Pages: [1] 2 3 |
1. HOW DOES THE CONCEPT OF OPTIMAL AND FALLOFF WORK. - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
within optimal = 100% basic chance to hit assuming: A) the target's signature radius is bigger than that of the gun B) the target's transversal velocity is lower than that of the gun. at optimal+falloff, you have a 50% chance to hit. Optimal + f...
- by Stitcher - at 2011.01.12 01:41:00
|
2. what ship are you guys hopeing to use the march update for lego ships? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: Stitcher on 08/01/2009 11:18:07 okay, guys: Watch this video, round about the 35 minute mark no more talk of modifying existing hulls, k? That's not how it's going to work. I'll probably be trying to produce a Caldari gun platfo...
- by Stitcher - at 2009.01.08 11:17:00
|
3. What's u'r opinion about Falcons? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
if people started learning how to use ECCM, they'd quickly see just how fragile the Falcon can be. - Captain Verin "Stitcher" Hakatain.
- by Stitcher - at 2008.12.29 01:41:00
|
4. missiles - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Seriously, what the hell is it with people and assuming that missiles suck? As far as I can tell, they're just another weapon system, and in the hands of a skilled player can hand out the same - and sometimes more - DPS as a set of guns. The down...
- by Stitcher - at 2007.08.29 13:20:00
|
5. Wow the Tier 2 BCs are great! - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Fuujin It's refreshing to see people lsoe a fight and not cry for nerfs. /signed. honour in battle and all that. Yeah, I wants me a Drake, but then, so does every other caldari pilot around. think I'll have to wait a b...
- by Stitcher - at 2006.12.01 22:06:00
|
6. Rigs and drawbacks? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Depends on the rig. astronautics rigs, for example, improve your engines, but degrade your armour HP by 10%. gun rigs improve the gun attribute, but mean the gun needs 10% more energy to fit. The type of penalty is described on the "front page" of...
- by Stitcher - at 2006.12.01 18:36:00
|
7. Caldari vs. Minmatar overall - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
I started caldari because it's easy to get good results out of them early on. more recently, however, the focus of my attention has shifted towards the other races. in particular, I now fly a Minmatar Claw interceptor. Frankly, though, I think I'...
- by Stitcher - at 2006.07.14 11:13:00
|
8. Corvettes? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Auron Shadowbane well for me a corvet should be smaller than a frig (corellian corvette and nebuol-b frigate beeing the reason for this) but then it would just be another "error" if they where not and so a cruiser with BS we...
- by Stitcher - at 2006.07.13 23:21:00
|
9. Corvettes? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: Stitcher on 13/07/2006 23:13:32 double-post ftl ____________________________________________________________ MAY CONTAIN NUTS.
- by Stitcher - at 2006.07.13 23:13:00
|
10. Corvettes? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: Stitcher on 13/07/2006 23:21:52 Edited by: Stitcher on 13/07/2006 23:13:57 Originally by: Leandro Salazar no matter how far the game is set in the future and how ficticious it is, screwing up well established definitions...
- by Stitcher - at 2006.07.13 23:13:00
|
11. Charon vs Obelisk - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Charon has a bigger hold the obelisk is more popular because lots of people fly Iteron Vs, and one of the prerequisites for the obelisk is Gallente Industrial V- also the prerequisite for the itty V. ______________________________________________...
- by Stitcher - at 2006.07.13 17:04:00
|
12. Corvettes? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
My bad about the dreadnought thing. looks like I remembered that documentary wrong. @ Andreask: look, I appreciate that such is your opinion, but if you don't think a little harmless speculation is your thing, you're under absolutely no obligatio...
- by Stitcher - at 2006.07.13 15:36:00
|
13. Corvettes? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
They may be superfluous, but humour me anyway please. You'd think I'd asked for a lightly toasted ferret in a bun, the sort of response this is getting at the moment. For the record, I would consider historical accuracy to be redundant in a space...
- by Stitcher - at 2006.07.13 15:21:00
|
14. Corvettes? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
So suggest something of your own. I said these aren't supposed to be serious suggestions, so much as wild ideas. ____________________________________________________________ MAY CONTAIN NUTS.
- by Stitcher - at 2006.07.13 15:07:00
|
15. Corvettes? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
This is a ship class that I think is really missing from EVE. The Corvette. it's such a cool name, and yet there's no such thing in the game yet. Alas, there's no real niche that I can immediately see where the corvette could fit,so here's where ...
- by Stitcher - at 2006.07.13 14:59:00
|
16. Hawk vs. Harpy - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: Stitcher on 12/07/2006 09:46:01 Harpy = better DPS. Hawk = better tank. That's really all there is to it. If you want pure DPS, get a harpy. On the other hand, if you want a ship that can soak up a disproportionate amount of damag...
- by Stitcher - at 2006.07.12 09:41:00
|
17. Armor tanked Vagabond vs. Shield tanked Vagabond - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
I once saw a vagabond shield tank the combined DPS of a neutron blasterthron, a Harpy and a Moa, all using antimatter chargers. We would have lost the Mega if the Moa hadn't sold itself bravely. The tank on that thing was insanity itself. _____...
- by Stitcher - at 2006.07.10 12:13:00
|
18. Passive tanked raven vs active tanked raven? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Harden passive, boost active, and fire a lot of missiles, that's the rule I go by. ____________________________________________________________ MAY CONTAIN NUTS.
- by Stitcher - at 2006.07.10 12:10:00
|
19. Caracel Caracel Caracel - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Why people keep calling it the caracel, I don't know. It's the same as "Rogue" and "Rouge", I guess. Or "Kestrel" and "Kestral" sometimes, people don't bother to check their spelling is correct. ___________________________________________________...
- by Stitcher - at 2006.07.10 08:20:00
|
20. Hawk set up - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: Stitcher on 10/07/2006 08:11:39 Highs: 4x tech 2 standard launchers, loaded with kinetic missiles. Mids: wild card, passive kinetic and EM hardeners, small shield booster 2. Lows: wild card, wild card. The reason everyone says t...
- by Stitcher - at 2006.07.10 08:11:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |