| Pages: [1] |
1. Faction Warfare and Citadels: Anchoring Discussion - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Oreb Wing wrote: vov It's eve. We like to make people lose things.. Besides. I still think the proliferation of these things is a detriment to FW, in that it introduces a foreign structure that completely ***** on home field advantages. Why sh...
- by Sugar Kyle - at 2015.11.15 18:41:30
|
2. Faction Warfare and Citadels: Bonuses - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
LP taxes to corporations and alliances have been discussed with CCP. Both will require an extensive rework of the lp store and lp distribution system. While that would be lovely, and the current state of the LP store has been extensively discussed...
- by Sugar Kyle - at 2015.11.02 15:24:25
|
3. Faction Warfare and Citadels: Bonuses - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Bienator II wrote: if ccp decides to give structures a FW bonus please make sure that it only applies to structures whose owner is in FW. Last time this could not be done because of legacy code but luckily the structures are all new code now. ...
- by Sugar Kyle - at 2015.11.02 15:20:26
|
4. Faction Warfare and Citadels: Anchoring Discussion - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
May Arethusa wrote: By limiting L and XL citadels, we retain the ability to use mediums and smalls as FOBs for system pushes, and provide corporations and alliances with an official home along with significant benefits for holding onto it. ...
- by Sugar Kyle - at 2015.11.02 15:19:10
|
5. Faction Warfare and Citadels: Anchoring Discussion - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Oreb Wing wrote: Sugar Kyle wrote: Oreb Wing wrote: Have them become the structure hub we have to destroy for occupancy to trade hands. This would limit how many there will be and how central they are, or when they can become vulnerable t...
- by Sugar Kyle - at 2015.11.02 15:17:32
|
6. Faction Warfare and Citadels: Anchoring Discussion - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Oreb Wing wrote: Have them become the structure hub we have to destroy for occupancy to trade hands. This would limit how many there will be and how central they are, or when they can become vulnerable to attack. I did not read anything on wher...
- by Sugar Kyle - at 2015.11.02 05:24:20
|
7. Faction Warfare and Citadels: Bonuses - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Hi again, The structure revamp is well on its way and we are looking to see Citadel enter the game next year. I'd like your thoughts on a few things regarding potential bonuses that could be connected to warzone control. (I am writing a separate...
- by Sugar Kyle - at 2015.11.02 02:14:49
|
8. Faction Warfare and Citadels: Anchoring Discussion - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Hi some more, The structure revamp is well on its way and we are looking to see Citadel enter the game next year. I'd like your thoughts on a few things regarding anchoring and warzone control. (I am writing a separate post to discuss Citadel bo...
- by Sugar Kyle - at 2015.11.02 02:09:14
|
9. Stepping into Faction Warfare - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Thank you for all the thoughts and feedback. Now I get to do the glamorous job of pouring this all into a singular document for CCP. :)
- by Sugar Kyle - at 2015.09.01 16:21:16
|
10. Stepping into Faction Warfare - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Silverbackyererse wrote: Good luck with this mate. And congratulations on getting what I reckon is the first and only sticky I've ever seen in this section of the forums. What do CCP envisage for a FW newbie? Hopefully it's not the quadruple...
- by Sugar Kyle - at 2015.08.22 06:14:09
|
11. Stepping into Faction Warfare - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
IbanezLaney wrote: Most beginners complain to me about not being able to be taxed on their LP. An LP Tax would help them a lot. New players and new entrants to FW come to you and state that their game would be improved if they could ...
- by Sugar Kyle - at 2015.08.21 16:13:43
|
12. Stepping into Faction Warfare - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Hey there. IGÇÖve been tasked with a little fact finding and IGÇÖd love to get some help in this. IGÇÖve been gathering the complaints, hopes, and dreams of members of faction warfare since I was elected and ramped it up a bit since Fanfest. There...
- by Sugar Kyle - at 2015.08.21 14:33:24
|
13. Let carebears be carebears (PVP Opt Out) - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Non consensual PVP is not griefing. Just because you do not like or want it does not mean it is grief. This is a game where everyone can interact with you in positive and negitive ways. It is a game where your choice matters. Because.you chose to ...
- by Sugar Kyle - at 2012.05.14 01:12:00
|
| Pages: [1] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |