Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
61. Feed back on change - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lt Mando wrote: But if I asked 10 null CEO what they thought of fozzy sov would I then get ten different answers ? Depends who you asked about Aegis Sov. Don't forget that the harder it is for someone to participate in Sov warfare, the ea...
- by Snowmann - at 2015.08.06 04:37:34
|
62. Feed back on change - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Changes are rarely universally liked. Game design that caters to forum whims would lead to chaos. Ask 10 Eve players what they want and you will get 11 different opinions.
- by Snowmann - at 2015.08.06 04:30:17
|
63. Share your experiences with Fozziesov! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Grouchy Smurf wrote: Antylus Tyrell wrote: Goons, you really should have shed more systems than you did. You should have pulled back to Deklein and let other people move into the areas around you. But they are not trying to capture th...
- by Snowmann - at 2015.08.05 17:16:37
|
64. Collective petition about fozziesov - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
It seems this has become Eve's version of Asymmetric warfare, where the defender would prefer symmetric warfare. The fact that it is so annoying to major Sov holders, is the point. , they have to address it. Its a kind of balance to Sov Sprawl. ...
- by Snowmann - at 2015.08.04 20:01:58
|
65. Collective petition about fozziesov - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
So it seems some organizations are having issues realizing what "occupancy" based sov really means. Hint: If you are finding it too hard to defend your currently claimed systems, you should consider recalculating what systems you want to hold. ...
- by Snowmann - at 2015.08.03 21:06:41
|
66. Share your experiences with Fozziesov! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I hope the following things will be taken into account: No rules based system will ever have 100% acceptance. Organizations trying to hold too much space will always have grievances with the difficulty of the current system. Capital Ships shoul...
- by Snowmann - at 2015.07.31 17:41:17
|
67. No 50k sp? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Of two accounts it looks like one got the 50k extra SP and one didn't.
- by Snowmann - at 2015.07.21 19:16:43
|
68. Sticky:Dev blog: If you are reading this and NOT a CCP Dev... - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
I will gladly accept anyone's snowballs that they don't want.
- by Snowmann - at 2012.12.13 15:23:00
|
69. podding someone i have killrights on - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Thanks for the thorough follow up.
- by Snowmann - at 2011.02.01 00:08:00
|
70. CCP: Proof that you NEED to train your own employees better re. EVE - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Bumblefck Countering one's arguments or assertions with counterpoints is one thing. I would suggest calling people on the street(and I quote)... Sorry, I got a bit carried away, but No One calls me "buttercup" and get...
- by Snowmann - at 2011.01.31 21:27:00
|
71. CCP: Proof that you NEED to train your own employees better re. EVE - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Bumblefck It's fitting that I have been posting with civility and restraint, while you and your bridge-dwelling friends have not. I realize the meaning of "troll" has changed over time, but some on these forums need to b...
- by Snowmann - at 2011.01.31 21:04:00
|
72. CCP: Proof that you NEED to train your own employees better re. EVE - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Bumblefck I have just realised, actually, that posters like you in this thread are acting like some hilariously off-beam white bloods cells, streaming out of CCP's lymph nodes t osave the body politic No, we just call it...
- by Snowmann - at 2011.01.31 20:47:00
|
73. CCP: Proof that you NEED to train your own employees better re. EVE - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Bumblefck Don't get upset buttercup. And, for your information, horses whinny, people are whiny Well, I thought it would be fitting for a jack***.
- by Snowmann - at 2011.01.31 20:41:00
|
74. CCP: Proof that you NEED to train your own employees better re. EVE - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Bumblefck Well, I'm sorry if having standards of consistency and expectations of knowledge from a company I give money to makes me a ****. I guess it would be hard not to be on the forums what you seem to be IRL, so I wi...
- by Snowmann - at 2011.01.31 20:15:00
|
75. Ban Request - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
CCP enforcing their rules on test in not so different from some 3rd-world countries enforcing their traffic laws. They should change it from Sisi "rules" to Sisi "guidelines" to clear the confusion. And I do like the multiple system idea better....
- by Snowmann - at 2011.01.31 19:44:00
|
76. CCP: Proof that you NEED to train your own employees better re. EVE - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
No one likes a "know-it-all" so one must expect mistakes from time to time, even from mister/misses perfect. Even worse, no one likes someone who expects more from others than they would expect from themself. They find themselves all alone, wit...
- by Snowmann - at 2011.01.31 19:20:00
|
77. CCP: Proof that you NEED to train your own employees better re. EVE - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Bumblefck But it was still inaccurate. That's the whole point. Don't you think there's something amiss when players have to rush to correct a compan's representative on their own product? No, it's called being human. Get...
- by Snowmann - at 2011.01.31 19:05:00
|
78. Hulkageddon - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Alotta Baggage /me takes down Mavnas' name for some pre Hulkageddon fun Which is why all smart players use alts on the forums.
- by Snowmann - at 2011.01.31 04:53:00
|
79. Question - SSE2 Help - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Blog
- by Snowmann - at 2011.01.31 01:27:00
|
80. Incursion Rewards Anybody? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Zeeawk So are you saying we have to take back the system 100% or we don't get any rewards? Can someone from CCP comment on this? CCP Comment
- by Snowmann - at 2011.01.26 03:34:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |