Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 |
1. What happened to solo PVP? - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Sarah TheShadow wrote: Andrew Indy wrote: Well its not totally dead, there are a lots of people that Solo. You just have to be very good, pick your targets and have a lot of GTFO ability. That being said, its not CPP that makes Solo hard, ...
- by SurrenderMonkey - at 2016.12.13 18:34:49
|
2. Camp Killing - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Jump in, light a cyno, drop supers. But seriously, there's not really enough information to provide a meaningful answer. Relatively similar numbers and strength? Numbers are easy enough to gauge, but how are you quantifying strength? Need comps...
- by SurrenderMonkey - at 2016.12.09 18:08:30
|
3. Stratios safari - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
The answer is, "You don't."
- by SurrenderMonkey - at 2016.12.07 17:06:28
|
4. Is it possible to win a fight in a Rifter? - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Vex Munda wrote: SurrenderMonkey wrote: The rifter is not great these days, but some of your fits are very bad (meta 0 modules, the occasional empty low slot, etc.), which is definitely not going to help any. The latest fits are all tech2....
- by SurrenderMonkey - at 2016.12.05 19:03:37
|
5. Is it possible to win a fight in a Rifter? - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
The rifter is not great these days, but some of your fits are very bad (meta 0 modules, the occasional empty low slot, etc.), which is definitely not going to help any. See if this helps any: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=de1hwoFYA_k
- by SurrenderMonkey - at 2016.12.05 18:09:27
|
6. terrorizing alphas with velator - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Ivo Ostus wrote: Concerning the impact of clone states... look again. previous to change 9 or 10 persons at a time in the system im settled... now 50-60. And my previous statement stands: Move to grown-ass adult space. Quote: Oh, and ...
- by SurrenderMonkey - at 2016.12.04 17:13:04
|
7. terrorizing alphas with velator - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
I really doubt a couple of extra relatively unskilled ventures have had any real impact on ore availability, tbh. Maybe try moving to grown-ass adult space.
- by SurrenderMonkey - at 2016.12.01 17:02:38
|
8. Anyone in the Slays area looking for an easy war target? - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
There is no possible way this could backfire.
- by SurrenderMonkey - at 2016.11.23 01:48:24
|
9. Another permajammed thread. - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Gully Alex Foyle wrote: Obviously there would be a limit, like <25% strength/sensor nothing happens. Then it depends on how it's balanced. EDIT: you could also have your previous locks come back automatically, without having to re-lock. ...
- by SurrenderMonkey - at 2016.10.21 19:52:39
|
10. Another permajammed thread. - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Gully Alex Foyle wrote: Take away RNG, switch to jam duration. For example, 10-strong jam vs. 20 sensor strength jams for 10s out of the 20s module cycle time. Re-balance ECM strengths across the board to taste, considering that losing all l...
- by SurrenderMonkey - at 2016.10.21 15:22:07
|
11. Tradehub warfare in FW is bullshit. - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Tuevo Forth wrote: Paranoid Loyd wrote: It's quite obvious your insta undock BM is not properly setup. You undock at a random angle. Ignoring it, if it's not too bad, is good enough for everything but an instalocking Loki. The only way ...
- by SurrenderMonkey - at 2016.10.19 16:36:25
|
12. Tradehub warfare in FW is bullshit. - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Tuevo Forth wrote: Alright, I've quit EVE cold twice over this issue, but I haven't bitched about it. So here's the *****. Please follow along to the end. I like FW. It offers casual PVP that's easy to find, with spontaneous cooperation, witho...
- by SurrenderMonkey - at 2016.10.19 15:50:58
|
13. High-sec gaym mechics - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
When is CCP going to stop letting other players do things I don't like?
- by SurrenderMonkey - at 2016.10.04 15:32:25
|
14. How do I get out of a bubble? - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Piamet wrote: I am an explorer who scans sites and documents wormholes connections on my scanning frigate. It has cloaking and MWD, but no guns or defense modules. Suppose I stargate warp into a null-sec system and I find myself by warp bubble...
- by SurrenderMonkey - at 2016.09.26 17:32:34
|
15. Computation of ship survivability - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Estella Osoka wrote: No, it shouldn't. Stacking penalties only happen when you use the exact same module more than once. This is wrong . Stacking penalties are incurred by similar modules affecting the same stat . Adaptive and type-specif...
- by SurrenderMonkey - at 2016.02.12 17:36:01
|
16. Counter Cloaking - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Nathen Strive wrote: Crosi Wesdo wrote: Even if you could probe them people would just complain about how hard it was. And how cloaking is the worst thing in eve but investing SP in probing is a waste of time. This is why I say they shou...
- by SurrenderMonkey - at 2016.02.10 05:08:32
|
17. explain something to me - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
1upnate wrote: I was killed by a smartbombing BS and I'm upset about it. Why are things that upset me allowed?
- by SurrenderMonkey - at 2016.02.08 16:15:18
|
18. Them Curses - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Lucy Callagan wrote: Thorian Baalnorn wrote: That wont even scratch my curse. You would dead before you could kill all my drones and wouldnt even put me close to armor. It would take you almost 15 minutes to kill me. The funny thing is...
- by SurrenderMonkey - at 2016.01.18 20:35:54
|
19. Why do off grid links exist? - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Quote: Links on grid will be cool. Especially since grid is now 8000km. Still gonna need those probers. People really think they're just going to take the existing links and make them "on grid", huh? It's almost certainly going to be a to...
- by SurrenderMonkey - at 2015.12.14 06:04:20
|
20. Mutual Wars - can someone explain? - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Quote: Why is this the only time you can retract a war? Who knows. My guess would be that they want the aggressor to be "invested" for at least a week, normally, but they also wanted to prevent, e.g.; Corp A decs Corp B. Corp B makes dec m...
- by SurrenderMonkey - at 2015.12.09 17:18:57
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |