Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
1. Little things in Rubicon 1.3 - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Janine Ibanez wrote: Since you're messing around with ways to display player names, I would like to suggest the following: Allow for sorting of Local in a tree view filtered by standings. In scenarios where there are hundreds of pilots in syst...
- by Spurty - at 2014.02.27 17:22:00
|
2. Sticky:Testing ASB adjustments on Duality - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
It's a great module! Should be like the damage control unit though. Strictly one per ship! Please listen to the posters here. They really have their fingers on the pulse. Dual (or more) ASB is just silly.
- by Spurty - at 2012.10.24 16:03:00
|
3. New Character Creator, Incarna use NVidia Physx - CPU vs. GPU FPS? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I've been looking for a reason to dump my AMD card (only a 5850) for another nvidia card. roll on affordable 5xx series Hoppit!
- by Spurty - at 2011.01.01 14:05:00
|
4. Market refrig - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Spurty on 19/10/2010 16:16:28 I am loving the fact you are putting in man hours looking at your own game here. I approve of the current changes to the right click I approve of the re-grouping of each hull, so we drill down a litt...
- by Spurty - at 2010.10.19 16:15:00
|
5. Skill points, testing and the test server. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Yah allocation on sisi to bring accounts current = best use of. New tech Give those that helped 3000 skill points for tq = will net bigger fish with bigger carrot (Hmmm mixing metaphors) Auto move people in help me channel to fd- Simple instruc...
- by Spurty - at 2010.07.14 13:01:00
|
6. Motherships the most useless ship in EvE - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
People that get into CAPS, learn this lesson well and stop crying. You are no longer able to survive the agro timer so if you want to play docking games, expect it to cost you. Originally by: Hurley I WAS NOT QUITTING SoT AND WAS N...
- by Spurty - at 2009.12.06 14:40:00
|
7. Massive Supercarrier nerf intentional? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Spurty on 14/11/2009 05:44:56 Originally by: sdchew PS: If this goes thru, I want an option to reprocess my Mom. All you have to do is dock it and ... oh wait .. oh no nevermind you can one day! CCP need to just remo...
- by Spurty - at 2009.11.14 05:43:00
|
8. Dominion Supercarrier Feedback - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
What is the exact purpose of these ships again? I thought it was to kill sieged dreads, but people are whining about them being useless vs carriers? Sounds a lot like moaning about destroyers dying to hac gangs. i.e. people want to make this shi...
- by Spurty - at 2009.11.13 03:44:00
|
9. CCP, did you adjust chances for Rev Eng on Sisi with last patch? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Science & Industry * Hammerhead and Vespa blueprints of all varieties will now display the correct model. * The Sisters Combat Scanner Probe I and blueprint I, Core Scanner Probe I and blueprint I and Deep Space Scanner Probe I and blueprint I ...
- by Spurty - at 2009.05.11 04:49:00
|
10. Falcon drone bay & DPS - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
This thread came to a halt at comment #4 Arguing after the figures are laid out is moot smoking blowing short sighted waste of effort. Deva 1 / Falcon cry babies 0 Originally by: Infinity Ziona Thus I AM BETTER THAN YOU.
- by Spurty - at 2009.05.11 04:47:00
|
11. ECCM - lowers chance of being scanned out - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I didn't know where to look as the description doesn't mention this bonus (It really should, this is a HUGE reason to fit this module, its actually better than the primary reason). That was why I *argued*, I expected better from you guys, you usu...
- by Spurty - at 2009.05.06 10:23:00
|
12. ECCM - lowers chance of being scanned out - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Trimutius III I should say that me and my friend tested one interesting thing. Rook + Fleet Command Ship + Covert Ops. They are hanging at the same point Rook has ECCM and Projected ECCM and ECCMs itself and projects ECCM on...
- by Spurty - at 2009.05.06 00:48:00
|
13. ECCM - lowers chance of being scanned out - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I won't bother you with the code used, last time I did it got moderated anyway, but its pretty linear in that you 1/2 the chance of being probed with eccm. Using my character to seed: $ ./sigstr.pl Signal Str for unfitted tempest will be 1.50315...
- by Spurty - at 2009.05.06 00:46:00
|
14. ECCM - lowers chance of being scanned out - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Well, here's the (completed) answer in full : The full formula to calculate Signal Strength is: Signal Strength = (Probe Sensor Strength * (1 + Level of Astrometric Triangulation * 0.05) / 100) * (1 û (0.65 ((Target Range / Max Range) ^ 1.5))) ...
- by Spurty - at 2009.05.06 00:14:00
|
15. ECCM - lowers chance of being scanned out - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
my attitude is born of frustration. I believe, the emperor has new cloths with this one. My limited testing attests to it. The proof isn't in the pudding for me .. but I'm not perfectly spec'ed as a prober, hence questioning of this entire 'un...
- by Spurty - at 2009.05.05 23:01:00
|
16. ECCM - lowers chance of being scanned out - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I'll retest again tonight and take print screens so its clear what I see. Originally by: Infinity Ziona Thus I AM BETTER THAN YOU.
- by Spurty - at 2009.05.05 22:40:00
|
17. ECCM - lowers chance of being scanned out - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
well sherlocks, I have done so and saw no difference, hence the need for clarification. When I see the math presented, I can see what the reduction value is and see just how much it helps. Apparently, no it doesn't in my limited testing O...
- by Spurty - at 2009.05.05 22:33:00
|
18. ECCM - lowers chance of being scanned out - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
The attributes page, says nothing at all (Zilch) about whatever it is you are talking about, only that your strength goes up when this module is turned on. I can't accept what is so far, only opinions. All I do is I demand facts :0 Get the facts...
- by Spurty - at 2009.05.05 22:04:00
|
19. ECCM - lowers chance of being scanned out - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Esmenet Originally by: Spurty How did ANYONE figure out this side affect ? I cant find it now but in the old scanning guide there was a formula for calculating your ships signal strength. And its sig radius di...
- by Spurty - at 2009.05.05 15:40:00
|
20. ECCM - lowers chance of being scanned out - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Bronson Hughes Most stuff in EvE isn't clearly labelled, yet most of us have figured it out anyways. EvE isn't about making things easy for people. Yes, thats 100% true, remember nano-fibres gave all three bonuses (Mas...
- by Spurty - at 2009.05.05 15:04:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |