| Pages: [1] 2 |
1. Why the 5 man team rule is fail, and why most of Eve will never notice - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Personally, I like the idea of the 5 man rounds, though I do wish they were being televised . . . but aside from my personal feelings, your numbers are wrong AT8 Round 1, 64 teams competing 32 matches Round 2, 64 teams competing 32 matches Ro...
- by Sigras - at 2011.04.29 09:21:00
|
2. Helpful list of stuff CCP should sort out / clarify; - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Admiral Goberius Originally by: CCP Zirnitra I will get the rules clarified a bit. To quickly answer: 2. There are no minimum limits for the pre-qualifiers, but keep in mind that you need wins, not draws to proceed ...
- by Sigras - at 2011.04.20 04:37:00
|
3. Boosters Banning Logic? - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
I believe it was said by one of the devs during AT7 that they didnt include boosters because they wanted the tourney to be as much about pilot skill as possible, and boosters are, by definition, random in their penalties. I know that jammers are ...
- by Sigras - at 2011.04.13 10:06:00
|
4. Minimum Points In Pre-Qualifiers - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
ok, good to know it wasnt just something simple that I missed . . . But I would like to see this because I would really dislike seeing a group of 5 dramiels flying around the arena trolling everyone . . .
- by Sigras - at 2011.04.12 10:46:00
|
5. Minimum Points In Pre-Qualifiers - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Is there a minimum number of points teams are allowed to use in the pre-qualifiers? I know that the minimum in the normal tourney is 50 but is there a minimum in the pre-qualifiers?
- by Sigras - at 2011.04.11 18:00:00
|
6. Cloaking Patition!!!! - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
im fairly certain that he meant in the alliance tournament, but this is still a terrible idea as black ops ships would be so OP as to be unspeakable.
- by Sigras - at 2011.03.30 18:53:00
|
7. Cruiser Tourney - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
thx, though google translate doesnt seem to want to . . .
- by Sigras - at 2009.09.29 23:25:00
|
8. Cruiser Tourney - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
as i dont speak Russian, i would like some more info on this as i participated last time and it was really fun . . . more info plez?
- by Sigras - at 2009.09.29 02:58:00
|
9. Alliance Tournament VI: Official Rules Thread - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Can we get a clarification on what "pirate implants" are? I mean only pirate implant sets? or do things like Michi's Excavation Augmentor count too???
- by Sigras - at 2008.12.06 12:53:00
|
10. Alliance Tournament VI: Official Rules Thread - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Random Womble Mindstar i think its you that failed to read what he quoted which stated allowing RR _only_ on logistics and not allowing them to be fitted on any other ships eg the BSs you mentioned. I know claw replied to ...
- by Sigras - at 2008.12.04 00:32:00
|
11. Alliance Tournament VI: Official Rules Thread - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: North River 1. The PVP Nature of the competion[SIC] excludes a number of other game players (industrialists, miners etc) not just logistics pilots it isnt a complaint of who's getting excluded but the number of tactics t...
- by Sigras - at 2008.12.03 14:41:00
|
12. Alliance Tournament VI: Official Rules Thread - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: CCP Claw I'd like to weigh in on this too, but firstly I'd like to point out that you're wasting your time complaining about remote reps being removed as they will not be added back in for these rules. cries Origina...
- by Sigras - at 2008.12.02 14:04:00
|
13. Soooo...... - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
i think theyre bringing it back . . .
- by Sigras - at 2008.12.02 05:44:00
|
14. Alliance Tournament VI: Official Rules Thread - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
well i believe they said they want to reduce the random chance that can win you the match . . . thats why boosters arent allowed . . . and i found one more thing having no logistics ruins . . . ECM no ewar boat is going to survive a second in this...
- by Sigras - at 2008.12.02 05:27:00
|
15. Alliance Tournament VI: Official Rules Thread - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: CCP Mindstar I actually agree with most of what you are saying here. It is true that people always aim for survivability, that gank setups are a bit uncommon in tournaments thus far. In the past couple of tourneys, this has ...
- by Sigras - at 2008.12.01 23:25:00
|
16. Alliance Tournament VI: Official Rules Thread - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: CCP Claw Because being repped by a logistics helps frigates survive a lot better when under the guns of 5 battleships, right? :) Logistics is still a perfectly viable tactic...it's just not *the* tactic anymore. Linkag...
- by Sigras - at 2008.11.30 22:23:00
|
17. Alliance Tournament VI: Official Rules Thread - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Pistonbroke Yes, of course you cant fit a dual rep setup on a Guardian, or a large Booster II on a basilisk. And no, of course they don't have enough cap recharge to support running such a tank.. 1. this still doesnt...
- by Sigras - at 2008.11.30 13:55:00
|
18. Alliance Tournament VI: Official Rules Thread - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: CCP Mindstar I think its worth noting that Logistics as a tactic is by no means banned. It is still quite possible to repair each other. The only thing banned here are remote repair modules LOL 9 Ishtars with Heavy ...
- by Sigras - at 2008.11.30 12:23:00
|
19. Alliance Tournament VI: Official Rules Thread - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: CCP Claw Look at this thread... "9 Drakes will be OP" "9 Ishtars will be OP" "ECM will be everywhere" "Marauders are too OP for their points" I think its pretty clear that there are a lot of possible setups going on her...
- by Sigras - at 2008.11.29 22:10:00
|
20. Alliance Tournament VI: Official Rules Thread - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Vasili Z You're right dood, that fight Tri had against Ev0ke was really boring. I would much rather see people get jammed and die slowly. That's what pvp is all about now anyways amirite? no not at all; but if you elimin...
- by Sigras - at 2008.11.29 09:18:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |