Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
41. Collective petition about fozziesov - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Gallowmere Rorschach wrote: Kaarous Aldurald wrote: If I personally had to make a suggestion on the matter, I would suggest that CCP (after announcing well beforehand) delete any and all blueprints for them. No more new ones, the existing o...
- by Snowmann - at 2015.08.12 08:06:05
|
42. Share your experiences with Fozziesov! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Akballah Kassan wrote: Lucas Kell wrote: Clearly the community does agree with me. 50% of all anti Fozziesov posts seem to be from you alone. Take your squealing away and I'd say more people are in favour then against. This may be ...
- by Snowmann - at 2015.08.12 07:44:59
|
43. Share your experiences with Fozziesov! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: Snowmann wrote: No one would do anything in this game without a purpose. There is always a reason. You may not see it or agree with it but there is one. Strategic victory may not even be in anyone's mind when they are atta...
- by Snowmann - at 2015.08.09 21:16:02
|
44. Share your experiences with Fozziesov! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: Snowmann wrote: Only stupid players would engage a significantly superior force in symmetric warfare when asymmetric means are available. Yes, you are being engaged asymmetrically. First off, forming a coalitions yoursel...
- by Snowmann - at 2015.08.09 17:08:55
|
45. Share your experiences with Fozziesov! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: Salvos Rhoska wrote: Lucas Kell: If as you say, you are losing population and interest to boredom, how about this: Start a proper war. Even better, start several. Set the whole goddam universe on fire. Why don't you star...
- by Snowmann - at 2015.08.09 05:32:04
|
46. Share your experiences with Fozziesov! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Icycle wrote: I think its disgracefull to complain about boredom and that fozzysov is boring when they are clearly not doing nothing them selves to spice it up. You have massive blob of blues and they wont deploy. CFC fault, not the rest of eve...
- by Snowmann - at 2015.08.08 16:27:09
|
47. Collective petition about fozziesov - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: Snowmann wrote: -I suggest we get rid of all current Supers and Titans. -Give owners some very high percentage of estimated build costs. Goodbye economy. Yeah, that could create some high inflationary pressures. Anot...
- by Snowmann - at 2015.08.08 15:56:10
|
48. Polorized weapons. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
George Gouillot wrote: Daerrol wrote: ... Thrasher ... Heat Sink ... Heh, unfortunately a common mistake even with Vets. Seen a few contracts out there with the wrong damage mod, from old players.
- by Snowmann - at 2015.08.08 15:13:48
|
49. Polorized weapons. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Some of them have very good uses.
- by Snowmann - at 2015.08.08 03:15:20
|
50. Collective petition about fozziesov - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
This is starting to remind me of when I reach the top of the tech tree in some SIM or the get the best gear in some RPG. It gets harder and harder to find the game fun. Kind of like in Eve once your Alliance has all the best gear. After awhile y...
- by Snowmann - at 2015.08.07 20:45:52
|
51. Share your experiences with Fozziesov! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Akballah Kassan wrote: So what things can Pro Fozzie vs No Fozzie sides agree upon? 1) More of an isk loss for attackers (and maybe defenders) who flee the field - we vary wildly on how much isk loss and how it should be lost but the principl...
- by Snowmann - at 2015.08.06 22:28:44
|
52. Share your experiences with Fozziesov! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jenn aSide wrote: Panthe3 Black wrote: It's FW without LP Exactly, and I'm not just saying that because of your excellent choice of corp/alliance The blind defenders of Fozzie simply refuse to understand what the dislike is about, they...
- by Snowmann - at 2015.08.06 21:56:29
|
53. Share your experiences with Fozziesov! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: Snowmann wrote: I don't agree with the premise that someone should desire to take Sov in order to be able to disrupt someone else's Sov. The multiple simultaneous entosis links is interesting, if it is tied to defense inde...
- by Snowmann - at 2015.08.06 21:35:22
|
54. Share your experiences with Fozziesov! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: Salvos Rhoska wrote: Lucas Kell wrote: Salvos Rhoska wrote: I for one, and still hoping for someone to post itemized and numbered list of suggestions, especially as supported by experience with sov change. There's so...
- by Snowmann - at 2015.08.06 20:59:42
|
55. Share your experiences with Fozziesov! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: Snowmann wrote: I would suggest that Trollcepting is emergent game play as well. Spin it how you want, both involve being forced into gameplay that you don't want, and each have their "said" purposes. The merits of those ...
- by Snowmann - at 2015.08.06 19:30:16
|
56. Share your experiences with Fozziesov! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: Snowmann wrote: Lucas Kell wrote: Snowmann wrote: What you are talking about is asymmetrical, or guerrilla warfare. Attacking and not holding is the point of that type of warfare. No, it's not. Guerilla warfare still...
- by Snowmann - at 2015.08.06 19:05:30
|
57. Share your experiences with Fozziesov! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jenn aSide wrote: So when you see (and you will) that this system create even more sov sprawl (because now renters can harden their own systems with pve) like Dominion did, will you come back to this forum and admit you were wrong? If they ...
- by Snowmann - at 2015.08.06 18:59:39
|
58. Share your experiences with Fozziesov! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: Snowmann wrote: What you are talking about is asymmetrical, or guerrilla warfare. Attacking and not holding is the point of that type of warfare. No, it's not. Guerilla warfare still has a strategic goal. Trollceptors don'...
- by Snowmann - at 2015.08.06 18:38:59
|
59. Share your experiences with Fozziesov! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: Snowmann wrote: I agree that this new form of Sov introduced a new form a Sov warfare that the Super Cap heavy organizations are having issues countering. They want to force direct actions that they can escalate and return ...
- by Snowmann - at 2015.08.06 18:09:24
|
60. Share your experiences with Fozziesov! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Kit Bradovich wrote: This thread is interesting Lol I believe the new game mechanics (fozzie) Lol has created some content and pvp for smaller alliances/corps to take systems on the outskirts of sov holders, but has created the turtle affect i...
- by Snowmann - at 2015.08.06 16:34:16
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |