Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
41. Motherships and remote ECM burst - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Amy Wang You are obviously confusing carriers with motherships here. Motherships have absolutely no problem of being frontlined, in fact they are quite frequently frontlined, sometimes even without support fleet. In case y...
- by Skeltek - at 2007.08.27 11:52:00
|
42. Question about skills and lock-on - in Skill Discussions [original thread]
I recently tried out putting a Auto Targeting system II on my Rook to raise the shipŠs ability to lock targets to above 10. My ship could lock 10+2=12 targets. My targeting lvl5 and multitasking lvl4 allow me to lock 2+5+4=11 targets. Even thoug...
- by Skeltek - at 2007.08.08 14:12:00
|
43. Untrustworthy Duo - Karstengitte & Dresden Karno - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
I wouldnŠt overreact in that matter. You should understand that for some people that amount of money may still be much. Even though it was wrong to make this public before trying harder, people sometimes act wrong if the involved stuff meant much ...
- by Skeltek - at 2007.08.05 17:09:00
|
44. The New Logistics Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
The overall benefit of a ship is not a scalar value. The BasiliskŠs 6 highslots are perfectly fine, imho it doesnŠt need a lowslot like stated either. True, it is not possible to keep everything running all the time with any reasonable setup, but ...
- by Skeltek - at 2007.08.04 21:32:00
|
45. Untrustworthy Duo - Karstengitte & Dresden Karno - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
to be honest, two missing Covetors are nothing in comparison to the time other people spend on AllianceOps. That is imho a ridiculously small price to not spending the time the others usualy spend on fleetops. Next time you donŠt want to particip...
- by Skeltek - at 2007.08.04 15:23:00
|
46. WTS 2x 50 Day GTC 230 million isk. Secure method only (Online Now) - in Timecode Bazaar [original thread]
worked fine and suprisingly(!) quick. (He was so kind to explain it to me for half an hour when I just couldnŠt find the purchase button = D ) thanks for the trade there, Skeltek
- by Skeltek - at 2007.07.11 23:01:00
|
47. The recent ECM Nerf, a cut too deep? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: LUKEC Hey we never bothered to make scorps primary in fleets. Reasons are obvious: 1. cheap 2. lots of hp 3. they don't kill you 4. they don't force you to warp out 5. pilots are nubs & suck 6. do you really have time to c...
- by Skeltek - at 2007.03.05 19:30:00
|
48. The recent ECM Nerf, a cut too deep? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Goumindong Originally by: Elrich Zann No the "not" was left in for a reason. You refuse to believe people when they tell you that the ship is hardly used anymore. You can quote numbers all you want. The facts on TQ d...
- by Skeltek - at 2007.03.05 15:35:00
|
49. Possible Basilisk Fix (they want to promote support ships, right?) - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
In Gamedevelopment, there are usualy thousands of possibilities to solve one particular problem. The difficulty here is to distinguish which 100 of the 1000 initial possibilities are actually good. 10 of those are probably compatible with whatever...
- by Skeltek - at 2007.03.04 11:44:00
|
50. T2 bpos.. no more? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Just donŠt worry. I played EVE since early beta and since Tranquility started, I was always trying to grow up a technology/research corp, doing industry and researchmissions for dozens of months. Still never seen any BPO nor anything else. Yes, ev...
- by Skeltek - at 2007.03.01 16:30:00
|
51. The recent ECM Nerf, a cut too deep? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: LUKEC Originally by: welsh wizard ...stuff that I mostly agree... BUT: Backups were dice standard(and ATUK). Let's be honest, fleets of alliances with less sp heavy players are (or at least used to be) jammer h...
- by Skeltek - at 2007.03.01 14:02:00
|
52. The recent ECM Nerf, a cut too deep? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Aramendel WTB weapon which enables a single BS to destroy a rook with an 1600mm plate at 100k instantly without it being able to warp out. Hey, lets be generous, instead instantly lets say within 10 seconds. ok, then fi...
- by Skeltek - at 2007.02.28 15:32:00
|
53. Tactical Shield Manipulation - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
this topic was brought up by me a year ago or so. It was discussed. but no official statement was made. Some believe that the armordamage is in addition to the shields taking damage. So if you receive 200 damage that leaks through shields, your s...
- by Skeltek - at 2007.02.28 14:26:00
|
54. The recent ECM Nerf, a cut too deep? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: LUKEC Originally by: Veryez Originally by: welsh wizard It was almost perfect for a very short time (About 3 weeks?) pre-Kali when ECCM was buffed. Now they've just removed said module from the game again....
- by Skeltek - at 2007.02.28 13:56:00
|
55. The recent ECM Nerf, a cut too deep? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Aramendel Edited by: Aramendel on 27/02/2007 18:33:56 Originally by: Skeltek The range is aproximately that at which a FleetBS can shoot anyway. Except for gatecamps there is usualy no opportunity to use it above...
- by Skeltek - at 2007.02.28 13:44:00
|
56. The recent ECM Nerf, a cut too deep? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
ECM platforms can be totaly ignored. We usualy only shoot them because they explode with a single or two voleys and it is much ISK-damage done to the enemy without much effort. The only reason a Rook might be considered a valid choice is that the ...
- by Skeltek - at 2007.02.27 17:37:00
|
57. The recent ECM Nerf, a cut too deep? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Aramendel And we attacked part of a russian gang farming an 10/10 plex in our territory. We outnumbered them 5 to 3. We suffered no losses, but neither did they because their single rook managed to jam our ships so we couldn...
- by Skeltek - at 2007.02.25 14:05:00
|
58. gang mod shield harmonisation - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Larkonis Trassler I thought the squad commander didn't get 'his' bonuses. The Commanders of a fleet only forward bonuses from up the chain down to their members. They forward bonuses and give their own bonuses to anyone ...
- by Skeltek - at 2007.02.25 13:56:00
|
59. The recent ECM Nerf, a cut too deep? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Gatecamping 180km+ from gate is not really considered PvP imho, so I canŠt really believe range to be a very big argument in this matter. Oh, I found an old post from mine in our forum. Me and a few others from our alliance were doing a 10/10 com...
- by Skeltek - at 2007.02.25 13:26:00
|
60. The recent ECM Nerf, a cut too deep? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: Skeltek on 25/02/2007 12:34:33 long time since I saw ECMs in Fleetfights... Well, the base strenght was lowered by 50%. The increase of jamming strenght on ECM specialized ships can only be compensated by a fraction, by using ECM-m...
- by Skeltek - at 2007.02.25 12:35:00
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |