalt that its coming out of our ears, (which i have found to be true myself, as i have witnessed dozens of unused R8 moons), then it wont effect the price at all. If the other asse...
- by Sigras - at 2012.07.25 07:02:00
|
166. Sticky:New dev blog: Tech is fine l2p - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Promiscuous Female wrote: solar and xdeath was sparked by tech drama in geminate CFC smackdown of d/q/pb was to neuter a growing coalition of shirtlords who had recently been in the north aiding raidendot in their abortive attempts at stealing...
- by Sigras - at 2012.07.25 03:03:00
|
167. Sticky:New dev blog: Tech is fine l2p - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Promiscuous Female wrote: Sigras wrote: Promiscuous Female wrote: not to mention the removal of the only conflict driver in 0.0 yeah because XDeath got wiped out so Solar could profit from all their tech moons And Im sure all that Te...
- by Sigras - at 2012.07.25 02:41:00
|
168. Sticky:New dev blog: Tech is fine l2p - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Promiscuous Female wrote: not to mention the removal of the only conflict driver in 0.0 yeah because XDeath got wiped out so Solar could profit from all their tech moons And Im sure all that Tech in Delve is really what motivated TEST to i...
- by Sigras - at 2012.07.25 01:40:00
|
169. Sticky:New dev blog: Tech is fine l2p - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Wibla wrote: Dramaticus wrote: When do we start discussing the complete T2 overhaul? You know, the only way to fix this that doesn't result in all moon minerals being worth fuel cost. About 3 months too late to make a difference, seeing a...
- by Sigras - at 2012.07.24 22:29:00
|
170. Sticky:New dev blog: Tech is fine l2p - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
lol whats wrong with it? what did you want them to do? or did you not have a better idea and you just wanted to whine and complain?
- by Sigras - at 2012.07.24 16:49:00
|
171. Sticky:New dev blog: Tech is fine l2p - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
you have to count the opportunity cost of the cobalt that you'd be mining from the moon Assuming that the current prices hold true, and that the POS holders are happy with 100 mil profit a month, the new resting price of PT should be around 39,00...
- by Sigras - at 2012.07.24 16:47:00
|
172. Sticky:New dev blog: Tech is fine l2p - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
I think everyone who is touting moon depletion/moon shifting is forgetting 2 things: #1. How much of a pain it is to scan moons - For a large alliance, they may control thousands of moons, even if the moon materials only ever respawned at downt...
- by Sigras - at 2012.07.23 16:12:00
|
173. Sticky:New dev blog: Tech is fine l2p - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Akita T wrote: steave435 wrote: stuff True, it's possible. Let's say you want to get the absolute LOWEST value technetium is likely to settle down at. So, let's downvalue cobalt back down to previous negligible levels of 500 ISK and assu...
- by Sigras - at 2012.07.23 03:45:00
|
174. Sticky:New dev blog: Changes to War Mechanics - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Argus Sorn wrote: Those small groups causing larger groups headaches are a vital part of eve. Nothing needs to be done to hinder them, they are a large part of the sandbox. If a 5 man corp wants to dec a 3000 man alliance, then more power to th...
- by Sigras - at 2012.04.21 03:02:00
|
175. Sticky:New dev blog: Changes to War Mechanics - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
I posted this in another thread, and im sorry if this has come up already, but I would rather have an additional cost for the difference in size between the two entities, so it works both ways. This way large alliances can dec large alliances, but...
- by Sigras - at 2012.04.20 15:51:00
|
176. Sticky:New Dev Blog: Carebearing 2.0 - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
does this mean that the drones will drop no loot at all? Do the drones then give more isk then other pirates to make up for the lack of faction spawns and meta 4 drops?
- by Sigras - at 2012.04.10 16:26:00
|
177. Sticky:New dev blog: Price Indices GÇô February 2012 - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
I would reserve judgement on how the drone regions gaining bounties is going to effect inflation until after the titan nerf goes through. I have a feeling that these two things may cancel each other out as I have seen many a titan make >200 m...
- by Sigras - at 2012.03.19 18:24:00
|
178. Sticky:New dev blog: Price Indices GÇô February 2012 - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Lilliana Stelles wrote: Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't see why CCP would need to intervene with inflation. It's not something new; the charts clearly show that the entire market has been inflating since day one. Eventually, those...
- by Sigras - at 2012.03.19 06:48:00
|
179. Sticky:New dev blog: Rebalancing EVE, one ship at a time - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
^^ this is the first legitimate problem I have heard with the plan to just give everyone the SP for the additional skills; however, this should not be a problem if they give you 1+ week of lead time which should be enough for even the deepest WH c...
- by Sigras - at 2012.03.13 17:12:00
|
180. Sticky:New dev blog: Rebalancing EVE, one ship at a time - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
If they raised the rank of advanced spaceship command to 11 would it stop all of your whining?
- by Sigras - at 2012.03.13 08:09:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |